As Black Friday marks the onset of peak customer service pressure, a new report from Typewise lays bare an uncomfortable reality: despite soaring expectations, AI and automation are still failing to relieve frontline strain. After analysing more than 10 million interactions across the US, UK and Europe, Typewise forecasts another sharp holiday surge, while efficiency […] The post Holiday Customer Service And The Future of AI-Driven Customer Support: An Interview With David Eberle, CEO at Typewise appeared first on TechBullion.As Black Friday marks the onset of peak customer service pressure, a new report from Typewise lays bare an uncomfortable reality: despite soaring expectations, AI and automation are still failing to relieve frontline strain. After analysing more than 10 million interactions across the US, UK and Europe, Typewise forecasts another sharp holiday surge, while efficiency […] The post Holiday Customer Service And The Future of AI-Driven Customer Support: An Interview With David Eberle, CEO at Typewise appeared first on TechBullion.

Holiday Customer Service And The Future of AI-Driven Customer Support: An Interview With David Eberle, CEO at Typewise

2025/12/05 00:29

As Black Friday marks the onset of peak customer service pressure, a new report from Typewise lays bare an uncomfortable reality: despite soaring expectations, AI and automation are still failing to relieve frontline strain. After analysing more than 10 million interactions across the US, UK and Europe, Typewise forecasts another sharp holiday surge, while efficiency drops and chatbots are pulled offline. In this TechBullion interview, Typewise’s CEO discusses why thinking time collapses, errors rise, and AI remains under-adopted, and why the gap between promise and performance is now costing organisations dearly, echoing Gartner’s warning on unmet AI ambitions.

Please tell us more about yourself and the solutions you provide at Typewise?

My name is David Eberle, and I’m a Swiss technologist and former strategy consultant (Booz & Co.) turned entrepreneur. Today I’m the Co-founder & CEO of Typewise, a Y Combinator-backed startup that delivers enterprise-grade AI agents for customer service teams to automate and re-imagine customer experience: from fetching data buried in legacy systems to resolving tickets end-to-end, it masters the repetitive and the complex alike.

What patterns in customer behaviour during the holiday season surprised you most in this year’s analysis?

Among the most compelling findings in Typewise’s Holiday Support Surge Report is the revelation that holiday support doesn’t just intensify existing pressures surrounding holiday shopping and customer decisions – it actually transforms the customer service environment entirely, indicating a much larger impact than the simple term of ‘support’ might imply.

Customer service representatives typically handle 22% more sessions per week during the peak shopping period, up from 160 to 195 interactions per agent. And while volume is part of the story, the actual nature of work shifts dramatically as agents lose the time usually spent contemplating responses and instead transition into rapid-fire writing just to meet demands.

How do you see retailers balancing customer expectations for instant support with the operational reality of limited agent capacity?

While inefficiencies are amplified during the holiday season, the repetitive nature of customer service queries is a challenge that AI is well-suited to address. In fact, Typewise customers already using AI-powered autocomplete and writing assistance are seeing 20-60% reductions in typing and response time, with retail and e-commerce agents saving 35% on average, which is the equivalent to more than a full workday per month!

Your recent report highlights a sharp drop in “thinking time” for agents during peak periods. Tell us more about the report and what it implies about the future skill set required in customer service roles?

Our report shows that during the holiday period, agents spend 13% less time thinking and 8% more time typing, with retail agents seeing an even sharper swing – thinking time down 17% and typing up 14%. 

That shift tells us something important about the future of customer service: The bottleneck is no longer empathy or expertise – it’s cognitive load. Agents aren’t struggling with what to say; they’re struggling with the volume of repetitive tasks that crowd out the higher-value skills customers actually benefit from.

As automation handles more of the predictable, repetitive writing, and our data shows 46% of human-written responses are predictable by AI, the agent role evolves into one centered on judgment, contextual escalation, and relationship-building. 

The future skill set is less about typing speed and more about supervising intelligent systems and stepping in only when human interaction with the customer is needed. 

Many companies deactivate chatbots during the holidays. What technical or strategic changes are needed before retailers can trust automation in their busiest moments?

Retailers throttle chat from 43% of interactions down to just 7% once peak season hits. Now it’s important to note they’re doing this with human-led or AI-assisted chat, not fully agentic chat.

And they do this – not because they dislike automation – they do it because current staffing and tools can’t handle the complexity and urgency that comes with the channel. 

Three things need to evolve before full AI agent-led support automation is reliable under pressure:

1) Multi-agent orchestration instead of single-task bots:

Most chatbots today operate as linear FAQ responders. When volume spikes, they break. Retailers need agentic systems that can retrieve data, interpret context, decide next steps, adapt to edge cases, and hand off intelligently. This is the shift the industry is now making.

2) Real-time decision intelligence:

Peak season issues aren’t static, but instead, they involve logistics, inventory, delays, and emotionally charged customers. Retailers need systems that understand urgency and act accordingly.

