Federal Reserve policymakers can’t seem to agree on when they’ll cut borrowing costs again. Most say further cuts could happen if prices keep cooling, but severalFederal Reserve policymakers can’t seem to agree on when they’ll cut borrowing costs again. Most say further cuts could happen if prices keep cooling, but several

Federal Reserve policymakers can't seem to agree on when they'll cut borrowing costs again

Federal Reserve policymakers can’t seem to agree on when they’ll cut borrowing costs again. Most say further cuts could happen if prices keep cooling, but several officials think rates need to stay put for a while. That’s according to meeting records released Tuesday.

The minutes from the Fed’s December 9-10 gathering showed ongoing disagreements among central bank leaders. While the majority backed another rate reduction last month, the decision wasn’t easy for everyone.

The Fed voted 9-3 to trim its key rate by a quarter point in December. That’s the third cut in a row, bringing the rate down to between 3.5% and 3.75% as previously reported by Cryptopolitan.

“A few of those who supported lowering the policy rate at this meeting indicated that the decision was finely balanced or that they could have supported keeping the target range unchanged,” the minutes stated.

Officials adjusted their statement after the meeting in a way that showed less certainty about the timing for future cuts. Their median forecast had just one quarter-point reduction coming in 2026, though individual predictions were all over the map. Market watchers are betting on at least two cuts next year.

The vote exposed clear rifts

Governor Stephen Miran broke ranks by pushing for a bigger half-point cut. Meanwhile, Austan Goolsbee from the Chicago Fed and Jeff Schmid from Kansas City voted against any reduction. They wanted to leave rates alone.

Things got messier when looking at rate forecasts for 2025. Six out of 19 policymakers showed their opposition to December’s cut by saying rates should end this year at 3.75% to 4%. That’s exactly where they stood before the meeting.

Central bankers are dealing with competing worries about inflation versus jobs. Most officials noted that moving toward lower rates would help prevent serious damage to the job market, according to the minutes.

But others had concerns about prices. Several officials warned that cutting rates while inflation stays high could send the wrong message. People might think the Fed isn’t serious about reaching its 2% inflation target.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell told reporters after the meeting that officials had cut rates enough to protect jobs while keeping them high enough to control prices.

Making decisions proved harder than usual because policymakers didn’t have the typical economic data. A government shutdown ran through October and nearly half of November, which meant less information was available. Officials noted that data coming in over the next few weeks would help guide their choices.

The minutes said some officials who wanted to hold rates steady thought the large amount of job and inflation data coming before the next meeting would be “helpful in making judgments on whether a rate reduction was warranted.”

New information since December hasn’t settled the debate

Unemployment climbed to 4.6% in November, the highest since 2021. Consumer prices rose less than forecasters expected. Both figures support the case for lower rates.

But there’s a catch. The economy expanded at a 4.3% annual pace in the third quarter, the strongest growth in two years. That probably reinforced concerns among officials worried about inflation.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.008804
$0.008804$0.008804
-1.57%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump Media received 260 BTC from Coinbase, worth $21 million.

Trump Media received 260 BTC from Coinbase, worth $21 million.

PANews reported on December 31 that, according to Emmett Gallic, Trump Media received 260 BTC (worth $21 million) from Coinbase between last night and early this
Share
PANews2025/12/31 08:06
Sei Enhances Market Infrastructure with Real-Time Data and Transparency

Sei Enhances Market Infrastructure with Real-Time Data and Transparency

The post Sei Enhances Market Infrastructure with Real-Time Data and Transparency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Rongchai Wang Dec 30, 2025 18:21 Sei introduces
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/31 08:12
FCA, crackdown on crypto

FCA, crackdown on crypto

The post FCA, crackdown on crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United Kingdom enters a decisive phase. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated a consultation to set minimum standards on transparency, consumer protection, and digital custody, in order to strengthen market confidence and ensure safer operations for exchanges, wallets, and crypto service providers. The consultation was published on May 2, 2025, and opened a public discussion on operational responsibilities and safeguarding requirements for digital assets (CoinDesk). The goal is to make the rules clearer without hindering the sector’s evolution. According to the data collected by our regulatory monitoring team, in the first weeks following the publication, the feedback received from professionals and operators focused mainly on custody, incident reporting, and insurance requirements. Industry analysts note that many responses require technical clarifications on multi-sig, asset segregation, and recovery protocols, as well as proposals to scale obligations based on the size of the operator. FCA Consultation: What’s on the Table The consultation document clarifies how to apply rules inspired by traditional finance to the crypto perimeter, balancing innovation, market integrity, and user protection. In this context, the goal is to introduce minimum standards for all firms under the supervision of the FCA, an essential step for a more transparent and secure sector, with measurable benefits for users. The proposed pillars Obligations towards consumers: assessment on the extension of the Consumer Duty – a requirement that mandates companies to provide “good outcomes” – to crypto services, with outcomes for users that are traceable and verifiable. Operational resilience: introduction of continuity requirements, incident response plans, and periodic testing to ensure the operational stability of platforms even in adverse scenarios. Financial Crime Prevention: strengthening AML/CFT measures through more stringent transaction monitoring and structured counterpart checks. Custody and safeguarding: definition of operational methods for the segregation of client assets, secure…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:40