The post Solana (SOL) Ecosystem in Turmoil: Two Protocols Collide, Solana Foundation Issues Statement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Discussions on the Jupiter Lend vault design, one of the most talked-about topics in the Solana ecosystem, escalated further over the weekend. Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Exchange’s chief operating officer, released a video statement addressing community concerns regarding the protocol’s lending product, acknowledging that claims of “zero risk of contagion” circulating on social media are “not 100% accurate.” Dhanda noted that some previous posts had portrayed Jupiter Lend’s vaults as “isolated risk,” with one post even stating that “cross-contamination is completely eliminated.” This post was subsequently deleted by the Jupiter team due to backlash. Dhanda said in his statement: “The post we described as having zero risk of infection was completely inaccurate. We wanted to delete it to prevent further spread, but in hindsight, we should have issued a correction at that time.” The controversy was sparked by Fluid co-founder Samyak Jain’s announcement that Jupiter Lend uses rehypothecation for capital efficiency. This means collateral users deposit into vaults can be reused elsewhere within the protocol, meaning the collateral isn’t completely isolated. According to Jain, Jupiter Lend vaults can still be considered “isolated” because each vault has its own configuration, limit, liquidation threshold, and penalty rate. However, this structure does not prevent collateral reuse due to the shared liquidity layer. Dhanda also confirmed the use of rehypothecation, saying, “This mechanism is why these collateral generates returns.” However, Dhanda argued that the vaults are still “internally isolated.” Marius Ciubotariu, co-founder of rival Solana lending protocol Kamino, publicly criticized Jupiter Lend’s design. Kamino recently blocked Jupiter’s financial instrument from accessing Kamino positions. Ciubotariu argued that funds from a user who had pledged SOL collateral were being sent to loop trades and other risky positions, writing: “There’s no isolation here, just complete cross-contamination. Contrary to what’s advertised.” As the debate escalated, Solana Foundation President Lily… The post Solana (SOL) Ecosystem in Turmoil: Two Protocols Collide, Solana Foundation Issues Statement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Discussions on the Jupiter Lend vault design, one of the most talked-about topics in the Solana ecosystem, escalated further over the weekend. Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Exchange’s chief operating officer, released a video statement addressing community concerns regarding the protocol’s lending product, acknowledging that claims of “zero risk of contagion” circulating on social media are “not 100% accurate.” Dhanda noted that some previous posts had portrayed Jupiter Lend’s vaults as “isolated risk,” with one post even stating that “cross-contamination is completely eliminated.” This post was subsequently deleted by the Jupiter team due to backlash. Dhanda said in his statement: “The post we described as having zero risk of infection was completely inaccurate. We wanted to delete it to prevent further spread, but in hindsight, we should have issued a correction at that time.” The controversy was sparked by Fluid co-founder Samyak Jain’s announcement that Jupiter Lend uses rehypothecation for capital efficiency. This means collateral users deposit into vaults can be reused elsewhere within the protocol, meaning the collateral isn’t completely isolated. According to Jain, Jupiter Lend vaults can still be considered “isolated” because each vault has its own configuration, limit, liquidation threshold, and penalty rate. However, this structure does not prevent collateral reuse due to the shared liquidity layer. Dhanda also confirmed the use of rehypothecation, saying, “This mechanism is why these collateral generates returns.” However, Dhanda argued that the vaults are still “internally isolated.” Marius Ciubotariu, co-founder of rival Solana lending protocol Kamino, publicly criticized Jupiter Lend’s design. Kamino recently blocked Jupiter’s financial instrument from accessing Kamino positions. Ciubotariu argued that funds from a user who had pledged SOL collateral were being sent to loop trades and other risky positions, writing: “There’s no isolation here, just complete cross-contamination. Contrary to what’s advertised.” As the debate escalated, Solana Foundation President Lily…

Solana (SOL) Ecosystem in Turmoil: Two Protocols Collide, Solana Foundation Issues Statement

2025/12/08 02:26

Discussions on the Jupiter Lend vault design, one of the most talked-about topics in the Solana ecosystem, escalated further over the weekend.

Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Exchange’s chief operating officer, released a video statement addressing community concerns regarding the protocol’s lending product, acknowledging that claims of “zero risk of contagion” circulating on social media are “not 100% accurate.”

Dhanda noted that some previous posts had portrayed Jupiter Lend’s vaults as “isolated risk,” with one post even stating that “cross-contamination is completely eliminated.” This post was subsequently deleted by the Jupiter team due to backlash.

Dhanda said in his statement:

The controversy was sparked by Fluid co-founder Samyak Jain’s announcement that Jupiter Lend uses rehypothecation for capital efficiency. This means collateral users deposit into vaults can be reused elsewhere within the protocol, meaning the collateral isn’t completely isolated.

