PANews reported on August 6th that, according to Decrypt, Amanda Fischer, former chief of staff under former SEC Chairman Gary Gensler, stated on Monday that liquidity staking could trigger aPANews reported on August 6th that, according to Decrypt, Amanda Fischer, former chief of staff under former SEC Chairman Gary Gensler, stated on Monday that liquidity staking could trigger a

The former SEC chief of staff compared liquidity pledges to the Lehman Brothers incident, and the crypto industry hit back

2025/08/06 10:56

PANews reported on August 6th that, according to Decrypt, Amanda Fischer, former chief of staff under former SEC Chairman Gary Gensler, stated on Monday that liquidity staking could trigger a Lehman Brothers-style collapse in the cryptocurrency market. She claimed the SEC's stance is "endorsing double-collateralization" because liquidity staking creates synthetic tokens through intermediaries, allowing assets to be reused and amplifying risks due to decentralization, similar to the practices used by Lehman Brothers. This statement was strongly refuted by the cryptocurrency industry.

Expert Austin Campbell believes that many policymakers still view cryptocurrencies with outdated perspectives, and that the key to regulation lies in understanding who controls it. Blockchain lawyer Kurt Watkins claims Fischer's interpretation is exaggerated, and that the SEC's focus is on specific liquidity staking arrangements. Fischer's post also drew criticism from prominent figures in the cryptocurrency space, with some calling him self-contradictory, others claiming he misleads the public, and others stating he either lacks understanding or is deliberately playing dumb. Fischer currently works for Better Markets, a policy group that previously opposed US Bitcoin spot ETFs.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50