There are three main factors that determine the profitability of Bitcoin mining: electricity cost, hardware efficiency, and the price of BTC. A few years ago, gettingThere are three main factors that determine the profitability of Bitcoin mining: electricity cost, hardware efficiency, and the price of BTC. A few years ago, getting

Bitcoin mining electricity cost in 2026

2026/02/19 03:00
8 min read

There are three main factors that determine the profitability of Bitcoin mining: electricity cost, hardware efficiency, and the price of BTC. A few years ago, getting a piece of digital gold was relatively easy and cheap, so the utility bill didn’t burn a hole in the pocket. But not anymore. 

Optimizing a Bitcoin mining operation to the electricity cost in 2026 is absolutely vital because getting rewarded now is harder than ever, so the price and the output per every kilowatt counts. For those who think of becoming crypto miners, we explain the connection between electricity demand and mining difficulty, how miner’s efficiency affects the cost, and suggest strategies to lower the power bill.     

How electricity fuels Bitcoin mining  

Without electricity, any digital currency would cease to exist. However, the Bitcoin network is especially dependent on electric power because it needs powerful computational devices called Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) miners to run around the clock to keep the blockchain secure and create new coins. They require a lot of power, and even more when trying to push them to the limit, like doing the Antminer S19 overclock, more on which you will find here.   

Bitcoin’s constant appetite for electricity is due to its main consensus and security mechanism called Proof-of-Work (PoW). Consensus means that the entire network, made up of thousands of computers working across the entire globe, agrees on which transactions to validate without a central “decision-maker,” such as a bank. This makes Bitcoin decentralized, which is one of its main selling points. To participate in the process, an ASIC must always remain online, consuming electricity.

While the device is running, and eating up kilowatts-hours, it’s solving difficult mathematical puzzles. This requires huge amounts of computational power to make literally trillions of calculations per second. Moreover, Bitcoin’s protocol intentionally makes these puzzles hard enough that solving them costs real money in electricity bills. This is called the mining difficulty, a super strong security barrier. 

Here is how this barrier works: every block added to the blockchain is basically real electricity, a currency of sorts, which miners “spend” to figure out a puzzle. Let’s say there’s a group that wants to cease control of the Bitcoin network through the notorious 51% attack. To achieve that on the blockchain, attackers would have to change all past transactions. This means they would have to recalculate every block and use the same amount of electricity again, but faster than the rest of the network combined. Given that Bitcoin now gobbles up around 195 TWh per year, the cost of attacking this network is “billions, and billions.”     

To sum it all up

  • Electricity consumption is a part of the “work” done when mining Bitcoin.
  • ASIC miners use vast amounts of energy to make computations to produce blocks and keep the network intact. 
  • Electricity cost for Bitcoin mining also acts as a defence mechanism, making potential attacks extremely costly.  

How much electricity does it cost to mine Bitcoin? 

We have come to the heart of the story: how much you’d have to pay for electricity to compete with other miners for that precious BTC. You have to realize that in 2026, it’s costlier than ever since the network difficulty is at an all-time high. It means that in order to earn the same amount of crypto as in, say, 2024, you’d have to run more ASICs, hence use more electricity, to make the total number of calculations required by the network. This directly affects the overall cost of mining.  

When it comes to the electricity consumption of ASIC miners, it’s more nuanced than a simple side-by-side comparison of characteristics. Here, a lot depends on the overall efficiency of the device and the cooling method. 

The efficiency is measured in Joules per Terahash (J/TH), which is the amount of electricity consumed by the device to achieve its hashing power (TH/s), which is the speed at which it solves the puzzles. The lower the J/TH, the more efficient an ASIC is. 

Then there are three cooling methods for ASIC miners: 

Air cooling is the most common one, which involves using fans and heatsinks to circulate air and dissipate heat.  

Liquid/hydro cooling uses a circulating liquid coolant (like water or a specialized fluid) that runs through water blocks or heat exchangers.

Immersion cooling means sinking the entire mining hardware into a non-conductive, dielectric cooling fluid (like mineral oil) inside a tank.

Let’s compare the stats for different models of the Antminer S series, so you could understand how much electricity a Bitcoin miner uses, and why power consumption rate alone doesn’t determine the ultimate mining profitability.  

Model Release YearHashrate (TH/s)Power Consumption (W)Efficiency (J/TH)
S19202095325034.2
S19 Pro2020110325029.55
S19j Pro 2021104306829.5
S19 XP2021 140301021.5
S19K Pro2023120-136326423
S212023200350017.5
S21 Pro2024234351015
S23 (Air) 2025318349811

As you can see, the electricity consumption rate didn’t change much over the years, contrary to hashrate and efficiency. Let’s compare these specs with those of hydro cooled models. 