According to Jain, Jupiter Lend vaults can still be considered “isolated” because each vault has its own configuration, limit, liquidation threshold, and penalty rate. However, this structure does not prevent collateral reuse due to the shared liquidity layer.

Dhanda also confirmed the use of rehypothecation, saying, “This mechanism is why these collateral generates returns.” However, Dhanda argued that the vaults are still “internally isolated.”

Marius Ciubotariu, co-founder of rival Solana lending protocol Kamino, publicly criticized Jupiter Lend’s design. Kamino recently blocked Jupiter’s financial instrument from accessing Kamino positions.

Ciubotariu argued that funds from a user who had pledged SOL collateral were being sent to loop trades and other risky positions, writing:

As the debate escalated, Solana Foundation President Lily Liu called on both sides on social media. Liu demanded that Kamino and Jupiter Lend stop targeting each other. Liu noted that the Solana lending market is approximately $5 billion, while Ethereum has a volume 10 times that, and the traditional financial collateral market is much larger.

Liu used the following expressions in his message:

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/solana-sol-ecosystem-in-turmoil-two-protocols-collide-solana-foundation-issues-statement/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The post The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. From encrypted chats to decentralized messaging Encrypted messengers are having a second wave. Apps like WhatsApp, iMessage and Signal made end-to-end encryption (E2EE) a default expectation. But most still hinge on phone numbers, centralized servers and a lot of metadata, such as who you talk to, when, from which IP and on which device. That is what Vitalik Buterin is aiming at in his recent X post and donation. He argues the next steps for secure messaging are permissionless account creation with no phone numbers or Know Your Customer (KYC) and much stronger metadata privacy. In that context he highlighted Session and SimpleX and sent 128 Ether (ETH) to each to keep pushing in that direction. Session is a good case study because it tries to combine E2E encryption with decentralization. There is no central message server, traffic is routed through onion paths, and user IDs are keys instead of phone numbers. Did you know? Forty-three percent of people who use public WiFi report experiencing a data breach, with man-in-the-middle attacks and packet sniffing against unencrypted traffic among the most common causes. How Session stores your messages Session is built around public key identities. When you sign up, the app generates a keypair locally and derives a Session ID from it with no phone number or email required. Messages travel through a network of service nodes using onion routing so that no single node can see both the sender and the recipient. (You can see your message’s node path in the settings.) For asynchronous delivery when you are offline, messages are stored in small groups of nodes called “swarms.” Each Session ID is mapped to a specific swarm, and your messages are stored there encrypted until your client fetches them. Historically, messages had a default time-to-live of about two weeks…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 14:40
Grayscale Files Sui Trust as 21Shares Launches First SUI ETF Amid Rising Demand

Grayscale Files Sui Trust as 21Shares Launches First SUI ETF Amid Rising Demand

The post Grayscale Files Sui Trust as 21Shares Launches First SUI ETF Amid Rising Demand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Grayscale Sui Trust filing and 21Shares’ launch of the first SUI ETF highlight surging interest in regulated Sui investments. These products offer investors direct exposure to the SUI token through spot-style structures, simplifying access to the Sui blockchain’s growth without direct custody needs, amid expanding altcoin ETF options. Grayscale’s spot Sui Trust seeks to track SUI price performance for long-term holders. 21Shares’ SUI ETF provides leveraged exposure, targeting traders with 2x daily returns. Early trading data shows over 4,700 shares exchanged, with volumes exceeding $24 per unit in the debut session. Explore Grayscale Sui Trust filing and 21Shares SUI ETF launch: Key developments in regulated Sui investments for 2025. Stay informed on altcoin ETF trends. What is the Grayscale Sui Trust? The Grayscale Sui Trust is a proposed spot-style investment product filed via S-1 registration with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, aimed at providing investors with direct exposure to the SUI token’s price movements. This trust mirrors the performance of SUI, the native cryptocurrency of the Sui blockchain, minus applicable fees, offering a regulated avenue for long-term participation in the network’s ecosystem. By holding SUI assets on behalf of investors, it eliminates the need for individuals to manage token storage or transactions directly. ⚡ LATEST: GRAYSCALE FILES S-1 FOR $SUI TRUSTThe “Grayscale Sui Trust,” is a spot-style ETF designed to provide direct exposure to the $SUI token. Grayscale’s goal is to mirror SUI’s market performance, minus fees, giving long-term investors a regulated, hassle-free way to… pic.twitter.com/mPQMINLrYC — CryptosRus (@CryptosR_Us) December 6, 2025 How does the 21Shares SUI ETF differ from traditional funds? The 21Shares SUI ETF, launched under the ticker TXXS, introduces a leveraged approach with 2x daily exposure to SUI’s price fluctuations, utilizing derivatives for amplified returns rather than direct spot holdings. This structure appeals to short-term…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 14:20