BitcoinWorld PulseChain Hack: Shocking $5 Million Loss Hits Better Bank DeFi The cryptocurrency world has been rocked by unsettling news: a significant PulseChain hack has targeted Better Bank, a prominent DeFi platform built on the PulseChain network. This alarming incident saw attackers drain approximately $5 million in assets, sending ripples of concern throughout the decentralized finance community and highlighting the critical need for robust security. What Exactly Happened in the PulseChain Hack? According to leading blockchain security firm CertiK, the PulseChain-based Better Bank suffered a substantial exploit, resulting in a staggering $5 million loss. This attack underscores the persistent security challenges faced by even innovative DeFi protocols, regardless of the underlying blockchain. The perpetrator acted swiftly following the breach. They moved to convert the stolen funds, successfully swapping the ill-gotten gains for 215 ETH. This Ethereum is currently valued at approximately $980,000, demonstrating the attacker’s rapid efforts to obfuscate the trail and realize their illicit profits. This quick conversion often makes recovery efforts incredibly challenging. How Did This DeFi Exploit Unfold on PulseChain? While the precise technical details of the Better Bank exploit are still under thorough investigation, such incidents typically stem from vulnerabilities within a protocol’s smart contract code. Common attack vectors include flash loan exploits, reentrancy bugs, or logic errors that allow an attacker to manipulate the system for their benefit. Attackers meticulously identify these weaknesses, often through extensive code analysis or by exploiting complex interactions between different DeFi protocols. Once a vulnerability is found, they execute a series of sophisticated transactions designed to drain funds before the protocol’s defenses or monitoring systems can effectively react. This particular PulseChain hack serves as a stark reminder that even innovative blockchain platforms like PulseChain require continuous, rigorous security assessments. DeFi’s open-source nature, while beneficial for transparency and community development, also means that potential vulnerabilities are visible to malicious actors. Therefore, robust auditing and constant vigilance are non-negotiable for platforms operating in this space. What Are the Broader Implications for PulseChain and DeFi Security? A hack of this magnitude naturally raises serious questions about the security posture of the entire PulseChain ecosystem and, by extension, the broader DeFi landscape. User trust is the bedrock of decentralized finance, and incidents like the Better Bank PulseChain hack can significantly erode that confidence, impacting adoption and investment. For the PulseChain community, this event underscores the critical need for enhanced security measures, proactive monitoring, and a rapid response framework. It challenges developers building on PulseChain to implement even more robust safeguards and encourages users to exercise extreme caution and due diligence when interacting with new or less-audited protocols. The implications extend beyond just the immediate financial loss: Ecosystem Reputation: Major exploits can damage the reputation of the underlying blockchain, making it harder to attract new projects and users. Investor Confidence: Both retail and institutional investors might become hesitant to engage with platforms or assets on the affected chain, fearing similar future incidents. Developer Scrutiny: Projects currently building or planning to launch on PulseChain may face increased scrutiny regarding their security audits and overall resilience. Regulatory Attention: Repeated hacks can draw unwanted attention from regulators, potentially leading to stricter oversight that could stifle innovation. Protecting Your Assets: Actionable Insights Against Future PulseChain Hacks In the wake of this Better Bank PulseChain hack, both users and developers must elevate security to their highest priority. Here are some actionable insights and best practices: For Users to Mitigate Risk: Thorough Due Diligence: Always research a DeFi project extensively before committing funds. Look for comprehensive audit reports from multiple reputable firms, transparent team information, and active community engagement. Diversify Your Portfolio: Avoid putting all your digital eggs into one basket. Spread your investments across various protocols and blockchains to minimize single-point-of-failure risk. Understand Inherent Risks: Acknowledge that DeFi, while offering high potential rewards, carries inherent risks, including smart contract vulnerabilities, impermanent loss, and potential rug pulls. Utilize Reputable Platforms: Prioritize interaction with protocols that have a long-standing track record, strong security practices, and a clear incident response history. Consider Cold Storage: For significant cryptocurrency holdings not actively used in DeFi, transfer them to hardware wallets (cold storage) for maximum security against online threats. Stay Informed: Follow reputable crypto security news outlets and blockchain analytics firms to stay updated on emerging threats and best practices. For Developers to Enhance Security: Mandatory Robust Audits: Conduct multiple, independent security audits by leading firms both before initial deployment and after any significant code updates or feature additions. Implement Bug Bounty Programs: Launching bug bounty programs incentivizes ethical (white-hat) hackers to discover and report vulnerabilities responsibly, preventing malicious