South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit, is facing a second major security crisis after 44.5 billion won (around $30–32 million) in digital assets were drained from a hot wallet, with authorities “strongly” suspecting North Korea’s Lazarus Group. According to ICT industry sources and government officials cited by Yonhap News on November 28, investigators are focusing […]South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit, is facing a second major security crisis after 44.5 billion won (around $30–32 million) in digital assets were drained from a hot wallet, with authorities “strongly” suspecting North Korea’s Lazarus Group. According to ICT industry sources and government officials cited by Yonhap News on November 28, investigators are focusing […]

$32 Million Crypto Heist: North Korea’s Lazarus Suspected In Upbit Breach

2025/11/29 04:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit, is facing a second major security crisis after 44.5 billion won (around $30–32 million) in digital assets were drained from a hot wallet, with authorities “strongly” suspecting North Korea’s Lazarus Group.

According to ICT industry sources and government officials cited by Yonhap News on November 28, investigators are focusing on Lazarus, a hacking unit under North Korea’s Reconnaissance General Bureau, as the likely perpetrator. The group was also suspected in Upbit’s 2019 breach, when approximately 58 billion won in Ethereum was stolen.

North Korean Crypto Hackers Strike Again

The latest incident again centers on a hot wallet — an internet-connected operational wallet — replicating the core vulnerability of 2019. A government official quoted by Yonhap said the attack likely did not involve a deep server exploit but instead an administrative compromise: “Rather than a server attack, it’s possible they compromised an administrator account or impersonated an administrator to transfer funds,” adding that because the earlier hack used this method, “we consider this approach the most likely.”

Security experts point to the post-hack on-chain behavior as key circumstantial evidence. After the theft, the funds were rapidly “hopped” through other exchange wallets and then subjected to “mixing,” a laundering technique designed to break traceability.

One expert noted that “funds were hopped to other exchange wallets before mixing occurred. This can be seen as the modus operandi of the Lazarus Group,” adding that “once mixing occurs, transactions become untraceable.” Because FATF member countries cannot legally operate mixing services, the expert argued it is “highly likely North Korea was responsible.”

The timing has raised additional suspicion. The hack occurred on November 27, the same day Naver and Upbit operator Dunamu held a high-profile joint press conference at Naver’s “1784” headquarters to present their group-integration and AI/Web3 expansion strategy.

A security expert suggested the date may have been intentionally chosen: “Hackers often have a strong desire to show off. It’s possible they chose the 27th as the hacking date to flaunt their timing, selecting the very day of the merger announcement.” The attack also lands almost exactly six years after Upbit’s 2019 hack, which occurred on November 27.

Regulatory and supervisory bodies have moved quickly. Following a December interpretation by the Financial Services Commission that virtual asset exchanges’ user transaction data falls under the Credit Information Act, the Financial Supervisory Service and the Korea Financial Security Institute have launched an on-site inspection of Upbit. The Korea Internet & Security Agency has joined to provide technical support.

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $3.07 trillion.

Total crypto market cap
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Fintech platforms are outpacing traditional banks in growth across nearly every measurable dimension. Customer acquisition rates, revenue growth, geographic expansion
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 07:58
Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

BitcoinWorld Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly TOKYO, Japan — March 2025: Japan’s National Consumer
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/24 08:10