The post AAVE Price: Governance Clash Triggers 18% Weekly Drop as Stani Kulechov Buys the Dip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR Aave Labs submitted a brandThe post AAVE Price: Governance Clash Triggers 18% Weekly Drop as Stani Kulechov Buys the Dip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TLDR Aave Labs submitted a brand

AAVE Price: Governance Clash Triggers 18% Weekly Drop as Stani Kulechov Buys the Dip

TLDR

  • Aave Labs submitted a brand control proposal without the original author’s consent, escalating DAO governance tensions.
  • The AAVE price has dropped 18% in one week, including 4.75% in one day.
  • Ernesto Boado disavowed the proposal submission, criticizing the rushed timeline and lack of prior notice.
  • Aave Labs replaced ParaSwap with CoW Swap, redirecting $200K/week in fees from the DAO to company-controlled addresses.
  • Founder Stani Kulechov purchased 84,033 AAVE worth $12.6M in a week, currently facing an unrealized loss of $2.2M.

In our recent report, Blockonomi revealed the ongoing misunderstanding between Aave Labs and the DAO over protocol ownership and governance. The tension escalated after Aave Labs submitted a brand control proposal to Snapshot without the original author’s consent.

Boado Disavows Vote Submission by Aave Labs

A recap of what really happened, as per our report, reveals that Ernesto Boado, co-founder of BGD Labs, publicly rejected the vote, stating, “This is not, in ethos, my proposal.”  He confirmed that Aave Labs submitted the draft without notice and objected to the rushed timeline during the holidays.

The proposal sought to transfer ownership of key assets like aave.com, GitHub, and social accounts to a DAO-controlled entity.  Boado clarified that he would not have approved the current version or timing of the submission.  Stani Kulechov, Aave’s founder, responded by defending the vote’s legality under the DAO’s governance process.

Earlier, Aave Labs replaced ParaSwap with CoW Swap, shifting $200K/week in fees from the DAO to itself. Delegates said the change lacked approval and diverted revenue generated through the DAO’s liquidity.  Aave Labs argued the frontend remains separate and voluntary contributions were never guaranteed.

AAVE Price Drops to $152

According to the latest CoinMarketCap data, AAVE price is currently trading at $152.49, representing a 4.75% decrease over the last 24 hours. The AAVE price has shown a consistent downward trend throughout the day, with a brief recovery failing to hold above $154. The chart indicates a peak near $161, followed by a steady decline.

Source: CoinMarketCap

The market cap has also dropped 4.75%, now sitting at $2.33 billion. Trading volume, however, rose 34.59% over the same period, reaching $708.52 million. The volume-to-market capitalization ratio is currently 30.44%, indicating increased short-term activity.

AAVE’s fully diluted valuation stands at $2.43 billion, while total value locked (TVL) is reported at $33.74 billion. The market cap-to-TVL ratio is 0.06928, indicating a disparity between token value and protocol usage.

Stani Kulechov Accumulates 84K AAVE, Faces $2.2M Unrealized Loss

Despite the ongoing saga and AAVE price dip, a post on X by Lookonchain reveals that Stani Kulechov executed multiple AAVE-related transactions through Gnosis Safe and CoW Protocol. He purchased a total of 32,660 AAVE, valued at approximately $5.15 million, at an average price of $158. The transactions include inflows and outflows involving WETH and AAVE, routed via settlement contracts.

He received 935.234 WETH from CoW Protocol and transferred 48.793 WETH back, equaling about $147.7K. Other transactions show repeated movement of WETH and Aave Labs tokens between wallets linked to him and the protocol. One entry indicates 569.329 AAVE moved from CoW Protocol to Stani Kulechov’s Gnosis wallet.

Over the past week, Stani accumulated a total of 84,033 AAVE, valued at $12.6 million, at an average cost of $176. Based on the current AAVE market price, his position shows an unrealized loss of approximately $2.2 million.

The post AAVE Price: Governance Clash Triggers 18% Weekly Drop as Stani Kulechov Buys the Dip appeared first on Blockonomi.

Source: https://blockonomi.com/aave-price-governance-clash-triggers-18-weekly-drop-as-stani-kulechov-buys-the-dip/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns

The post How ZKP’s Daily Presale Auction Is Creating a New Standard for 1,000x Returns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclaimer: This article is a sponsored
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 09:02
Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT?

The post Lighter drops 14% after losing $2 support – More pain ahead for LIT? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Since it touched a high of $4.5, Lighter has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 08:46