exploits. Continuous Monitoring: Employ real-time monitoring tools and analytics to detect suspicious transaction patterns, unusual liquidity movements, or potential attack signatures. Develop an Emergency Response Plan: Have a clear, well-rehearsed plan in place for immediate action in case of an exploit, including communication strategies, pause functions, and recovery procedures. Formal Verification: Explore formal verification methods for critical smart contracts to mathematically prove their correctness and absence of bugs. The Better Bank PulseChain hack is a powerful, albeit unfortunate, reminder that vigilance and proactive security measures are absolutely critical in the fast-evolving world of decentralized finance. While innovation continues to drive the space forward with exciting possibilities, security must always remain at the forefront of both development efforts and user engagement. Learning from these incidents is crucial for building a more secure and resilient DeFi future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is Better Bank? Better Bank was a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform operating on the PulseChain blockchain, offering various financial services to its users. Q2: How much was lost in the Better Bank PulseChain hack? Approximately $5 million in digital assets were stolen during the Better Bank exploit. Q3: What happened to the stolen funds after the PulseChain hack? The attacker swiftly swapped the stolen assets for 215 ETH, which was valued at around $980,000 at the time of the report, likely to obscure the transaction trail. Q4: Who reported the Better Bank exploit? The blockchain security firm CertiK was among the first to report and confirm the details of the exploit. Q5: What can users do to protect themselves from similar DeFi hacks? Users should conduct thorough due diligence on DeFi projects, diversify their investments, understand the inherent risks, use reputable platforms, and consider cold storage for significant holdings. Q6: Does this hack affect the entire PulseChain network? While the hack directly targeted Better Bank, it raises broader questions about security practices within the PulseChain ecosystem and can impact overall user and investor confidence in the network. If you found this article insightful and believe it can help others navigate the complexities of crypto security, please consider sharing it on your social media platforms. Your support helps spread awareness and foster a more secure decentralized future! To learn more about the latest DeFi security trends, explore our article on key developments shaping the crypto market’s future resilience. This post PulseChain Hack: Shocking $5 Million Loss Hits Better Bank DeFi first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial TeamBitcoinWorld PulseChain Hack: Shocking $5 Million Loss Hits Better Bank DeFi The cryptocurrency world has been rocked by unsettling news: a significant PulseChain hack has targeted Better Bank, a prominent DeFi platform built on the PulseChain network. This alarming incident saw attackers drain approximately $5 million in assets, sending ripples of concern throughout the decentralized finance community and highlighting the critical need for robust security. What Exactly Happened in the PulseChain Hack? According to leading blockchain security firm CertiK, the PulseChain-based Better Bank suffered a substantial exploit, resulting in a staggering $5 million loss. This attack underscores the persistent security challenges faced by even innovative DeFi protocols, regardless of the underlying blockchain. The perpetrator acted swiftly following the breach. They moved to convert the stolen funds, successfully swapping the ill-gotten gains for 215 ETH. This Ethereum is currently valued at approximately $980,000, demonstrating the attacker’s rapid efforts to obfuscate the trail and realize their illicit profits. This quick conversion often makes recovery efforts incredibly challenging. How Did This DeFi Exploit Unfold on PulseChain? While the precise technical details of the Better Bank exploit are still under thorough investigation, such incidents typically stem from vulnerabilities within a protocol’s smart contract code. Common attack vectors include flash loan exploits, reentrancy bugs, or logic errors that allow an attacker to manipulate the system for their benefit. Attackers meticulously identify these weaknesses, often through extensive code analysis or by exploiting complex interactions between different DeFi protocols. Once a vulnerability is found, they execute a series of sophisticated transactions designed to drain funds before the protocol’s defenses or monitoring systems can effectively react. This particular PulseChain hack serves as a stark reminder that even innovative blockchain platforms like PulseChain require continuous, rigorous security assessments. DeFi’s open-source nature, while beneficial for transparency and community development, also means that potential vulnerabilities are visible to malicious actors. Therefore, robust auditing and constant vigilance are non-negotiable for platforms operating in this space. What Are the Broader Implications for PulseChain and DeFi Security? A hack of this magnitude naturally raises serious questions about the security posture of the entire PulseChain ecosystem and, by extension, the broader DeFi landscape. User trust is the bedrock of decentralized finance, and incidents like the Better Bank PulseChain hack can significantly erode that confidence, impacting adoption and investment. For the PulseChain community, this