India’s Crypto Industry Advocates for Tax Reforms Ahead of Union Budget As India prepares to unveil its Union Budget in February, the country’s burgeoning cryptoIndia’s Crypto Industry Advocates for Tax Reforms Ahead of Union Budget As India prepares to unveil its Union Budget in February, the country’s burgeoning crypto

Indian Crypto Exchanges Urge Tax Reforms Ahead of Union Budget 2023

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
Indian Crypto Exchanges Urge Tax Reforms Ahead Of Union Budget 2023

India’s Crypto Industry Advocates for Tax Reforms Ahead of Union Budget

As India prepares to unveil its Union Budget in February, the country’s burgeoning crypto sector is urging policymakers to reconsider current tax regulations, which industry insiders believe hinder growth and innovation. The push for reform comes amid tightening regulatory compliance and rising concerns about the long-term sustainability of the existing framework.

Key Takeaways

  • Current crypto tax policies impose a flat 30% tax on gains and a 1% tax deducted at source on all transactions.
  • Industry leaders argue that the taxes, especially at the transaction level, discourage onshore activity and advanced compliance efforts.
  • Officials believe that reforms could foster better compliance and bolster domestic digital asset markets.
  • Stricter enforcement measures are prompting exchanges to seek balanced regulatory approaches to protect investor interests while promoting innovation.

Tickers mentioned: None

Sentiment: Neutral

Price impact: Neutral. Regulatory clarity could stabilize the market but remains uncertain until policies are finalized.

Market context: India’s crypto sector is at a crossroads, with increased calls for reform amid global trends toward more progressive regulation and domestic enforcement tightening.

Revisiting the Indian Crypto Tax Framework

India’s current tax regime for cryptocurrencies, introduced in 2022, enforces a 30% tax on any gains, alongside a 1% tax deducted at source applicable to most transactions, regardless of profitability. Significantly, losses from trading cannot currently offset gains, further complicating traders’ and investors’ strategies. The industry contends that such a regime stifles innovation and liquidity by making compliance overly burdensome and discouraging participation in the onshore market.

Executives from leading domestic exchanges emphasize that the existing tax measures, especially the transaction-level levies, do not align with the evolution of global digital assets markets nor India’s own progress in regulating the sector. Nischal Shetty, founder of WazirX, states that the upcoming Budget offers a prime opportunity to recalibrate policies to foster transparency and innovation.

“India has a chance to refine its framework to better support compliance while encouraging growth,” Shetty said. He advocates for a thoughtful reduction in the transaction-based TDS and a reassessment of loss-set-off rules to restore liquidity and sustain economic activity domestically.

Similarly, ZebPay’s COO Raj Karkara believes that a rational approach to reducing taxes and refining the existing 1% TDS could make the sector more attractive and foster a healthier onshore ecosystem. Sectors such as Binance’s APAC lead, SB Seker, also suggest that focusing on capital gains with limited loss offsets and eliminating excessive transaction levies would signal a move away from a punitive “tax-and-deter” regime, fostering responsible investment and growth.

Challenges from Increased Enforcement

Amid calls for reform, Indian authorities have intensified compliance requirements for crypto platforms. Recent directives from the Financial Intelligence Unit mandate stringent KYC procedures, including live selfie verification, geolocation tracking, and bank account authentication. Concurrently, the income tax department has raised alarms about the challenges posed by offshore exchanges, private wallets, and decentralized finance tools in tracking taxable crypto income, highlighting ongoing enforcement efforts.

These developments underscore the tension between regulatory oversight and the sector’s growth ambitions, with many industry stakeholders advocating for balanced reforms that support innovation while ensuring compliance and investor protection.

This article was originally published as Indian Crypto Exchanges Urge Tax Reforms Ahead of Union Budget 2023 on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Market Opportunity
Believe Logo
Believe Price(BELIEVE)
$0.001265
$0.001265$0.001265
-2.91%
USD
Believe (BELIEVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Trump's allegation against Noem would constitute a federal crime: analyst

Trump's allegation against Noem would constitute a federal crime: analyst

President Donald Trump caught everyone off guard by suddenly firing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem — but being out of a job could just be the start of
Share
Rawstory2026/03/06 04:49
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28