Cardano founder Charles Hoskinos issues a warning that AI poses a bigger threat to crypto security than quantum computing, which poses a threat to the industry Cardano founder Charles Hoskinos issues a warning that AI poses a bigger threat to crypto security than quantum computing, which poses a threat to the industry

AI vs Quantum: Hoskinson’s Stark Crypto Warning

 Cardano founder Charles Hoskinos issues a warning that AI poses a bigger threat to crypto security than quantum computing, which poses a threat to the industry. 

A controversial warning about the security of cryptocurrency was provided by Hoskinson, who stated that AI is a more significant threat than quantum computing.  

He said this in an interview with Coindesk, criticizing the obsession of the crypto community with quantum computing.  

The Real Threat Nobody’s Talking About

Although quantum computing takes up most of the security news in blockchain, Hoskinson sees these issues to be exaggerated timing problems.  

On X, CryptosR Us tweeted that Hoskinson indicated that quantum threats are, primarily, an issue of timing and cost. Hardening solutions are already available in the industry; performance trade-offs delay deployment longer than technical constraints.  

Source:  CryptosR_Us

However, AI poses another challenge. It is currently transforming the way developers are constructing cryptocurrency systems nowadays.  

Why AI Keeps Hoskinson Up at Night

Cryptocurrency developers are delivering complicated systems without knowing them properly. AI-aided code produces code that appears to work and tests well.  

These hidden case edges slip up undetected, and the security assumptions fail silently on the backdoor. Issues remain unseen until disastrous breakdowns occur.  

CryptosR Us on X posted the warning issued by Hoskinson, who noted that the attack surfaces grow without anyone paying attention to this fact, resulting in a never-before-seen vulnerability of the entire ecosystem.  

This transformation alters the basic development dynamics. Teams that are dependent on AI tools overlook important security aspects, undermining the traditionally high engineering standards as more and more becomes automated.  

You might also like: US Senators Introduce Bill to Protect Crypto Developers

The Coming Industry Divide

Hoskinson anticipates that a dramatic performance gap will arise among development teams. AI will be employed to provide faster and stronger security in elite engineering teams.  

Big, gassy organizations will not be able to compete, and the rift between serious and AI-reliant builders will become clear.  

In the short run, the future will involve increased security incidents. The industry will be more robust in the long run as it adapts, and teams that do not see AI as a productivity benefit will suffer dire outcomes.  

Hoskinson emphasized that AI is an opportunity and a risk; a lack of consideration of the risk exposes organizations to exploitation.  

The cryptocurrency sector is at a crossroads. Quantum computing is a future issue whose answer is known, and AI is already transforming how development is done, with unpredictable security consequences.

The post AI vs Quantum: Hoskinson’s Stark Crypto Warning appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.04259
$0.04259$0.04259
+1.42%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15