event underscores the critical need for enhanced security measures, proactive monitoring, and a rapid response framework. It challenges developers building on PulseChain to implement even more robust safeguards and encourages users to exercise extreme caution and due diligence when interacting with new or less-audited protocols. The implications extend beyond just the immediate financial loss: Ecosystem Reputation: Major exploits can damage the reputation of the underlying blockchain, making it harder to attract new projects and users. Investor Confidence: Both retail and institutional investors might become hesitant to engage with platforms or assets on the affected chain, fearing similar future incidents. Developer Scrutiny: Projects currently building or planning to launch on PulseChain may face increased scrutiny regarding their security audits and overall resilience. Regulatory Attention: Repeated hacks can draw unwanted attention from regulators, potentially leading to stricter oversight that could stifle innovation. Protecting Your Assets: Actionable Insights Against Future PulseChain Hacks In the wake of this Better Bank PulseChain hack, both users and developers must elevate security to their highest priority. Here are some actionable insights and best practices: For Users to Mitigate Risk: Thorough Due Diligence: Always research a DeFi project extensively before committing funds. Look for comprehensive audit reports from multiple reputable firms, transparent team information, and active community engagement. Diversify Your Portfolio: Avoid putting all your digital eggs into one basket. Spread your investments across various protocols and blockchains to minimize single-point-of-failure risk. Understand Inherent Risks: Acknowledge that DeFi, while offering high potential rewards, carries inherent risks, including smart contract vulnerabilities, impermanent loss, and potential rug pulls. Utilize Reputable Platforms: Prioritize interaction with protocols that have a long-standing track record, strong security practices, and a clear incident response history. Consider Cold Storage: For significant cryptocurrency holdings not actively used in DeFi, transfer them to hardware wallets (cold storage) for maximum security against online threats. Stay Informed: Follow reputable crypto security news outlets and blockchain analytics firms to stay updated on emerging threats and best practices. For Developers to Enhance Security: Mandatory Robust Audits: Conduct multiple, independent security audits by leading firms both before initial deployment and after any significant code updates or feature additions. Implement Bug Bounty Programs: Launching bug bounty programs incentivizes ethical (white-hat) hackers to discover and report vulnerabilities responsibly, preventing malicious exploits. Continuous Monitoring: Employ real-time monitoring tools and analytics to detect suspicious transaction patterns, unusual liquidity movements, or potential attack signatures. Develop an Emergency Response Plan: Have a clear, well-rehearsed plan in place for immediate action in case of an exploit, including communication strategies, pause functions, and recovery procedures. Formal Verification: Explore formal verification methods for critical smart contracts to mathematically prove their correctness and absence of bugs. The Better Bank PulseChain hack is a powerful, albeit unfortunate, reminder that vigilance and proactive security measures are absolutely critical in the fast-evolving world of decentralized finance. While innovation continues to drive the space forward with exciting possibilities, security must always remain at the forefront of both development efforts and user engagement. Learning from these incidents is crucial for building a more secure and resilient DeFi future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is Better Bank? Better Bank was a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform operating on the PulseChain blockchain, offering various financial services to its users. Q2: How much was lost in the Better Bank PulseChain hack? Approximately $5 million in digital assets were stolen during the Better Bank exploit. Q3: What happened to the stolen funds after the PulseChain hack? The attacker swiftly swapped the stolen assets for 215 ETH, which was valued at around $980,000 at the time of the report, likely to obscure the transaction trail. Q4: Who reported the Better Bank exploit? The blockchain security firm CertiK was among the first to report and confirm the details of the exploit. Q5: What can users do to protect themselves from similar DeFi hacks? Users should conduct thorough due diligence on DeFi projects, diversify their investments, understand the inherent risks, use reputable platforms, and consider cold storage for significant holdings. Q6: Does this hack affect the entire PulseChain network? While the hack directly targeted Better Bank, it raises broader questions about security practices within the PulseChain ecosystem and can impact overall user and investor confidence in the network. If you found this article insightful and believe it can help others navigate the complexities of crypto security, please consider sharing it on your social media platforms. Your support helps spread awareness and foster a more secure decentralized future! To learn more about the latest DeFi security trends, explore our article on key developments shaping the crypto market’s future resilience. This post PulseChain Hack: Shocking $5 Million Loss Hits Better Bank DeFi first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team

