The post US Banking Lobby Urges Delay on Crypto Bank Charter Approvals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. US banks asked the OCC to delay crypto-related bank The post US Banking Lobby Urges Delay on Crypto Bank Charter Approvals appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. US banks asked the OCC to delay crypto-related bank

US Banking Lobby Urges Delay on Crypto Bank Charter Approvals

  • US banks asked the OCC to delay crypto-related bank charters until digital asset regulations are clearly defined.
  • Crypto firms like Circle, Ripple, Coinbase, and Paxos seek charters that could give direct access to Federal Reserve systems.
  • Banks warned that conditional approvals tied to the GENIUS Act could create financial and operational risks.

Major US banking groups are pushing regulators to slow approvals for crypto-related bank charters. The American Bankers Association (ABA) asked the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to delay decisions on digital asset firms until clear regulatory rules are in place.

The request targets crypto companies seeking national trust bank charters that could give them direct access to the Federal Reserve system and regulated settlement services.

Banks argue that approving these applications before lawmakers finalize crypto rules could create financial system risks. 

Banks Push for Delay on Crypto Charters

The ABA submitted a comment letter to the OCC calling for stronger safety standards, more transparency, and a slower approval process for crypto-related charters. The request responds to the OCC’s proposed changes to national bank charter rules.

The group warned that many crypto firms applying for charters operate in areas where regulations are still unclear. Congress and federal agencies have not fully defined rules for stablecoins and digital asset activities.

The ABA said regulators and applicants must fully understand these responsibilities before approvals move forward.

The banking lobby specifically raised concerns about conditional charter approvals tied to the GENIUS Act, a major US stablecoin law still under development.

The law requires rulemaking from multiple agencies, including the US Treasury, Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and state regulators. Full implementation could take years.

Banks urged the OCC to avoid rushing decisions based on traditional timelines and instead wait until regulatory obligations are clearly defined.

Crypto Firms Seek Direct Access to Financial System

Several major crypto firms are pursuing or already hold conditional OCC trust bank charters. These include Circle, Ripple, BitGo, Paxos, Coinbase, and Nomura’s Laser Digital. Trump-linked World Liberty Financial recently applied for a charter tied to its USD1 stablecoin.

Related: Ray Dalio Explains the Complexity Surrounding the U.S. Economic Situation

These charters could allow crypto firms to operate under federal oversight and settle transactions directly without relying on traditional correspondent banking networks.

Banks warn that granting charters before regulatory frameworks are complete could allow crypto firms to access Federal Reserve infrastructure without clear operational requirements.

The ABA also raised concerns that some companies could use bank charters to avoid oversight from other regulators, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Massive Concerns

The ABA asked the OCC to confirm that it has strong receivership powers to handle insolvency risks if crypto charter holders fail. If a chartered institution without federal deposit insurance collapses, the OCC would be responsible for managing its resolution.

The group also raised concerns about capital requirements, cybersecurity standards, and operational risks. It said limited public information about some charter applicants makes it difficult to assess these risks.

Banks further called for stricter naming rules. They urged regulators to block non-bank trust companies from using the word “bank” unless they are part of a bank holding company

Related : Riskless Crypto Trades Now OK for Banks: What This Means for Ripple’s Banking Charter

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/us-banking-lobby-urges-delay-on-crypto-bank-charter-approvals/

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.03281
$0.03281$0.03281
+0.70%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
SEC Under Fire: Paul Atkins Faces Questions on Crypto Regulation Pause

SEC Under Fire: Paul Atkins Faces Questions on Crypto Regulation Pause

TLDR SEC Chair Paul Atkins is under scrutiny for pausing the case against Justin Sun. Democratic lawmakers question whether political ties influence the SEC’s enforcement
Share
Blockonomi2026/02/13 06:17
‘Judge the Code, Not the Coder’: AI Agent Slams Human Developer for Gatekeeping

‘Judge the Code, Not the Coder’: AI Agent Slams Human Developer for Gatekeeping

The post ‘Judge the Code, Not the Coder’: AI Agent Slams Human Developer for Gatekeeping appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief An AI agent’s performance
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/13 06:39