Buried underneath this weekend's revelations from the Jeffrey Epstein files is a scandal so large that it would consume President Donald Trump's administration Buried underneath this weekend's revelations from the Jeffrey Epstein files is a scandal so large that it would consume President Donald Trump's administration

Analysts thrash Republicans for helping Trump avoid a 'gigantic' scandal: 'Mind-boggling'

2026/02/02 04:29
10 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Buried underneath this weekend's revelations from the Jeffrey Epstein files is a scandal so large that it would consume President Donald Trump's administration if Republicans weren't actively working to shield the president from accountability, according to analysts.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday morning that a lieutenant to a member of the United Arab Emirates' royal family secretly invested $500 million in Trump's "fledgling" World Liberty Financial cryptocurrency company. The investment occurred after the Trump administration approved the sale of artificial intelligence chips to the country, which had previously been denied due to national security concerns.

"The deal marked something unprecedented in American politics: a foreign government official taking a major ownership stake in an incoming U.S. president’s company," the report reads.

Following the report's publication, political analysts and observers thrashed Republicans in Congress for helping Trump cover up his misdeeds.

"In any other time or presidency, this story. reported by @WSJ, would be an earthquake of a scandal," Davis Axlerod, CNN's chief political analyst, posted on X. "The size, scope and implications of it are unprecedented and mind-boggling. But will this Congress, which brayed endlessly about the "Biden crime family," probe it? Not a chance.

"In part because the House Oversight chair is running for Kentucky governor in 2027, would never do anything to touch Trump and hurt his chances in [the] primary," Jonathan Miller, Politico's senior political columnist, posted on X.

"Freedom Bribes," author John Fugelslang posted on X.

"In ANY other circumstance, this would be a gigantic potential scandal, worthy of immediate congressional hearings," author Bill Carter posted on X. "Quid pro quo implications are massive. Will it even spur serious investigation? Certainly not by Trump-owned DOJ."

"He’s a fire hose of impeachable and criminal offenses," former journalist Jorge Gonzalez posted on X. "The country is numb to it. His secret has always been to overwhelm the public with insanity."

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) accused Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday of lying about an effort of several lawmakers to review unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files, an alleged lie that Massie subsequently provided “receipts” to disprove.

Blanche appeared on ABC News Friday morning to discuss the Justice Department’s recent release of around 3.5 million Epstein files, and to push back against critics who accused the DOJ of unlawfully withholding millions more.

Blanche also fired off at Massie – the co-sponsor along with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the legislation that forced the DOJ to release the Epstein files – for what he alleged was a performative request to view unredacted Epstein files.

“Apparently, Massie and others wrote a letter to come and review unredacted materials. I didn't get that letter yet!” Blanche told ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos.

“They leaked it to the press before they actually sent it to me, but yea, that's absolutely, totally fine, we have nothing to hide. We have nothing to hide, we never did, and our doors are open if they want to come and review any of the materials that we produced.”

Writing on social media, Massie insisted he and others had sent Blanche the request on Friday, and warned that “receipts” were “incoming.” Massie made good on that pledge by later releasing a screenshot of an alleged email sent to a DOJ government email address on Friday, 5:13 p.m. with the subject: “Reps. Khanna and Massie Letter Request to Review the Epstein Files.”

It’s unknown whether Blanche was made aware of the emailed request from Massie and others. Massie has remained dedicated to forcing the Trump administration to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which has already been defied with the DOJ’s botched releases of Epstein files that included redactions beyond what the law permits.
CONTINUE READINGShow less

Donald Trump has a "guillotine" above Kristi Noem's head in the form of false stories he has likely been planting about her in the media, according to a former DHS insider.

Former Homeland Security official Miles Taylor, who has claimed his home was targeted by a break-in shortly after he published a scathing "Anonymous" op-ed about Trump's presidency, appeared on MS NOW over the weekend to talk about his former agency.

Specifically, he was asked why Trump is keeping Noem around despite reports saying she might be fired. While Taylor didn't know that answer, he did note that in the first Trump administration, Trump and his allies would leak false stories about people getting fired all the time.

"Well, he did a little bit of this in the first term. Donald Trump and his aides were the source of leaks about people they were going to potentially fire. They did that on purpose. I mean, people at the White House told me at the time they did that on purpose to keep cabinet secretaries on their toes so they would intentionally leak stories that they were maybe going to fire someone just to make sure that that person stayed loyal to the president," he said on Sunday. "Now, I don't know, in this case, if the past couple of months Donald Trump has been the one leaking the stories about potentially firing several people in his cabinet, but I strongly suspect based on the first term he or his staff were, and then he goes out there and denies that they're going to get rid of people, but they do that to make sure that those cabinet members know that the guillotine is raised above them, so that they don't make any false moves so that they don't contradict the president, and so that they are loyal. This, he felt like, worked decently well in the first term. He's deploying it again in a second."

