MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade. In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric […]MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade. In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric […]

Meat importers seek expansion of pork MAV to allow new entrants

2025/12/07 20:01

MEAT IMPORTERS said the Department of Agriculture (DA) needs to raise the minimum access volume (MAV) for pork imports, in order to allow more entrants to participate in the import trade.

In a letter to the DA, the Meat Importers and Traders Association (MITA) said the department’s decision to retain the MAV at 55,000 metric tons (MT) limits opportunities for new entrants and fails to reflect current market needs.

According to MITA, pre-MAV, pork production in 1994 was roughly 1 million MT (MMT) and peaked at 1.9 MMT in 2019. Following the African Swine Fever (ASF) outbreak, production reverted to 1994 levels despite an almost doubling of the Philippine population.

MITA said the hog industry’s recovery will take years and that the proposed reallocation, particularly the portion earmarked for state-owned enterprises, which already import duty-free, will not increase total supply.

The MAV is a commitment to the World Trade Organization to allow certain quantities of goods for import. Shipments within the MAV quota are charged a most favored nation tariff, while volumes beyond that pay higher rates.

Pork shipments within the MAV quota are subject to a 15% tariff, while volumes exceeding the MAV are charged the regular 25% rate.

Agriculture Secretary Francisco Tiu Laurel, Jr. has said that the department will review MAV rules after finding that only a handful of importers cornered a significant portion of the quota. MITA said the DA’s proposed rules would allocate 50% of import quotas to processors, 30% to state-owned enterprises, and 20% to other sectors. 

MITA noted that the problem lies not with the existing allocation scheme but with the overall MAV available for importers.

“Those without quota often argue that the system is unfair to them… The challenge arises when new entrants seek to participate but available volumes are insufficient,” MITA President Emeritus Jesus C. Cham said in the letter.

The DA said it intends to maintain the total MAV under the new scheme as increased volumes would hurt the already-low farmgate prices of hog.

“Right now, we can’t raise the MAV because of the low farmgate price. It’s not the right time,” Mr. Tiu Laurel has told reporters.

In November, the DA froze applications for MAV quotas while the new policy was being worked out. MITA said the DA told it that the allocations will be finalized in January.

“The abruptness of this announcement caught licensees entirely by surprise. Orders have already been placed and buying decisions finalized. These sudden shifts have created substantial uncertainty, as imports may now fall under out-quota rates, significantly affecting landed cost and contractual commitments,” Mr. Cham said.

Earlier this year, MITA said it recommended increasing the pork MAV by 500,000 MT to offset the 900,000-MT production lost due to the ASF outbreak. The MAV Advisory Council later proposed an initial MAV Plus of 250,000 MT until 2028. Neither recommendation has been implemented.

MITA urged the government to retain the current MAV Guidelines and activate the MAV Plus mechanism for both pork and poultry, prioritizing existing licensees while designating part of the volume for first-come-first-served allocation.

The group also recommended referring the matter to the MAV Advisory Council, which they said has historically represented all stakeholders. — Vonn Andrei E. Villamiel

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27
The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The post The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. From encrypted chats to decentralized messaging Encrypted messengers are having a second wave. Apps like WhatsApp, iMessage and Signal made end-to-end encryption (E2EE) a default expectation. But most still hinge on phone numbers, centralized servers and a lot of metadata, such as who you talk to, when, from which IP and on which device. That is what Vitalik Buterin is aiming at in his recent X post and donation. He argues the next steps for secure messaging are permissionless account creation with no phone numbers or Know Your Customer (KYC) and much stronger metadata privacy. In that context he highlighted Session and SimpleX and sent 128 Ether (ETH) to each to keep pushing in that direction. Session is a good case study because it tries to combine E2E encryption with decentralization. There is no central message server, traffic is routed through onion paths, and user IDs are keys instead of phone numbers. Did you know? Forty-three percent of people who use public WiFi report experiencing a data breach, with man-in-the-middle attacks and packet sniffing against unencrypted traffic among the most common causes. How Session stores your messages Session is built around public key identities. When you sign up, the app generates a keypair locally and derives a Session ID from it with no phone number or email required. Messages travel through a network of service nodes using onion routing so that no single node can see both the sender and the recipient. (You can see your message’s node path in the settings.) For asynchronous delivery when you are offline, messages are stored in small groups of nodes called “swarms.” Each Session ID is mapped to a specific swarm, and your messages are stored there encrypted until your client fetches them. Historically, messages had a default time-to-live of about two weeks…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 14:40