PulseChain Hack: Shocking $5 Million Loss Hits Better Bank DeFi

BitcoinWorld

PulseChain Hack: Shocking $5 Million Loss Hits Better Bank DeFi

The cryptocurrency world has been rocked by unsettling news: a significant PulseChain hack has targeted Better Bank, a prominent DeFi platform built on the PulseChain network. This alarming incident saw attackers drain approximately $5 million in assets, sending ripples of concern throughout the decentralized finance community and highlighting the critical need for robust security.

What Exactly Happened in the PulseChain Hack?

According to leading blockchain security firm CertiK, the PulseChain-based Better Bank suffered a substantial exploit, resulting in a staggering $5 million loss. This attack underscores the persistent security challenges faced by even innovative DeFi protocols, regardless of the underlying blockchain.

The perpetrator acted swiftly following the breach. They moved to convert the stolen funds, successfully swapping the ill-gotten gains for 215 ETH. This Ethereum is currently valued at approximately $980,000, demonstrating the attacker’s rapid efforts to obfuscate the trail and realize their illicit profits. This quick conversion often makes recovery efforts incredibly challenging.

How Did This DeFi Exploit Unfold on PulseChain?

While the precise technical details of the Better Bank exploit are still under thorough investigation, such incidents typically stem from vulnerabilities within a protocol’s smart contract code. Common attack vectors include flash loan exploits, reentrancy bugs, or logic errors that allow an attacker to manipulate the system for their benefit.

Attackers meticulously identify these weaknesses, often through extensive code analysis or by exploiting complex interactions between different DeFi protocols. Once a vulnerability is found, they execute a series of sophisticated transactions designed to drain funds before the protocol’s defenses or monitoring systems can effectively react. This particular PulseChain hack serves as a stark reminder that even innovative blockchain platforms like PulseChain require continuous, rigorous security assessments.

DeFi’s open-source nature, while beneficial for transparency and community development, also means that potential vulnerabilities are visible to malicious actors. Therefore, robust auditing and constant vigilance are non-negotiable for platforms operating in this space.

What Are the Broader Implications for PulseChain and DeFi Security?

A hack of this magnitude naturally raises serious questions about the security posture of the entire PulseChain ecosystem and, by extension, the broader DeFi landscape. User trust is the bedrock of decentralized finance, and incidents like the Better Bank PulseChain hack can significantly erode that confidence, impacting adoption and investment.