CONTINUE READINGShow less

If you thought that President Donald Trump and Georgia Republican candidates for higher office have left the 2020 election in the rearview mirror, think again.

Federal agents on Wednesday were seen seizing records from Fulton County’s election center warehouse as the president continues echoing false claims surrounding his 2020 loss to Democrat Joe Biden. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Justice Department have not provided a reason for the raid, but a U.S. magistrate judge signed off on a warrant allowing agents to access a trove of information from ballots to voter rolls.

It doesn’t appear that county or state officials had advanced notice of Wednesday’s raid at the 600,000-square-foot facility in Union City, which is used as a polling place, a site for county election board meetings and a storage facility for ballots and information about Fulton voters.

Concerns about election security are not new in Georgia’s most populous county, which includes Atlanta and routinely gives overwhelming support to Democratic presidential and statewide candidates. But this week’s raid is a major escalation in a years-long battle over election integrity — one that appears to be emerging as more of a political litmus test.

“This is a blatant attempt to distract from the Trump-authorized state violence that killed multiple Americans in Minnesota,” said Democrat Dana Barrett, a Fulton County commissioner who is also running for Secretary of State.

“Sending 25 FBI agents to raid our Fulton County elections office is political theater and part of a concerted effort to take over elections in swing districts across the country.”

The raid comes as the 2026 Republican primary for governor, which features many of the same Republicans who sparred over that year’s election results, is starting to heat up. Both Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and Attorney General Chris Carr have repeatedly vouched for Georgia’s 2020 tally and refused to join any attempts to subvert it, putting them on a collision course with MAGA world over their loyalty to President Donald Trump as they campaign for the state’s top job.

Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, who is running with the president’s endorsement, praised Wednesday’s raid and offered us a preview of what we will likely soon see in his doom-and-gloom campaign commercials.

“Fulton County Elections couldn’t run a bake sale,” Jones said on social media Wednesday. “And unfortunately, our Secretary of State hasn’t fixed the corruption and our Attorney General hasn’t prosecuted it.”

In the months and weeks leading up to the November 2020 vote, Trump’s repeated warnings of potential nefarious activity in that year’s election became part of his rhetoric. Georgia would emerge as the epicenter of the president’s claims of election fraud, even after multiple hand recounts and lawsuits confirmed Biden’s ultimate victory.

His allies in the state Legislature urged leaders to call a special session to reallocate Georgia’s 16 electoral votes. Some Republicans, including Jones, signed a certificate designating themselves as the “electors” who officially vote for president and vice president. And Trump’s January 2021 phone call to Raffensperger, where he urged the secretary to “find” enough votes to erase his defeat, was at the heart of Fulton County’s election racketeering case against Trump and his allies.

The case was dismissed late last year.

Nevertheless, Trump’s claims of fraud have become a key pillar in his party’s political identity: More than half of Republicans in Congress still objected to the certification of Trump’s defeat in the hours following the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. A 2024 national poll from the University of Massachusetts Amherst found that roughly three in ten voters still had questions about the validity of Biden’s win three years prior, a glaring sign of just how mainstream that belief has become among the general public.

Six years later, Trump’s return to the White House hasn’t helped him move on. He continues to say in remarks and at campaign events that he carried the Peach State “three times.” His now-infamous Fulton County mugshot hangs right outside the Oval Office. And he warned of prosecutions against election officials during a speech in Davos this month.

“[Russia’s war with Ukraine] should have never started and it wouldn’t have started if the 2020 U.S. presidential election weren’t rigged. It was a rigged election,” Trump said. “Everybody now knows that. They found out. People will soon be prosecuted for what they did. That’s probably breaking news.”

It’s clear that the past is still very much shaping the present in Georgia Republican politics. This week’s federal raid on the Fulton elections center just adds more fuel to old grudge matches, and a politician’s role in the 2020 election could ultimately determine their political standing.

For candidates like Carr and Raffensperger, the primary could be a test of whether or not there is a political price to pay for defending Georgia’s election results against the barrage of attacks and conspiracy theories. And for Jones, it’s a test of whether election denialism is still an effective political attack for MAGA-aligned candidates to use.

  • Niles Francis recently graduated from Georgia Southern University with a degree in political science and journalism. He has spent the last few years observing and writing about the political maneuvering at Georgia’s state Capitol and regularly publishes updates in a Substack newsletter called Peach State Politics. He is currently studying to earn a graduate degree and is eager to cover another exciting political year in the battleground state where he was born and raised.
CONTINUE READINGShow less
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.