Bitcoin’s Performance Diverges from Traditional Markets, Raising Questions About Future Trends As Bitcoin continues to underperform compared to gold and major equityBitcoin’s Performance Diverges from Traditional Markets, Raising Questions About Future Trends As Bitcoin continues to underperform compared to gold and major equity

Benjamin Cowen Warns: Bitcoin’s 2023 Setup Mirroring 2019 | What’s Next?

Benjamin Cowen Warns: Bitcoin’s 2023 Setup Mirroring 2019 | What’s Next?

As Bitcoin continues to underperform compared to gold and major equity indices, investors are reassessing whether this cycle is unfolding differently from previous patterns. Analyst Benjamin Cowen provides insights into why Bitcoin’s recent behavior may signal a prolonged phase of stagnation, influenced more by macroeconomic factors than by market hype.

Key Takeaways

  • Bitcoin remains lagging behind gold and stocks, which are responding positively to expectations of future monetary easing.
  • Bitcoin’s sensitivity to actual liquidity conditions, rather than optimism alone, explains its sluggish momentum.
  • Market sentiment around Bitcoin is notably subdued compared to previous cycles marked by retail enthusiasm.
  • Broader macroeconomic headwinds, including labor market trends and restrictive financial conditions, could weigh on Bitcoin into 2026.

Tickers mentioned:
Crypto → BTC, ETH

Sentiment: Neutral

Price impact: Neutral. Bitcoin’s performance appears closely tied to macroeconomic factors and liquidity conditions, which currently limit upward movement.

Market context: The ongoing macroeconomic challenges are influencing crypto trends amidst broader market fluctuations.

Analysis of Bitcoin’s Current Cycle

Despite significant attention, Bitcoin has struggled to maintain upward momentum, unlike previous cycles where retail speculation and enthusiasm drove prices higher. Cowen emphasizes that this divergence is partly because Bitcoin is more responsive to actual liquidity conditions rather than market sentiment or hype. When liquidity tightens or macroeconomic indicators shift, Bitcoin often reacts accordingly, which explains its recent underperformance compared to gold and stocks, both of which have surged amid expectations of easing monetary policy.

Cowen notes that the current climate lacks the macroeconomic catalysts typically needed for Bitcoin to outperform. This contrasts with past bullish phases where favorable macro conditions propelled prices. He also highlights the importance of macro headwinds such as labor market trends and restrictive financial conditions, suggesting these factors may suppress Bitcoin’s growth into 2026, despite occasional short-term rallies.

While some analysts dismiss the relevance of Bitcoin’s traditional four-year cycle, Cowen presents data indicating that market cycles, broader economic data, and macro trends still influence cryptocurrency movements. His outlook advocates patience and a focus on macroeconomic realities instead of relying solely on price predictions. He also mentions that expectations of rapid altcoin rotations may be overly optimistic given the current macro environment.

To gain deeper insights, viewers can watch Cowen’s full interview on the Cointelegraph YouTube channel, where he discusses the macro context, market cycles, and strategic considerations for investors navigating these uncertain times.

This article was originally published as Benjamin Cowen Warns: Bitcoin’s 2023 Setup Mirroring 2019 | What’s Next? on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Market Opportunity
FUTURECOIN Logo
FUTURECOIN Price(FUTURE)
$0.12122
$0.12122$0.12122
0.00%
USD
FUTURECOIN (FUTURE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
WazirX founder confirms that the Indian crypto exchange’s dispute with Binance has escalated to formal litigation

WazirX founder confirms that the Indian crypto exchange’s dispute with Binance has escalated to formal litigation

WazirX founder and CEO Nischal Shetty has confirmed that the Indian crypto exchange’s dispute with Binance has escalated to formal litigation. This has raised concerns
Share
Coinstats2025/12/27 05:45
WazirX founder Nischal Shetty says Binance ownership dispute now in litigation

WazirX founder Nischal Shetty says Binance ownership dispute now in litigation

The post WazirX founder Nischal Shetty says Binance ownership dispute now in litigation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WazirX founder and CEO Nischal Shetty
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/27 05:53