For the PulseChain community, this event underscores the critical need for enhanced security measures, proactive monitoring, and a rapid response framework. It challenges developers building on PulseChain to implement even more robust safeguards and encourages users to exercise extreme caution and due diligence when interacting with new or less-audited protocols.

The implications extend beyond just the immediate financial loss:

  • Ecosystem Reputation: Major exploits can damage the reputation of the underlying blockchain, making it harder to attract new projects and users.
  • Investor Confidence: Both retail and institutional investors might become hesitant to engage with platforms or assets on the affected chain, fearing similar future incidents.
  • Developer Scrutiny: Projects currently building or planning to launch on PulseChain may face increased scrutiny regarding their security audits and overall resilience.
  • Regulatory Attention: Repeated hacks can draw unwanted attention from regulators, potentially leading to stricter oversight that could stifle innovation.

Protecting Your Assets: Actionable Insights Against Future PulseChain Hacks

In the wake of this Better Bank PulseChain hack, both users and developers must elevate security to their highest priority. Here are some actionable insights and best practices:

  • For Users to Mitigate Risk:
    • Thorough Due Diligence: Always research a DeFi project extensively before committing funds. Look for comprehensive audit reports from multiple reputable firms, transparent team information, and active community engagement.
    • Diversify Your Portfolio: Avoid putting all your digital eggs into one basket. Spread your investments across various protocols and blockchains to minimize single-point-of-failure risk.
    • Understand Inherent Risks: Acknowledge that DeFi, while offering high potential rewards, carries inherent risks, including smart contract vulnerabilities, impermanent loss, and potential rug pulls.
    • Utilize Reputable Platforms: Prioritize interaction with protocols that have a long-standing track record, strong security practices, and a clear incident response history.
    • Consider Cold Storage: For significant cryptocurrency holdings not actively used in DeFi, transfer them to hardware wallets (cold storage) for maximum security against online threats.
    • Stay Informed: Follow reputable crypto security news outlets and blockchain analytics firms to stay updated on emerging threats and best practices.
  • For Developers to Enhance Security:
    • Mandatory Robust Audits: Conduct multiple, independent security audits by leading firms both before initial deployment and after any significant code updates or feature additions.
    • Implement Bug Bounty Programs: Launching bug bounty programs incentivizes ethical (white-hat) hackers to discover and report vulnerabilities responsibly, preventing malicious exploits.
    • Continuous Monitoring: Employ real-time monitoring tools and analytics to detect suspicious transaction patterns, unusual liquidity movements, or potential attack signatures.
    • Develop an Emergency Response Plan: Have a clear, well-rehearsed plan in place for immediate action in case of an exploit, including communication strategies, pause functions, and recovery procedures.
    • Formal Verification: Explore formal verification methods for critical smart contracts to mathematically prove their correctness and absence of bugs.

The Better Bank PulseChain hack is a powerful, albeit unfortunate, reminder that vigilance and proactive security measures are absolutely critical in the fast-evolving world of decentralized finance. While innovation continues to drive the space forward with exciting possibilities, security must always remain at the forefront of both development efforts and user engagement. Learning from these incidents is crucial for building a more secure and resilient DeFi future.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is Better Bank?

Better Bank was a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform operating on the PulseChain blockchain, offering various financial services to its users.

Q2: How much was lost in the Better Bank PulseChain hack?

Approximately $5 million in digital assets were stolen during the Better Bank exploit.

Q3: What happened to the stolen funds after the PulseChain hack?

The attacker swiftly swapped the stolen assets for 215 ETH, which was valued at around $980,000 at the time of the report, likely to obscure the transaction trail.

Q4: Who reported the Better Bank exploit?

The blockchain security firm CertiK was among the first to report and confirm the details of the exploit.

Q5: What can users do to protect themselves from similar DeFi hacks?

Users should conduct thorough due diligence on DeFi projects, diversify their investments, understand the inherent risks, use reputable platforms, and consider cold storage for significant holdings.

Q6: Does this hack affect the entire PulseChain network?

