Aave Labs to Submit Governance Proposal on Revenue and IP Ownership

TLDR

• Aave Labs will propose sharing off-protocol revenue with AAVE holders.

• AAVE price rose over 10% following the governance alignment update.

• The proposal will address branding ownership and safeguard mechanisms.

• Aave DAO members demand enforceable rules after weeks of internal disputes.

Aave Labs announced plans to submit a formal governance proposal exploring how off-protocol revenue could be shared with AAVE token holders. The announcement was made on January 2 and quickly boosted AAVE’s price by more than 10%, as market participants welcomed signs of improved alignment between the development team and the decentralized governance community.

The revenue being considered includes income from Aave’s front-end app, swap integrations, and other future product lines not directly tied to the core lending protocol. Aave founder Stani Kulechov confirmed that the initiative aims to align long-term incentives between Aave Labs and the DAO.

Proposal to Cover Governance, Branding, and DAO Safeguards

The upcoming proposal will also address control over Aave’s branding and digital assets. This includes websites, social media accounts, and front-end gateways that represent the public image of Aave. The goal is to clarify who owns these assets and what restrictions apply when monetizing or modifying them.

DAO members have called for Aave Labs to relinquish some branding control to ensure decentralized ownership and transparency. The proposal is expected to outline guidelines for usage and establish rules for any commercial deployment of brand assets.

In addition, the proposal will introduce governance safeguards intended to prevent abrupt or unilateral decisions that could affect tokenholders. Aave Labs said the safeguards will protect DAO decision-making while allowing teams to build independently on top of the protocol.

Background of DAO Disputes and Market Reaction

The announcement follows several weeks of disagreement within the Aave ecosystem, where DAO delegates raised concerns about transparency and centralization. Specific issues included a prior decision by Aave Labs to reroute frontend fees away from the DAO, which triggered criticism from some tokenholders.

Delegates said that governance uncertainty and unclear ownership structures were contributing to AAVE’s declining market performance. The new statement from Aave Labs has been seen as a shift toward reconciliation.

DAO representatives have welcomed the update but emphasized the need for enforceable commitments. “Vague promises are not enough,” one DAO contributor said, urging for binding agreements and transparent frameworks.

Long-Term Goals and Aave’s Expansion Plans

Beyond revenue sharing, Aave Labs said it wants to support broader use cases, such as real-world assets, consumer-facing financial tools, and institutional lending. These efforts would be linked to future upgrades like Aave V4 and expanded use of the GHO stablecoin.

Kulechov stated that the most effective path is to let independent teams build products using the permissionless protocol, while the DAO captures value through increased usage.

A governance vote will soon be held to decide whether the proposed framework moves forward. If approved, it may reshape the relationship between Aave Labs and the DAO while supporting a more decentralized structure.