ExchangeDEX+

Buy Crypto Markets Spot Futures500X Earn Events

Gold Bar & BTC Giveaway2000g

Jupiter's Kash Dhanda acknowledges error in 'zero contagion' claims for Lend vaults, sparking community backlash.Jupiter's Kash Dhanda acknowledges error in 'zero contagion' claims for Lend vaults, sparking community backlash.

Jupiter Executive Admits Error in Lending Vault Contagion Claims

By: bitcoininfonews

2025/12/07 08:21

ZERO$0.000009453+2.07%

What to Know:

Jupiter’s Kash Dhanda admits errors in “zero contagion” claims.
The claim was not “100% correct,” impacting user trust.
Competitors and users raised concerns over risk transparency.

Jupiter’s executive Kash Dhanda admitted that claims of their vaults having ‘zero contagion’ were inaccurate, following criticism from competitors Kamino and Fluid over rehypothecation practices.

This admission highlights transparency issues in DeFi, affecting Jupiter’s reputation and governance, particularly as competitors stress the potential risks of interconnected collateral systems.

Jupiter executive Kash Dhanda admitted to mistakes in labeling Jupiter Lend’s vaults as having “zero contagion,” following significant backlash from community members and competitors.

The admission underscores the complexities of risk management and transparency in DeFi systems, highlighting critical reputational challenges for Jupiter amid competitor criticism.

Kash Dhanda Admits Misleading Safety Claims

Kash Dhanda, Jupiter executive, acknowledged the misleading “zero contagion” labels after criticism. The controversy centers on Jupiter Lend’s use of rehypothecation and its actual risk containment.

Community and competitors criticized the misleading safety expectations set by the “zero contagion” claims. Actions involved blocking Jupiter’s migration tool to curb maintenance of false safety narratives.

Community Reacts to Contagion Claim Reversal

The admission prompted an immediate reaction from community members, questioning risk transparency. Concerns were raised over the security of rehypothecation-based vaults, affecting Jupiter’s reputation.

Financial implications include a pause in DAO voting until 2025, reflecting a “breakdown in trust.” The error impacts user confidence in Jupiter’s risk management practices.

Rehypothecation Risks Resurface in DeFi

The incident parallels previous DeFi controversies where “isolated vaults” were not truly isolatable. Rehypothecation has historically led to unexpected interdependencies in stressed markets. Kash Dhanda stated, “The ‘zero contagion’ claim was not 100% correct,” highlighting the need for increased accuracy in their communications.

Potential outcomes include increased scrutiny on DeFi transparency. Historical trends suggest Jupiter may face long-term trust rebuilding and possible revisions in its risk communication strategies.

Disclaimer: The information on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile, and investing involves risk. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.