Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for a rethink of decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) design, arguing that most DAOs remain stuck in a shallowEthereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for a rethink of decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) design, arguing that most DAOs remain stuck in a shallow

Vitalik Buterin Pushes New DAO Models for Courts, Oracles, Governance

  • Vitalik stated that most DAOS resemble token voting treasuries and don’t do much in terms of preventing capture or inefficiency.
  • His hope for DAOs is to use the technology behind oracle services, on-chain courts, scam lists, and stewardship.
  • The addition of privacy tools and AI-based delegation can increase voters’ turnout, and yet the DAO governance framework requires a better design.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for a rethink of decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) design, arguing that most DAOs remain stuck in a shallow model that fails to fix the weaknesses of politics and corporate governance. In a Monday post on X, Buterin said today’s DAO blueprint often amounts to “a treasury controlled by token holder voting,” and the sector needs to move beyond that default.

Buterin warned that the standard treasury-and-token-vote structure has spread widely because it is simple to deploy. However, he said it delivers weak outcomes. It breeds inefficient decision-making, is liable to governance capture, and fails to deliver improved fairness or accountability. His perspective is that DAOs must migrate towards governance infrastructure rather than mere tokenized treasuries.

DAOs should power core infrastructure, not just treasuries

Buterin outlined a broader vision in which DAOs take responsibility for infrastructure that requires collective coordination and credible neutrality. He highlighted three major targets: better oracles, on-chain dispute resolution, and long-term project stewardship.

Oracles often decide what “truth” enters a blockchain system, which makes them central to DeFi, insurance, and settlement. On the other hand, the matter of dispute resolution is relevant whenever there is a need for subjective assessment in those agreements that happen on-chain, for instance, in insurance disputes, fraud cases, or in matters of the delivery of services. According to Buterin, DAOs can solve these challenges by proper design in their governance instead of relying solely on token votes for legitimacy.

He also pointed to governance use cases that demand continuous curation. DAOs could maintain shared lists such as anti-scam registries, build common formats for short-term funding vehicles, and preserve protocols after their original teams disappear. These functions matter for crypto’s long-term resilience, especially as many projects lose contributors after early hype cycles fade.

“Concave vs convex” governance offers a design framework

Buterin framed his argument around his earlier “convex vs concave” governance lens. He said different types of problems require different kinds of governance.

For concave problems, compromise is better than a coin flip. These decisions benefit from wide input, diverse views, and high robustness. In this case, DAOs should focus on aggregation mechanisms that pull signals from many participants while resisting manipulation.

For convex problems, a decisive bet can outperform slow consensus. Buterin said DAOs should allow strong leadership in these cases. Rather than attempting to supplant leadership through decentralization, DAOs can utilize the concept of decentralization to make leaders accountable.

This approach has implications because, in it, one-size-fits-all governance does not work. Buterin wants developers to consider the architecture of governance as something serious in the area of engineering.

Privacy and decision fatigue block DAO performance

Buterin also warned that DAOs will fail unless they solve two structural issues: privacy and participation fatigue.

Without privacy, governance turns into a social game. Participants vote based on status, influence, and pressure rather than honest preferences. Buterin pointed to zero-knowledge proofs as a core tool to protect voter privacy. He also mentioned secure multi-party computation and fully homomorphic encryption as possible approaches in some cases.

Decision fatigue creates another major failure mode. If DAOs require constant voting, turnout collapses after early enthusiasm. Buterin suggested that AI could help reduce fatigue by supporting analysis or enabling delegation to locally controlled models. However, he cautioned against allowing AI to run DAOs directly.

Next-gen DAOs must address whale capture

Buterin’s comments land as DAO ecosystems expand while still struggling with low turnout and token concentration. DAO tokens now hold a market capitalization of at least $17.5 billion, but many governance systems still rely on a narrow set of active voters.

Buterin argued that teams building new governance systems should treat DAO design and the communication layer around it as “50% of their job, not 10%,” especially if Ethereum’s decentralized base layer is meant to carry into the applications built above it.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Canaan Risks Nasdaq Delisting as Shares Slip Below $1 Again

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token

Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token

The post Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wormhole is changing how its W token works by creating a new reserve designed to hold value for the long term. Announced on Wednesday, the Wormhole Reserve will collect onchain and offchain revenues and other value generated across the protocol and its applications (including Portal) and accumulate them into W, locking the tokens within the reserve. The reserve is part of a broader update called W 2.0. Other changes include a 4% targeted base yield for tokenholders who stake and take part in governance. While staking rewards will vary, Wormhole said active users of ecosystem apps can earn boosted yields through features like Portal Earn. The team stressed that no new tokens are being minted; rewards come from existing supply and protocol revenues, keeping the cap fixed at 10 billion. Wormhole is also overhauling its token release schedule. Instead of releasing large amounts of W at once under the old “cliff” model, the network will shift to steady, bi-weekly unlocks starting October 3, 2025. The aim is to avoid sharp periods of selling pressure and create a more predictable environment for investors. Lockups for some groups, including validators and investors, will extend an additional six months, until October 2028. Core contributor tokens remain under longer contractual time locks. Wormhole launched in 2020 as a cross-chain bridge and now connects more than 40 blockchains. The W token powers governance and staking, with a capped supply of 10 billion. By redirecting fees and revenues into the new reserve, Wormhole is betting that its token can maintain value as demand for moving assets and data between chains grows. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/wormhole-launches-reserve
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:55
XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

Vet has explained that he has decided to veto the Token Escrow amendment to prevent breaking things
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:28
MakinaFi suffered an attack that resulted in the loss of approximately 1299 ETH, with some funds being preemptively processed by MEV.

MakinaFi suffered an attack that resulted in the loss of approximately 1299 ETH, with some funds being preemptively processed by MEV.

PANews reported on January 20th that, according to PeckShieldAlert, the MakinaFi platform was attacked, with hackers stealing approximately 1,299 ETH, worth about
Share
PANews2026/01/20 12:32