This study introduces the Instance-Aware Index Advisor (IA2), employing the TD3-TD-SWAR model for efficient index selection in databases. Demonstrated through TPCThis study introduces the Instance-Aware Index Advisor (IA2), employing the TD3-TD-SWAR model for efficient index selection in databases. Demonstrated through TPC

Beyond TPC-H: Scaling IA2 for Real-World Database Optimization

Abstract and 1. Introduction

  1. Related Works

    2.1 Traditional Index Selection Approaches

    2.2 RL-based Index Selection Approaches

  2. Index Selection Problem

  3. Methodology

    4.1 Formulation of the DRL Problem

    4.2 Instance-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Index Selection

  4. System Framework of IA2

    5.1 Preprocessing Phase

    5.2 RL Training and Application Phase

  5. Experiments

    6.1 Experimental Setting

    6.2 Experimental Results

    6.3 End-to-End Performance Comparison

    6.4 Key Insights

  6. Conclusion and Future Work, and References

7 Conclusion and Future Work

This study introduces the Instance-Aware Index Advisor (IA2), employing the TD3-TD-SWAR model for efficient index selection in databases, showcasing adept handling of complex dependencies and generalization to unseen workloads. Demonstrated through TPC-H benchmarks, IA2 achieves superior efficiency, setting a new standard in index configuration optimization across varied database environments.

\ Future iterations of this work will aim to expand the discussion on the index choices across IA2 and comparative systems, delving into the nuances of performance differences across various workloads and training epochs. Testing IA2 on a broader set of workloads beyond the TPC-H benchmark and exploring its performance in dynamically changing environments are pivotal steps forward. Such explorations will not only validate IA2’s adaptability and efficiency but also enhance its applicability across diverse database environments. Acknowledging the current evaluation’s focus and the limitation in workload diversity, additional evaluations on a more expansive range of real-world workloads and database schemas are planned. Furthermore, exploring compression technologies to enhance IA2’s scalability represents a crucial area of development. These future directions aim to broaden IA2’s effectiveness and applicability in diverse database scenarios, ensuring its readiness for the dynamic and varied demands of contemporary database systems and paving the way for more resilient, efficient, and intelligent database optimization strategies.

References

[1] Surajit Chaudhuri and Vivek R Narasayya. 1997. An efficient, costdriven index selection tool for Microsoft SQL server. In VLDB, Vol. 97. San Francisco, 146–155.

\ [2] Debabrata Dash, Neoklis Polyzotis, and Anastasia Ailamaki. 2011. Cophy: A scalable, portable, and interactive index advisor for large workloads. arXiv preprint arXiv:1104.3214 (2011).

\ [3] Scott Fujimoto, Herke Van Hoof, and David Meger. 2018. Addressing function approximation error in actor-critic methods. arXiv:1802.09477 (2018).

\ [4] Vijay R Konda and John N Tsitsiklis. 2000. Actor-critic algorithms. In NeurIPS.

\ [5] Jan Kossmann, Stefan Halfpap, Marcel Jankrift, and Rainer Schlosser. 2020. Magic mirror in my hand, which is the best in the land? an experimental evaluation of index selection algorithms. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 13, 12 (2020), 2382–2395.

\ [6] Jan Kossmann, Alexander Kastius, and Rainer Schlosser. 2022. SWIRL: Selection of Workload-aware Indexes using Reinforcement Learning.. In EDBT. 2–155.

\ [7] Hai Lan, Zhifeng Bao, and Yuwei Peng. 2020. An index advisor using deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2105– 2108.

\ [8] Vincent Y Lum and Huei Ling. 1971. An optimization problem on the selection of secondary keys. In Proceedings of the 1971 26th annual conference. 349–356.

\ [9] Stratos Papadomanolakis and Anastassia Ailamaki. 2007. An integer linear programming approach to database design. In 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop. IEEE, 442–449.

\ [10] Zahra Sadri, Le Gruenwald, and Eleazar Lead. 2020. DRLindex: deep reinforcement learning index advisor for a cluster database. In Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on International Database Engineering & Applications. 1–8.

\ [11] Rainer Schlosser, Jan Kossmann, and Martin Boissier. 2019. Efficient scalable multi-attribute index selection using recursive strategies. In 2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 1238–1249.

\ [12] Hao Sun and Taiyi Wang. 2022. Toward Causal-Aware RL: State-Wise Action-Refined Temporal Difference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.00354 (2022).

\ [13] Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. 2018. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press.

\ [14] Gary Valentin, Michael Zuliani, Daniel C Zilio, Guy Lohman, and Alan Skelley. 2000. DB2 advisor: An optimizer smart enough to recommend its own indexes. In Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Data Engineering (Cat. No. 00CB37073). IEEE, 101–110.

\ [15] Jinsung Yoon, James Jordon, and Mihaela van der Schaar. 2018. INVASE: Instance-wise variable selection using neural networks. In ICLR.

\

:::info Authors:

(1) Taiyi Wang, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (Taiyi.Wang@cl.cam.ac.uk);

(2) Eiko Yoneki, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (eiko.yoneki@cl.cam.ac.uk).

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed (Attribution-Noncommercial-Sharelike 4.0 International) license.

:::

\

Market Opportunity
Humanity Logo
Humanity Price(H)
$0.16826
$0.16826$0.16826
+1.71%
USD
Humanity (H) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Vitalik: The crypto industry needs to address three major issues to develop better decentralized stablecoins.

Vitalik: The crypto industry needs to address three major issues to develop better decentralized stablecoins.

PANews reported on January 11 that Vitalik Buterin stated that the crypto industry currently needs better decentralized stablecoins, and three issues remain to
Share
PANews2026/01/11 15:47
Yingda Securities: The RMB exchange rate is likely to appreciate steadily in 2026.

Yingda Securities: The RMB exchange rate is likely to appreciate steadily in 2026.

PANews reported on January 11 that, according to Zhitong Finance, the 2026 China Chief Economist Forum Annual Meeting was held in Shanghai from January 10-11, with
Share
PANews2026/01/11 15:51