3) Proven operational resilience:

Retailers need evidence, not promises. Our platform is built on tens of millions of interactions and has already shown that AI can reduce the time required for human staff responses by 20–60%, giving teams breathing room when it matters most.

When automation becomes genuinely reliable during peak chaos – not just during quiet hours – retailers will stop turning it off.

Typewise works with brands such as Unilever, DPD and Beurer. What differences do you see in how global enterprises adopt AI compared with smaller retailers?

Enterprises like Unilever, DPD, and Beurer tend to adopt AI with a mindset of transformation, not tools. They’re thinking in terms of end-to-end journey redesign, multi-country rollout, and deep integrations into CRMs, ERPs, and legacy systems. That also means more stakeholders: security, legal, works councils, and operations all need to be aligned, so a lot of our early work is around governance, data residency, and change management rather than just “turning on” a feature.

Smaller retailers, by contrast, want the same outcomes, faster responses, happier customers, but need to get there with leaner teams and less IT capacity. They look for quick wins, out-of-the-box value, and a pilot that can go live in days, not months. So we adapt the same core technology to both realities: for a global enterprise, we might orchestrate a whole “team” of AI agents across channels and regions, while for a mid-market retailer, we focus on a single unified assistant that sits on top of their helpdesk and immediately takes cognitive load off the team. The ambition is similar; the path and constraints are very different.

Given that AI can predict almost half of agent responses, what barriers still prevent teams from fully leveraging that capability?

Workflow friction is a big one. During peak weeks, agents are so overloaded that they stop using the very tools meant to help them. Snippet and automated form usage drops by 27% during the holidays, not because the tools don’t work, but because they require too much context switching. When volume spikes, agents revert to manual typing because it feels faster in the moment, even though it creates more errors and slows teams down.

Furthermore, legacy support tools aren’t designed for automation. Most support platforms weren’t built with native AI in mind. They bolt it on, which means agents still carry a massive cognitive load.

Finally, there is compliance anxiety. Even when AI can generate accurate responses, teams hesitate because they lack guardrails, auditability, and role-based controls.

How is Typewise approaching data privacy, model training, and regional compliance when working across the US, UK and Europe?

We start from a simple principle: your customer data belongs to you. Typewise acts as a data processor; we don’t sell data, and we don’t train shared, cross-customer foundation models on your conversations by default. Where customers want model fine-tuning, we do it on anonymised data, with clear contractual controls around retention and purpose limitation. Our platform is ISO 27001-certified and GDPR-compliant, with data encrypted in transit and at rest, and hosted in AWS or Azure regions selected per customer, including EU-only processing where required. 

From a regulatory perspective, we design for the strictest regimes first. In Europe and the UK, that means privacy-by-design aligned with GDPR/UK GDPR and the emerging EU AI Act: data minimization, clearly defined legal bases, support for data subject rights, detailed audit trails, and AI assistants configured in the “limited-risk” category with human hand-off for high-impact decisions.

Practically, that means customers can decide where their data lives, which systems an AI agent may access, what it is allowed to do autonomously, and how long data is retained. Every automated action is logged and reviewable, and sensitive workflows (like large refunds or policy exceptions) can be kept human-in-the-loop by design, regardless of whether the end customer is in the US, the UK or the EU.

With customer service volumes forecast to rise again, where are retailers likely to see the strongest return on investment from AI over the next 12–24 months?

Over the next two years, the biggest ROI for retailers will come from AI that reduces the cognitive load on both agents and customers, not just the time it takes to resolve a ticket. We’re seeing a shift away from basic automation toward systems that actually structure agents’ work, especially during peak seasons.

One example is multi-agent orchestration. Instead of relying on a single chatbot to do everything, retailers are beginning to adopt AI “teams” in the background – one system pulling data, another interpreting context, another drafting, and another validating compliance or policy alignment. This division of labor yields much higher accuracy and dramatically reduces the back-and-forth that eats up time and frustrates customers.

Retailers will also see significant ROI from automating the first draft of repetitive messages. Our data shows that nearly half of what agents type could be generated automatically, and when that happens, efficiency gains of 20–40% per agent are realistic. Beyond that, intelligent triage and intent recognition will make a measurable dent in misrouted conversations, while proactive logistics communication will reduce the massive volume of “Where is my order?” inquiries that spike during the holidays.

The bottom line is that the strongest ROI will go to retailers who focus on eliminating friction across the customer journey. AI that clarifies, structures, and reduces effort, rather than simply speeding up typing, is where the next wave of value will be created.

Beyond customer service efficiency, how do you see AI reshaping the wider retail and e-commerce experience, from logistics to post-purchase engagement?

AI will reshape retail far beyond the service desk, because the real frontier is not a more innovative chatbot, it’s a unified, always-on concierge for the entire customer journey. Instead of separate experiences for “shopping”, “support”, and “order tracking”, you’ll interact with a single intelligent assistant that knows who you are, what you’re trying to achieve, and can move seamlessly between product discovery, problem-solving, and purchase in one continuous conversation. The line between sales and service will blur: a question about a delayed parcel might turn into a tailored upsell; a sizing concern might instantly surface the right product, policy and shipping option without ever changing channels. That’s what conversational commerce looks like when it finally matures.

