The post Spain to expose every crypto transaction: Will 2026 see the end of privacy? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In its latest regulatory push, Spain isThe post Spain to expose every crypto transaction: Will 2026 see the end of privacy? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In its latest regulatory push, Spain is

Spain to expose every crypto transaction: Will 2026 see the end of privacy?

In its latest regulatory push, Spain is finally shifting from a free-for-all crypto landscape to a fully structured, highly supervised financial regime.

By mid-year 2026, the EU’s MiCA framework will be fully in place.

The National Securities Market Commission (CNMV), already overseeing more than 60 players, including BBVA and Cecabank, will formally bring digital assets under institutional oversight.

This move will result in compliance no longer being optional, but the minimum requirement for operating in the country’s crypto market.

Notably, the government’s decision to extend the transition period until 1st July 2026 gives registered firms a final window to adapt.

But it’s not a soft landing.

Any company that fails to obtain full European licensing by the deadline will be required to shut down its Spanish operations, narrowing the field to only the strongest and most compliant actors.

The DAC8 crypto directive

While MiCA structures the market, the DAC8 directive, taking effect on the 1st of January 2026, will fundamentally redefine how the state interacts with crypto investors.

Congress approved the Administrative Cooperation Directive (DAC8) in October 2025, creating a system far stricter than traditional banking.

Instead of using reporting thresholds like €250,000, DAC8 requires platforms to send every detail to the Tax Agency, even for a €2 transaction.

As this automated surveillance comes online, experts point to private wallets as the last remaining space for crypto “sovereignty.”

Platforms such as Binance Spain and Kraken Ireland must report every transaction to the Tax Agency by 2027, but self-custody remains outside this reporting pipeline.

This shift draws a sharp line for 2026: centralized users will face total transparency and potential asset seizure, while those who keep Bitcoin in personal wallets will retain a rapidly shrinking pocket of legal privacy.

A global divergence

That being said, Spanish regulations aren’t tightening in isolation, but are sharply in contrast with shifting global approaches.

As political groups like Sumar Parliamentary Group push to raise capital gains taxes to 47% and classify all digital assets as seizable, the United States is moving in the opposite direction.

The proposed “Bitcoin for America Act” would let citizens pay federal taxes in Bitcoin [BTC] without triggering capital gains, effectively elevating it to a strategic reserve asset.

This growing gap between Spain’s heavy tax model and more incentive-driven global policies has prompted Spanish service providers and holders to mobilize.

Therefore, as 2026 approaches, the industry is actively working to protect user privacy and prevent investors from relocating to more crypto-friendly jurisdictions, setting the stage for a major battle over the future of digital money in Spain.


Final Thoughts

  • By July 2026, MiCA-compliant rules will force weaker or non-compliant operators to exit the market entirely.
  • This will be the strongest integration yet between blockchain oversight and tax enforcement.
Next: Avantis rallies 24% in a day – Can AVNT squeeze toward $0.40?

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/spain-to-expose-every-crypto-transaction-will-2026-see-the-end-of-privacy/

Market Opportunity
EPNS Logo
EPNS Price(PUSH)
$0.01707
$0.01707$0.01707
-0.40%
USD
EPNS (PUSH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Rappler's Dwight de Leon recaps the challenges faced in 2025 by one of the Philippines' wealthiest families
Share
Rappler2025/12/25 09:00
Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI

The post Nvidia Absorbs Another Rival for $20B, Boosting Decentralized AI appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NVIDIA has agreed to pay approximately $20 billion
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/25 09:16