TLDR: Erik Zhang controls the majority of Neo’s treasury and consensus voting power according to Da Hongfei’s claims. Da Hongfei has repeatedly requested transferTLDR: Erik Zhang controls the majority of Neo’s treasury and consensus voting power according to Da Hongfei’s claims. Da Hongfei has repeatedly requested transfer

Neo Co-Founders Clash Over Treasury Control as Da Hongfei Disputes Zhang’s Financial Disclosure Demands

2025/12/31 18:58
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR:

  • Erik Zhang controls the majority of Neo’s treasury and consensus voting power according to Da Hongfei’s claims.
  • Da Hongfei has repeatedly requested transfer of NEO and GAS tokens to multisig addresses since N3 migration.
  • Neo Foundation will release end-of-2025 financial report in Q1 2026 with preliminary figures shared beforehand.
  • Da Hongfei plans to step back from Neo mainnet work on January 1, 2026, to focus on NeoX and SpoonOS projects.

Neo co-founder Erik Zhang has accused Da Hongfei of withholding Neo Foundation financial information. Zhang called for a complete and verifiable financial report from the organization. 

Meanwhile, Da Hongfei responded by stating that Zhang controls the majority of Neo’s treasury funds and consensus voting power. 

The dispute centers on fund custody and governance control within the blockchain project. Da announced plans to release financial figures despite the ongoing controversy between the two co-founders.

Treasury Control and Transfer Delays

Zhang stated that Da Hongfei will reduce his involvement in Neo mainnet operations starting January 1, 2026. 

The co-founder plans to concentrate efforts on NeoX and SpoonOS projects instead. Zhang emphasized the need for transparent financial reporting from the Neo Foundation regarding its operations and fund management.

Da Hongfei countered these claims by pointing to Zhang’s control over treasury assets. In a X post, Da stated that Zhang “controls the super majority of Neo’s treasury” and “dictates the voting of consensus nodes.” 

The response challenged the premise of Zhang’s call for financial disclosure. Da argued that a blockchain project cannot function properly under single-person custody arrangements.

According to Da Hongfei, he has repeatedly requested the transfer of NEO and GAS tokens from Zhang’s personal custody. The proposed solution involved moving these assets to Neo Foundation multisig addresses while keeping Zhang as a key holder. 

However, Da claimed that Zhang “has consistently found excuses to delay this process.” The transfer was reportedly scheduled to complete around the N3 migration timeline but remains pending.

Financial Reporting and Foundation Commitments

Da Hongfei explained his previous silence on custody issues was intended to maintain community confidence. He hoped for an orderly resolution through private discussions. 

However, the public dispute has now forced transparency on these internal governance matters. Da expressed regret for not addressing the situation earlier through public channels.

The Neo Foundation will release an end-of-2025 financial report during the first quarter of 2026. Da committed to sharing preliminary financial figures as they become available before the full report. 

Nevertheless, he clarified that this disclosure should not validate Zhang’s framing of the governance dispute. Instead, the report will demonstrate the actual distribution of project resources and control.

Da Hongfei reaffirmed his commitment to the blockchain project he helped create. He stated that Neo Foundation will maintain strict fiscal discipline given current resource limitations. 

The foundation plans to pursue the treasury custody transfer through all available methods. Da emphasized that neither he nor the foundation will abandon the project or its community despite the ongoing disputes.

The post Neo Co-Founders Clash Over Treasury Control as Da Hongfei Disputes Zhang’s Financial Disclosure Demands appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
NEO Logo
NEO Price(NEO)
$2.478
$2.478$2.478
-0.40%
USD
NEO (NEO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Why More Startups Are Automating Their HR Processes in 2025

Why More Startups Are Automating Their HR Processes in 2025

  Startups in 2025 are moving faster than ever. With lean teams, remote workforces, and aggressive growth goals, manual HR management no longer fits the modern
Share
Techbullion2026/03/08 15:29
Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand

Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand

The post Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SHIB exchange flow is hinting
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/08 15:30