Model Release YearHashrate (TH/s)Power Consumption (W)Efficiency (J/TH)
S19 XP Hyd2022257534620.8
S19 Pro Hyd2022184542829.5
S21 Hyd2024335536016
S21+ Hyd2025395592515
S23 Hyd 202558055109.5

Here, while the power consumption is higher than that in air cooled models, the hashrate and the efficiency are noticeably better. Now, let’s see what ASIC miners with immersion cooling have to offer before drawing conclusions. 

Model Release YearHashrate (TH/s)Power Consumption (W)Efficiency (J/TH)
S21 Immersion2024257556918.5
S21 XP Immersion2024184405013.5
S23 Immersion2025335530411

Let’s estimate the electricity costs in dollars and cents using the S23 model as an example since it’s a clear trade-off between efficiency and power consumption.  

  • The S23 Hyd is the top of the class in terms of efficiency and hashrate, achieving the sub-10 J/TH benchmark. For a fixed price, for example, $0.06/kWh, its daily electricity cost is highest at approximately $7.93, but it yields the highest mining output. 
  • The S23 (Air) has the lowest power draw and cost of around $5.04, making it the simplest and cheapest to run, though its lower efficiency and hashrate mean it’s the least profitable per W consumed. 
  • The S23 Immersion has roughly the same energy efficiency as the Air model, with an energy cost of approximately $7.64, but its value lies in its advanced cooling and high thermal stability, allowing for quiet, stable operation and overclocking. 

Knowing that, we can calculate an example where a farm of 10 liquid-cooled S23Hyd miners, running at a $0.06/kWh rate, would consume a total of 854,400 kWh of electricity, costing $51,264, required in 2026 to mine 1 Bitcoin in about 150 days. 

To sum it all up

  • High mining difficulty drives up the total cost of the operation, regardless of power efficiency. 
  • Energy efficiency (J/TH) is more important than raw power consumption. 
  • Cooling methods have a direct impact on efficiency and operational cost of Bitcoin mining.   

How to reduce electricity costs 

There are several strategies you can add to your playbook that can help bring the electricity cost down. 

Finding the cheapest electricity possible

Miners often move to locations with very low utility rates, or they partner with power producers to use surplus energy (like wasted natural gas or excess wind/solar power).

Doing off-peak mining 

Many electricity providers charge less during times of low demand, such as late at night. Miners can set their equipment to run most intensely during those discounted hours.

Managing the heat is essential 

Because miners produce a lot of heat, you spend more money on cooling. Using advanced systems like liquid cooling can efficiently remove heat, which reduces the need for expensive air conditioning.

Bottom line 

Mining Bitcoin in 2026 has become harder than ever because the network’s difficulty rate keeps rising, and electricity prices aren’t going down. Having new and efficient ASIC miners helps, but the main thing that decides whether a miner makes a profit is still the cost of electricity. In the end, cheap power is what decides the miner’s bottom line.

FAQ

How much electricity does it take to mine 1 Bitcoin? 

In 2026, it will take approximately 854,400 kWh of electricity to mine one Bitcoin globally.

Which ASIC miner is the most energy efficient? 

The Antminer S23 Hydro is currently the most energy-efficient model, offering around 9.5 J/TH thanks to its advanced hydro-cooling system.

How do I calculate my Bitcoin mining electricity cost? 

Multiply your ASIC’s power consumption (in kW) by the number of hours it runs per day and your local electricity rate (per kWh). 

The post Bitcoin mining electricity cost in 2026 appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$66,762.38
$66,762.38$66,762.38
+4.35%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10
Niagen Bioscience Secures New U.S. Patent Covering Intravenous and Injection Formulations and Methods of Use for Nicotinamide Riboside (NR), Niagen®

Niagen Bioscience Secures New U.S. Patent Covering Intravenous and Injection Formulations and Methods of Use for Nicotinamide Riboside (NR), Niagen®

Patent strengthens Niagen Bioscience’s intellectual property moat in fast-growing NAD+-boosting IV and injectable delivery formats, supporting commercial expansion
Share
AI Journal2026/02/25 21:36
ZachXBT admits possible leak as insider trading speculation peaks on prediction markets

ZachXBT admits possible leak as insider trading speculation peaks on prediction markets

The post ZachXBT admits possible leak as insider trading speculation peaks on prediction markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ZachXBT admits he may have
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/25 21:21