While the hack directly targeted Better Bank, it raises broader questions about security practices within the PulseChain ecosystem and can impact overall user and investor confidence in the network.

If you found this article insightful and believe it can help others navigate the complexities of crypto security, please consider sharing it on your social media platforms. Your support helps spread awareness and foster a more secure decentralized future!

To learn more about the latest DeFi security trends, explore our article on key developments shaping the crypto market’s future resilience.

This post PulseChain Hack: Shocking $5 Million Loss Hits Better Bank DeFi first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team

Market Opportunity
Whiterock Logo
Whiterock Price(WHITE)
$0.0001412
$0.0001412$0.0001412
+8.69%
USD
Whiterock (WHITE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures

CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures

The post CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group will offer options based on the derivative markets on Solana (SOL) and XRP. The new markets will open on October 13, after regulatory approval.  CME Group will expand its crypto products with options on the futures markets of Solana (SOL) and XRP. The futures market will start on October 13, after regulatory review and approval.  The options will allow the trading of MicroSol, XRP, and MicroXRP futures, with expiry dates available every business day, monthly, and quarterly. The new products will be added to the existing BTC and ETH options markets. ‘The launch of these options contracts builds on the significant growth and increasing liquidity we have seen across our suite of Solana and XRP futures,’ said Giovanni Vicioso, CME Group Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products. The options contracts will have two main sizes, tracking the futures contracts. The new market will be suitable for sophisticated institutional traders, as well as active individual traders. The addition of options markets singles out XRP and SOL as liquid enough to offer the potential to bet on a market direction.  The options on futures arrive a few months after the launch of SOL futures. Both SOL and XRP had peak volumes in August, though XRP activity has slowed down in September. XRP and SOL options to tap both institutions and active traders Crypto options are one of the indicators of market attitudes, with XRP and SOL receiving a new way to gauge sentiment. The contracts will be supported by the Cumberland team.  ‘As one of the biggest liquidity providers in the ecosystem, the Cumberland team is excited to support CME Group’s continued expansion of crypto offerings,’ said Roman Makarov, Head of Cumberland Options Trading at DRW. ‘The launch of options on Solana and XRP futures is the latest example of the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:56
XLM Price Prediction: Stellar Targets $0.26-$0.27 Range by February 2026

XLM Price Prediction: Stellar Targets $0.26-$0.27 Range by February 2026

The post XLM Price Prediction: Stellar Targets $0.26-$0.27 Range by February 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Zach Anderson Jan 14, 2026 13:31 XLM
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/15 10:06
Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token

Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token

The post Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Largest Bank in Spain Launches Crypto Service: Adoption Leads Traders to Snorter Token Sign Up for Our Newsletter! For updates and exclusive offers enter your email. Leah is a British journalist with a BA in Journalism, Media, and Communications and nearly a decade of content writing experience. Over the last four years, her focus has primarily been on Web3 technologies, driven by her genuine enthusiasm for decentralization and the latest technological advancements. She has contributed to leading crypto and NFT publications – Cointelegraph, Coinbound, Crypto News, NFT Plazas, Bitcolumnist, Techreport, and NFT Lately – which has elevated her to a senior role in crypto journalism. Whether crafting breaking news or in-depth reviews, she strives to engage her readers with the latest insights and information. Her articles often span the hottest cryptos, exchanges, and evolving regulations. As part of her ploy to attract crypto newbies into Web3, she explains even the most complex topics in an easily understandable and engaging way. Further underscoring her dynamic journalism background, she has written for various sectors, including software testing (TEST Magazine), travel (Travel Off Path), and music (Mixmag). When she’s not deep into a crypto rabbit hole, she’s probably island-hopping (with the Galapagos and Hainan being her go-to’s). Or perhaps sketching chalk pencil drawings while listening to the Pixies, her all-time favorite band. This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Center or Cookie Policy. I Agree Source: https://bitcoinist.com/banco-santander-and-snorter-token-crypto-services/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:45