The post South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea’s regulators are advancing plans to limit Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to bank-led consortia, requiring commercial banks to hold at least 51% stakes. This framework aims to safeguard financial stability and monetary policy while issuing the Digital Asset Basic Act by early 2025. South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions. The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management. With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers. South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments. What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework? South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act. How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea? The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem… The post South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea’s regulators are advancing plans to limit Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to bank-led consortia, requiring commercial banks to hold at least 51% stakes. This framework aims to safeguard financial stability and monetary policy while issuing the Digital Asset Basic Act by early 2025. South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions. The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management. With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers. South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments. What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework? South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act. How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea? The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem…

South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance

2025/12/03 09:54
  • South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions.

  • The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management.

  • With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers.

South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments.

What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework?

South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act.

How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea?

The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem but limiting flexibility for non-bank players.

Data from the Bank of Korea highlights the urgency: non-bank issuers could disrupt traditional banking by mimicking narrow bank operations, issuing currency alongside payment services without full regulatory buffers. For instance, the central bank’s recent warnings emphasize that such entities might undermine financial stability, with potential impacts on the 1.2 trillion South Korean won in circulating stablecoin equivalents reported in late 2024. Expert analysts from the Korea Institute of Finance note that bank involvement could enhance trust, drawing parallels to successful models in jurisdictions like the European Union.

However, this bank-centric model raises questions about innovation. Fintech advocates argue it may stifle competition, confining stablecoins to basic transactional roles rather than enabling advanced applications in decentralized finance or cross-border remittances. The Financial Services Commission’s post-meeting statement underscores that no final decisions have been made, signaling ongoing negotiations to refine the consortium’s operational guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the Key Requirements for Issuing Korean-Won-Pegged Stablecoins Under South Korea’s New Rules?

Under the proposed South Korea stablecoin regulation, issuers must form consortia with commercial banks holding over 51% of shares, ensuring robust oversight and compliance with national monetary policies. This setup prioritizes financial stability, as outlined in discussions by the Democratic Party and Financial Services Commission, preventing risks from unregulated entities.

Why Is the Bank of Korea Concerned About Non-Bank Stablecoin Issuers?

The Bank of Korea views non-bank stablecoin issuers as potential threats to monetary sovereignty and financial systems because they operate like narrow banks, issuing digital currency without traditional safeguards. This could erode deposit protections and complicate policy implementation, as highlighted in the central bank’s advisory reports from November 2024.

Key Takeaways

  • Bank-Dominated Consortia: Requiring over 51% bank ownership in stablecoin issuers to fortify regulatory control and protect the Korean won’s integrity.
  • Legislative Timeline: Government must submit a draft Digital Asset Basic Act by December 10, 2024, with potential lawmaker-led passage if delayed, targeting enactment in January 2025.
  • Balancing Act: While addressing Bank of Korea’s stability concerns, the framework may limit fintech innovation—monitor for adjustments in ongoing stakeholder dialogues.

Conclusion

South Korea’s stablecoin regulation marks a pivotal shift toward integrating digital assets under bank-led oversight, with the consortium model central to the Digital Asset Basic Act. By prioritizing financial security and addressing Bank of Korea warnings, this framework positions the nation as a leader in balanced crypto governance. As the December 10 deadline approaches, stakeholders should prepare for enhanced compliance, potentially unlocking safer innovations in the Korean-won-pegged stablecoin space—engage with evolving policies to navigate this transformative era.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/south-korea-plans-bank-led-consortia-for-korean-won-stablecoin-issuance

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Tom Lee Predicts Major Bitcoin Adoption Surge

Tom Lee Predicts Major Bitcoin Adoption Surge

The post Tom Lee Predicts Major Bitcoin Adoption Surge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Tom Lee suggests significant future Bitcoin adoption. Potential 200x increase in Bitcoin adoption forecast. Ethereum positioned as key settlement layer for tokenization. Tom Lee, co-founder of Fundstrat Global Advisors, predicted at Binance Blockchain Week that Bitcoin adoption could surge 200-fold amid shifts in institutional and retirement capital allocations. This outlook suggests a potential major restructuring of financial ecosystems, boosting Bitcoin and Ethereum as core assets, with tokenization poised to reshape markets significantly. Tom Lee Projects 200x Bitcoin Adoption Increase Tom Lee, known for his bullish stance on digital assets, suggested that Bitcoin might experience a 200 times adoption growth as more traditional retirement accounts transition to Bitcoin holdings. He predicts a break from Bitcoin’s traditional four-year cycle. Despite a market slowdown, Lee sees tokenization as a key trend with Wall Street eyeing on-chain financial products. The immediate implications suggest significant structural changes in digital finance. Lee highlighted that the adoption of a Bitcoin ETF by BlackRock exemplifies potential shifts in finance. If retirement funds begin reallocating to Bitcoin, it could catalyze substantial growth. Community reactions appear positive, with some experts agreeing that the tokenization of traditional finance is inevitable. Statements from Lee argue that Ethereum’s role in this transformation is crucial, resonating with broader positive sentiment from institutional and retail investors. As Lee explained, “2025 is the year of tokenization,” highlighting U.S. policy shifts and stablecoin volumes as key components of a bullish outlook. source Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the Future of Finance Did you know? Tom Lee suggests Bitcoin might deviate from its historical four-year cycle, driven by massive institutional interest and tokenization trends, potentially marking a new era in cryptocurrency adoption. Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $92,567.31, dominating 58.67% of the market. Its market cap stands at $1.85 trillion with a fully diluted market cap of $1.94 trillion.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/05 10:42
‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20?

‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20?

The post ‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chainlink has officially joined the U.S. Spot ETF club, following Grayscale’s successful debut on the 3rd of December.  The product achieved $13 million in day-one trading volume, significantly lower than the Solana [SOL] and Ripple [XRP], which saw $56 million and $33 million during their respective launches.  However, the Grayscale spot Chainlink [LINK] ETF saw $42 million in inflows during the launch. Reacting to the performance, Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas called it “another insta-hit.” “Also $41m in first day flows. Another insta-hit from the crypto world, only dud so far was Doge, but it’s still early.” Source: Bloomberg For his part, James Seyffart, another Bloomberg ETF analyst, said the debut volume was “strong” and “impressive.” He added,  “Chainlink showing that longer tail assets can find success in the ETF wrapper too.” The performance also meant broader market demand for LINK exposure, noted Peter Mintzberg, Grayscale CEO.  Impact on LINK markets Bitwise has also applied for a Spot LINK ETF and could receive the green light to trade soon. That said, LINK’s Open Interest (OI) surged from $194 million to nearly $240 million after the launch.  The surge indicated a surge in speculative interest for the token on the Futures market.  Source: Velo By extension, it also showed bullish sentiment following the debut. On the price charts, LINK rallied 8.6%, extending its weekly recovery to over 20% from around $12 to $15 before easing to $14.4 as of press time. It was still 47% down from the recent peak of $27.  The immediate overheads for bulls were $15 and $16, and clearing them could raise the odds for tagging $20. Especially if the ETF inflows extend.  Source: LINK/USDT, TradingView Assessing Chainlink’s growth Chainlink has grown over the years and has become the top decentralized oracle provider, offering numerous blockchain projects…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/05 10:26