TLDR: A 300bps rate drop could erase nearly $234B in annual MMF income. Even 5% MMF rotation may release $390B into higher-yield alternatives. STRC’s 11.25% yieldTLDR: A 300bps rate drop could erase nearly $234B in annual MMF income. Even 5% MMF rotation may release $390B into higher-yield alternatives. STRC’s 11.25% yield

Yield Tsunami Bitcoin: Fed Rate Cuts Could Trigger Massive Capital Rotation Into STRC

2026/02/23 05:25
3 min read

TLDR:

  • A 300bps rate drop could erase nearly $234B in annual MMF income.
  • Even 5% MMF rotation may release $390B into higher-yield alternatives.
  • STRC’s 11.25% yield positions it for institutional inflows during easing.
  • New STRC issuance could translate into large-scale Bitcoin purchases.

Yield Tsunami Bitcoin is gaining attention after investor Adam Livingston projected a sharp capital rotation toward Bitcoin-linked yield vehicles.

In a detailed post on X, Livingston argued that ongoing Federal Reserve rate cuts could erase hundreds of billions in annual income from U.S. money market funds.

He contends that falling short-term yields may push pensions, insurers, and endowments toward higher-yielding listed structures tied to Bitcoin exposure.

Rate Cuts and the Projected $234 Billion Income Compression

Livingston stated that U.S. money market funds hold roughly $7.79 trillion as of mid-February 2026. He noted that current yields near 4.5% to 5% reflect the prior hiking cycle.

However, he argued that an additional 75 to 100 basis points of cuts could reduce front-end rates toward 3% or lower.

According to his calculations, a 300-basis-point decline across $7.79 trillion equates to about $233.7 billion in lost annual income. He described this as a large-scale compression event for conservative capital pools. As yields fall, institutions dependent on fixed income cash flows may reallocate capital.

In his tweet, Livingston called this shift a “trillion-dollar yield tsunami” moving toward Bitcoin-aligned assets. He referenced historical data from the post-2008 and 2020 easing cycles. During those periods, alternative credit and private structures experienced accelerated asset growth.

He further cited estimates suggesting that even a 5% rotation from money market funds could release nearly $390 billion. A portion of that capital, he argued, may seek liquid high-yield instruments offering double-digit returns.

STRC Structure and the Bitcoin Treasury Feedback Loop

Livingston identified Strategy’s Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock, trading under STRC, as a potential beneficiary.

The security reportedly pays 11.25% annualized, distributed monthly. It trades near $100 par value and includes a rules-based monthly reset feature.

He reported that STRC has a notional value of about $3.46 billion with average daily trading volume near $128 million.

According to the post, dividend coverage is supported by cash reserves and the strategy’s Bitcoin treasury. The company currently holds more than 717,000 BTC.

Livingston estimated that a 0.5% capture of projected alternative inflows could generate $2 to $4 billion in new STRC issuance.

At Bitcoin prices near $68,000, he calculated that each $1 billion raised could acquire roughly 14,700 BTC. Larger inflows would increase that figure proportionally.

He also modeled broader scenarios. A 5% rotation from money market funds with a 10% STRC capture rate could imply $39 billion in inflows.

That level, based on his figures, would represent hundreds of thousands of additional BTC purchases. Yield Tsunami Bitcoin remains central to his thesis that rate compression may indirectly expand institutional Bitcoin exposure through listed yield vehicles.

The post Yield Tsunami Bitcoin: Fed Rate Cuts Could Trigger Massive Capital Rotation Into STRC appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump's latest 'particularly creepy' move alarms psychologist: 'Aggrandizing himself'

Trump's latest 'particularly creepy' move alarms psychologist: 'Aggrandizing himself'

President Donald Trump's latest "particularly creepy" move alarmed a psychologist over the weekend. Dr. John Gartner, a psychologist and psychotherapist, discussed
Share
Rawstory2026/02/23 11:26
Rwanda Mineral Exports Surge 46% as Trade Deficit Narrows in 2025

Rwanda Mineral Exports Surge 46% as Trade Deficit Narrows in 2025

Rwanda’s mineral exports delivered a powerful performance in 2025, with shipments of tin, tungsten and tantalum rising by 46.2 percent year on year. The expansion
Share
Furtherafrica2026/02/23 11:00
ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

The post ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jimmy Kimmel (Photo by Media Access Awards Presented By Easterseals/Getty Images for Easterseals) Getty Images for Easterseals The shock decision by ABC to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! “indefinitely” after the late-night host’s remarks about the killing of Charlie Kirk has created a rare moment in modern TV media: A major show abruptly taken off the air, with its network forced into crisis-management mode. Rare, that is, but not unprecedented. What might go unnoticed by many people reacting to the news about Kimmel and his potential cancellation is that this is not the first time ABC has made such a move. In fact, a version of the same thing happened to Kimmel’s predecessor program — Bill Maher’s Politically Incorrect, which once had Kimmel’s slot and which ABC cancelled in the wake of a firestorm around comments Maher made in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. (Notice, by the way, that I said cancelled “in the wake of” and not “because of.” More on that in a moment.) Here’s what happened: Less than a week after 9/11, Maher and a panel were talking about then-President George W. Bush’s use of the word “cowards” to describe the hijackers. “We have been the cowards,” Maher interjected, referencing the practice of “lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That’s cowardly.” But Maher then went even farther over the line: Actually staying in an airplane as it hits a building? “Not cowardly.” You can read more about the ensuing uproar in this ABC news story from 2001, which includes a statement that Maher issued through his publicist: “In no way was I intending to say, nor have I ever thought, that the men and women who defend our nation in uniform are anything but courageous and valiant, and I offer my apologies to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:02