Law firm says vets have been harmed by “steering” practices leading homebuyers away from cheaper mortgages ST. LOUIS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#buyingahome–Veteran homebuyersLaw firm says vets have been harmed by “steering” practices leading homebuyers away from cheaper mortgages ST. LOUIS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#buyingahome–Veteran homebuyers

Hagens Berman: Lawsuit Accuses Veterans United Home Loans of Deceiving Military Homebuyers and Violating Real Estate Laws

2026/02/19 07:00
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Law firm says vets have been harmed by “steering” practices leading homebuyers away from cheaper mortgages

ST. LOUIS–(BUSINESS WIRE)–#buyingahome–Veteran homebuyers represented by attorneys at Hagens Berman filed a class-action lawsuit against Veterans United Home Loans, a private for-profit corporation unaffiliated with the military, accusing it of engaging in illegal predatory practices that harm vets seeking to buy a home.

The lawsuit was filed Feb. 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri against Veterans United Home Loans, owned by Mortgage Research Center, LLC, and Veterans Realty, owned by Realty Search Solutions, LLC. It accuses the parties of having capitalized on and exploited this market by deceptively suggesting it is part of the VA or the federal government, and steering clients to more costly, higher interest rate loans. Steering as a practice in real estate is an illegal practice.

If you bought a home and used Veterans United Home Loans to finance at any time since Jan. 1, 2020, find out more about your rights.

“Our lawsuit against Veterans United is two-fold,” said Steve W. Berman, managing partner and co-founder of Hagens Berman. “First, we believe Veterans United has engaged in blatantly illegal practices that have harmed homebuyers through predatory loan practices, and second, Veterans United has sought to deceive our nation’s military servicemembers by masquerading as affiliated with the U.S. Veterans Administration.”

The new lawsuit comes as part of consumer-protection law firm Hagens Berman’s efforts to create a more transparent real estate system, following on the heels of similar litigation aimed at Zillow Inc., at Rocket, and the firm’s blockbuster settlements regarding real estate brokerage fees totaling more than $1 billion.

Claims of Deception in Name & Practice

The lawsuit states that while the U.S. Veterans Administration runs an essential program for veterans and active military servicemembers looking to buy a house, Veterans United Home Loans and other defendants have no affiliation with the government and is founded and run by three individuals with no military service records.

According to the lawsuit, its website is intentionally designed to mislead home buyers into believing that it is part of the VA, based in part on its promotion that it is “The Nation’s #1 VA Lender,” and Veterans United’s trick has worked. The lawsuit details accounts from multiple real estate and loan officers who routinely lose business to Veterans United because veteran and military customers believe they need to use Veterans United because it is affiliated with the VA. Cited agents and loan officers in the complaint say, “Veterans United’s steering practices are a disservice to its clients in the military.”

“These mortgage companies should be ashamed of their underhanded business tactics and are wholly unaffiliated with the military,” Berman said. “No owner, co-owner or founder has served in the military.”

“Blatant Steering”

The lawsuit also brings claims of violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) for allegedly fraudulent conduct resulting in Veterans United customers being steered away from loans with better interest rates and cheaper overall outcomes for homebuyers.

Veterans United has a network of affiliated agents throughout the country who do not work for Veterans United, but who receive referrals from Veterans United, the lawsuit states. If the lead closes on a house, the agents pay Veterans United a substantial proportion (around 35%) of their commission, according to attorneys. These agents are also required to steer their clients into using Veterans United for their home loans even if the terms of the loans are less favorable than other loans available to consumers. If the agents do not do so, they stop receiving leads, the lawsuit alleges.

“Defendants’ conduct as alleged herein violates federal statutes that seek to promote transparency and accountability in the real estate industry, in two respects,” the lawsuit states. “First, Veterans United’s practice of providing leads to agents in exchange for pushing clients to Veterans United Home Loans is blatant steering. Second, by requiring preferred agents to pay the undisclosed 35% fee, Defendants are further violating RESPA because Defendants are receiving a payment that is not in exchange for completing the property transaction. RESPA prohibits receiving payments that are not ‘in connection with a transaction involving a federally related mortgage loan.’”

Veterans United offers less financial aid packages compared to its competitors and its loans have higher interest rates, threatening to trap veteran homebuyers into subpar financial agreements that could have been avoided at a competing lender.

Find out more about the lawsuit against Veterans United alleging illegal steering practices.

About Hagens Berman

Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs’ rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm’s determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of “Most Feared Plaintiff’s Firm,” MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.

Contacts

Media Contact
Ash Klann
pr@hbsslaw.com
206-623-9363

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why AVAX Traders Are Watching $11.50 and $8.00 Right Now

Why AVAX Traders Are Watching $11.50 and $8.00 Right Now

Avalanche gained 2.77% on March 4, reaching $9.64 by 15:50 UTC on volume of 327,810 AVAX, the highest single-hour reading on the chart. The move came after six
Share
Ethnews2026/03/05 00:16
Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27
USDsui debuts as Treasury yield is routed to Sui DeFi

USDsui debuts as Treasury yield is routed to Sui DeFi

USDsui stablecoin launches on Sui with reserves in bonds and liquid assets; yield from holdings is recycled to support SUI and DeFi pools via Bridge’s platform.
Share
CoinLive2026/03/04 23:57