Under the hood, this requires AI to stitch together logistics, fulfilment, and post-purchase engagement. In logistics, AI will coordinate with carriers to anticipate delays, trigger proactive notifications, and propose solutions, refunds, replacements, and alternative delivery options before the customer has to ask. In parallel, personalization will finally extend beyond marketing into operations: policies, messaging, and resolutions can be dynamically adapted based on context, history, and loyalty level.

A big unlock here is “unified retail memory.” Retailers sit on vast amounts of fragmented data, support transcripts, order history, inventory, product feedback, loyalty programmes, but very little of it is accessible in real time. AI can turn that into a living memory that every assistant can tap into, so each interaction makes the next one smarter.

So, beyond efficiency gains, AI is preparing to reorganize the retail experience into something that feels much more human: a single, consistent concierge that takes care of you before, during, and long after the transaction, regardless of which channel you start on.

Comments
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Tom Lee Predicts Major Bitcoin Adoption Surge

Tom Lee Predicts Major Bitcoin Adoption Surge

The post Tom Lee Predicts Major Bitcoin Adoption Surge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Tom Lee suggests significant future Bitcoin adoption. Potential 200x increase in Bitcoin adoption forecast. Ethereum positioned as key settlement layer for tokenization. Tom Lee, co-founder of Fundstrat Global Advisors, predicted at Binance Blockchain Week that Bitcoin adoption could surge 200-fold amid shifts in institutional and retirement capital allocations. This outlook suggests a potential major restructuring of financial ecosystems, boosting Bitcoin and Ethereum as core assets, with tokenization poised to reshape markets significantly. Tom Lee Projects 200x Bitcoin Adoption Increase Tom Lee, known for his bullish stance on digital assets, suggested that Bitcoin might experience a 200 times adoption growth as more traditional retirement accounts transition to Bitcoin holdings. He predicts a break from Bitcoin’s traditional four-year cycle. Despite a market slowdown, Lee sees tokenization as a key trend with Wall Street eyeing on-chain financial products. The immediate implications suggest significant structural changes in digital finance. Lee highlighted that the adoption of a Bitcoin ETF by BlackRock exemplifies potential shifts in finance. If retirement funds begin reallocating to Bitcoin, it could catalyze substantial growth. Community reactions appear positive, with some experts agreeing that the tokenization of traditional finance is inevitable. Statements from Lee argue that Ethereum’s role in this transformation is crucial, resonating with broader positive sentiment from institutional and retail investors. As Lee explained, “2025 is the year of tokenization,” highlighting U.S. policy shifts and stablecoin volumes as key components of a bullish outlook. source Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the Future of Finance Did you know? Tom Lee suggests Bitcoin might deviate from its historical four-year cycle, driven by massive institutional interest and tokenization trends, potentially marking a new era in cryptocurrency adoption. Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $92,567.31, dominating 58.67% of the market. Its market cap stands at $1.85 trillion with a fully diluted market cap of $1.94 trillion.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/05 10:42
‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20?

‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20?

The post ‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chainlink has officially joined the U.S. Spot ETF club, following Grayscale’s successful debut on the 3rd of December.  The product achieved $13 million in day-one trading volume, significantly lower than the Solana [SOL] and Ripple [XRP], which saw $56 million and $33 million during their respective launches.  However, the Grayscale spot Chainlink [LINK] ETF saw $42 million in inflows during the launch. Reacting to the performance, Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas called it “another insta-hit.” “Also $41m in first day flows. Another insta-hit from the crypto world, only dud so far was Doge, but it’s still early.” Source: Bloomberg For his part, James Seyffart, another Bloomberg ETF analyst, said the debut volume was “strong” and “impressive.” He added,  “Chainlink showing that longer tail assets can find success in the ETF wrapper too.” The performance also meant broader market demand for LINK exposure, noted Peter Mintzberg, Grayscale CEO.  Impact on LINK markets Bitwise has also applied for a Spot LINK ETF and could receive the green light to trade soon. That said, LINK’s Open Interest (OI) surged from $194 million to nearly $240 million after the launch.  The surge indicated a surge in speculative interest for the token on the Futures market.  Source: Velo By extension, it also showed bullish sentiment following the debut. On the price charts, LINK rallied 8.6%, extending its weekly recovery to over 20% from around $12 to $15 before easing to $14.4 as of press time. It was still 47% down from the recent peak of $27.  The immediate overheads for bulls were $15 and $16, and clearing them could raise the odds for tagging $20. Especially if the ETF inflows extend.  Source: LINK/USDT, TradingView Assessing Chainlink’s growth Chainlink has grown over the years and has become the top decentralized oracle provider, offering numerous blockchain projects…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/05 10:26