According to Brian Armstrong, the current financial system systematically favors those who already control capital, while leaving most people locked […] The postAccording to Brian Armstrong, the current financial system systematically favors those who already control capital, while leaving most people locked […] The post

Brian Armstrong Pushes Tokenization as a Fix for Market Inequality

2026/01/20 22:30

According to Brian Armstrong, the current financial system systematically favors those who already control capital, while leaving most people locked out of the most profitable markets.

Key takeaways:

  • Capital income has grown far faster than wages, widening the wealth gap
  • Access to top-performing financial markets is limited by geography, regulation, and cost
  • Structural barriers, not individual choices, drive much of the inequality
  • Tokenization is presented as a way to open global markets to broader participation

At the core of the issue is a widening gap between labor and capital. Wages have grown slowly over decades, while returns on assets such as equities and private investments have surged. As a result, individuals who rely primarily on income from work struggle to keep pace with those whose wealth compounds through market exposure. Access itself has become a barrier, with many of the highest-performing financial opportunities either restricted, geographically limited, or priced beyond the reach of average participants.

Armstrong argues that this imbalance is not merely economic, but structural. Traditional capital markets are fragmented by borders, regulation, and minimum investment thresholds. For billions of people, participation is either impossible or impractical, meaning global wealth creation increasingly concentrates among a relatively small group with the right access and resources.

Tokenization as a Structural Reset

In response, Coinbase has released a detailed research paper outlining how tokenization could change this dynamic. The idea is straightforward but far-reaching: by representing real-world assets as blockchain-based tokens, markets can become more open, divisible, and globally accessible.

READ MORE:

Vitalik Buterin Says Today’s DAOs Are Not Good Enough

Tokenization lowers entry barriers by enabling fractional ownership and continuous access, allowing individuals to gain exposure to assets that were previously reserved for institutions or high-net-worth investors. It also reduces geographic friction, turning fragmented local markets into global ones that operate around the clock.

From Armstrong’s perspective, this shift could fundamentally alter how wealth is created. Instead of capital markets overwhelmingly rewarding those who already have scale, tokenized systems could broaden participation in value creation regardless of location or starting capital. In that sense, tokenization is framed less as a technological upgrade and more as a mechanism for equalizing opportunity.

While regulatory clarity and careful implementation remain necessary, the message is clear: without structural reform, the divide between capital owners and wage earners is likely to keep widening. Tokenization, Armstrong argues, offers a credible path toward markets where access is defined by participation rather than privilege.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post Brian Armstrong Pushes Tokenization as a Fix for Market Inequality appeared first on Coindoo.

Market Opportunity
ConstitutionDAO Logo
ConstitutionDAO Price(PEOPLE)
$0.009326
$0.009326$0.009326
-1.67%
USD
ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37