South Korean Prosecutors Probe $49M Bitcoin Loss From State Custody

• The Gwangju District Prosecutors of South Korea agreed that an internal investigation is going on but did not agree to comment on the exact valuation.
• As per the local media, the total loss stood at around $48 million to $49 million. 

The prosecutor from South Korea is investigating the disappearance of Bitcoin captured from government custody. A lot of Bitcoins were missing at the time of the storage and management process of prosecutors. 

As per the internal reviews, it was reported that the incident is believed to have occurred in mid-2025. The initial findings show that it was due to a phishing attack instead of an external hack of state systems, the report mentioned. 

The private key passwords were stored on a portable USB device as per the officials. At the time of routine inspection, an employee accessed a fraudulent website, which led to the credentials being exposed to third parties, as per the findings. 

The Bitcoin was moved irreversibly after the private keys were compromised, and there was no path for recovery. The officials have not revealed the exact amount of Bitcoin involved. As per the local media, the total loss stood at around $48 million to $49 million. 

The Gwangju District Prosecutors of South Korea agreed that an internal investigation is going on but did not agree to comment on the exact valuation or operational details, quoting the current nature of the probe. 

Prosecutors Choose Not To Give Exact Valuation 

Any public information has not been released concerning disciplinary action or changes to the custody process. At the beginning of this month, the Supreme Court of South Korea issued a ruling approving that Bitcoin held on centralised exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb be named as “seizable property” under the Criminal Procedure Act. 

The decision was made on previous precedents from 2018 and 2021, which identified cryptocurrency as intangible property having economic value, widening the authority of the state to confiscate digital assets in criminal cases.

The event has brought questions regarding technical preparedness to head digital property by government agencies. The crypto custody needs operational security, limited key management, and isolation from the daily computing environment, as per the industry standards. 

Highlighted Crypto News Today: 

F/m Investments Seeks SEC Approval to Tokenize Treasury ETF Shares