According to findings released Wednesday by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), nine of America’s largest banks maintained policies that restricted certain customers’ access to banking services between 2020 and 2023, making it the first public confirmation of practices that President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticized as “debanking.” The OCC found that […]According to findings released Wednesday by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), nine of America’s largest banks maintained policies that restricted certain customers’ access to banking services between 2020 and 2023, making it the first public confirmation of practices that President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticized as “debanking.” The OCC found that […]

OCC exposes banks 'inappropriate' customer distinctions across multiple sectors

2025/12/11 07:14

According to findings released Wednesday by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), nine of America’s largest banks maintained policies that restricted certain customers’ access to banking services between 2020 and 2023, making it the first public confirmation of practices that President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticized as “debanking.”

The OCC found that JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp, Capital One, PNC Financial Services Group, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal made “inappropriate distinctions” among customers, requiring some to undergo escalated reviews and approvals or face restricted access to banking services altogether.

The affected sectors ranged widely, including oil and gas exploration, coal mining, firearms manufacturers, private prisons, payday lenders, tobacco and e-cigarette companies, adult entertainment businesses, political action committees, and digital asset firms. 

According to the OCC, all these happened between 2020 and 2023, with the regulator’s six-page report confirming that similar policies and practices were in place at each of the banks reviewed.

“The OCC is committed to ending efforts, whether instigated by regulators or banks, that would weaponize finance,” said Jonathan Gould, the agency’s acting comptroller.

Trump administration probes the banks

The findings follow months of heightened attention to the issue from the Trump administration. In August, the president signed an executive order alleging that financial institutions had restricted access to services based on customers’ political or religious beliefs. 

The order directed regulators to eliminate reputation risk as a factor in banking decisions and require banks to base their determinations on individualized, objective, and risk-based analyses.

The OCC began sending letters to major Wall Street lenders in September demanding details on their practices, after Trump and other Republicans repeatedly raised concerns about banks depriving certain individuals and businesses of services. 

The Wednesday report represents the first formal findings from that inquiry, though the agency said it is still reviewing thousands of complaints to identify instances of political and religious debanking.

At the conclusion of its review, the OCC intends to hold banks accountable for any unlawful debanking activities, including by making referrals to the Attorney General as required by the executive order.

Industry defends risk management approach

Banking industry representatives have pushed back against the description of their practices as discriminatory. The Bank Policy Institute, a trade group representing many of the named institutions, said in a statement that banks have a strong incentive to serve as many customers as possible to drive economic growth.

“The industry supports fair access to banking and is already working together with Congress and the administration to ensure banks are able to serve law-abiding customers,” the group said.

Citigroup, PNC, BMO, and U.S. Bancorp, and the other accused banks are yet to comment on the matter, according to representatives for the other lenders. 

Some bank executives have previously called for greater regulatory clarity around reputational risk, saying they do not discriminate based on political affiliations while maintaining that they must manage various forms of risk.

Debate over scope and causes

Consumer advocates contend there is little evidence to show that the debanking issue is widespread, with former Fed Vice Chair Michael Barr stating in February that he had not seen evidence of political debanking and describing account closures as appropriate risk management.

However, critics argue that bank examiners have pushed lenders to sever ties with politically sensitive clients even when they posed no threat to the bank’s safety and soundness. 

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam

The post U.S. Court Finds Pastor Found Guilty in $3M Crypto Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crime 18 September 2025 | 04:05 A Colorado judge has brought closure to one of the state’s most unusual cryptocurrency scandals, declaring INDXcoin to be a fraudulent operation and ordering its founders, Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn, to repay $3.34 million. The ruling, issued by District Court Judge Heidi L. Kutcher, came nearly two years after the couple persuaded hundreds of people to invest in their token, promising safety and abundance through a Christian-branded platform called the Kingdom Wealth Exchange. The scheme ran between June 2022 and April 2023 and drew in more than 300 participants, many of them members of local church networks. Marketing materials portrayed INDXcoin as a low-risk gateway to prosperity, yet the project unraveled almost immediately. The exchange itself collapsed within 24 hours of launch, wiping out investors’ money. Despite this failure—and despite an auditor’s damning review that gave the system a “0 out of 10” for security—the Regalados kept presenting it as a solid opportunity. Colorado regulators argued that the couple’s faith-based appeal was central to the fraud. Securities Commissioner Tung Chan said the Regalados “dressed an old scam in new technology” and used their standing within the Christian community to convince people who had little knowledge of crypto. For him, the case illustrates how modern digital assets can be exploited to replicate classic Ponzi-style tactics under a different name. Court filings revealed where much of the money ended up: luxury goods, vacations, jewelry, a Range Rover, high-end clothing, and even dental procedures. In a video that drew worldwide attention earlier this year, Eli Regalado admitted the funds had been spent, explaining that a portion went to taxes while the remainder was used for a home renovation he claimed was divinely inspired. The judgment not only confirms that INDXcoin qualifies as a…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:14