The post Ansgar Dietrichs: zkEVM could be Ethereum’s biggest transformation, enhancing scaling by optimizing verification, and the shift to mandatory zk proofs The post Ansgar Dietrichs: zkEVM could be Ethereum’s biggest transformation, enhancing scaling by optimizing verification, and the shift to mandatory zk proofs

Ansgar Dietrichs: zkEVM could be Ethereum’s biggest transformation, enhancing scaling by optimizing verification, and the shift to mandatory zk proofs will boost network efficiency



Zero-knowledge proofs could revolutionize Ethereum’s efficiency and scalability in the upcoming zkEVM era

Key takeaways

  • zkEVM technology reduces computational effort by allowing nodes to verify blocks without re-executing them.
  • An upcoming Ethereum fork is on the horizon, though not imminent.
  • The zkEVM era could be Ethereum’s most impactful era due to its scaling benefits.
  • zkEVM addresses blockchain scaling issues by optimizing verification processes.
  • Transitioning to synchronous verification could lead to significant performance improvements.
  • Galaxy is a leading platform offering diverse financial products in the digital asset space.
  • Emerging markets may offer higher yields than traditional DeFi.
  • Bitcoin’s decentralized verification leads to computational redundancy across blockchains.
  • Zero-knowledge proofs could reduce redundant computations in blockchain systems.
  • Cryptographic proofs streamline blockchain transaction verification, enhancing efficiency.
  • Modern zero-knowledge systems simplify cryptographic proof creation using instruction set architecture.
  • Ethereum’s layer one aims to achieve zk rollup performance with zkEVM.
  • Ethereum’s design prioritizes verifiability and auditability, impacting its performance.
  • Ethereum validators follow community-set rules, emphasizing decentralized governance.
  • Ethereum’s scaling strategy includes both traditional methods and zkVM technology.

Guest intro

Ansgar Dietrichs is a Researcher at the Ethereum Foundation leading the Scale track, which consolidates efforts to improve Ethereum’s base-layer execution capacity, networking, and consensus mechanisms. He co-leads the zkEVM attester client initiative, which aims to replace the current model of re-executing every block with zero-knowledge proof verification to significantly reduce computational overhead. Dietrichs has been instrumental in directing benchmarking and engineering interventions to identify and resolve compute-heavy bottlenecks across Ethereum’s protocol.

The potential of zkEVM for Ethereum

  • “The zkEVM allows nodes to verify blocks without re-executing them, significantly reducing computational effort.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • zkEVM technology enhances blockchain efficiency by optimizing compute verification.
  • “The zkEVM era has the potential to be Ethereum’s best era due to its significant impact on scaling.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • zkEVM arose from the need to address scaling issues in blockchain technology.
  • zkEVM enables significant scaling improvements for Ethereum by optimizing compute verification.
  • “zkEVM might represent the biggest change ever for Ethereum.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • zkEVM improves Ethereum’s efficiency by reducing the need for disk I/O during transaction execution.
  • With zkVM, validators can confirm block validity before applying state updates, enhancing transaction throughput.
  • Partial statelessness allows Ethereum nodes to operate efficiently by maintaining only relevant state subsets.
  • zk proofs allow block verification without downloading the entire block, optimizing bandwidth usage.
  • The integration of zkEVM with Ethereum enhances scalability by addressing bandwidth, I/O, and compute constraints.
  • Ethereum’s layer one will achieve zk rollup performance once zkEVM is fully operational.

The future of Ethereum’s scaling strategy

  • Another Ethereum fork is on the horizon, though not imminent.
  • “The transition from asynchronous to synchronous verification will lead to significant performance improvements in blockchain operations.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • Emerging markets are expected to generate substantial yields, potentially exceeding traditional DeFi.
  • Ethereum aims for a threefold increase in throughput each year.
  • Ethereum is pursuing both traditional scaling methods and zkVM technology in parallel.
  • zkEVM enhances throughput but introduces minor latency due to an additional proving step.
  • Ethereum’s finality time is expected to decrease significantly, potentially down to single slot finality.
  • Ethereum’s block times and transaction assurances are expected to improve significantly soon.
  • Ethereum will transition from optional to mandatory zk proofs, enhancing network efficiency.
  • Within the next twelve months, Ethereum will begin rolling out zk proofs in an early production-ready state.
  • The transition to zk nodes will require technical improvements, including block and blob integration.
  • The transition to a new format for the Ethereum state tree is crucial for mandatory proofs.

The role of cryptographic proofs in blockchain efficiency

  • Cryptographic proofs allow for blockchain transaction verification without re-execution, streamlining the process.
  • Technological progress in cryptographic hashes is necessary for blockchain systems’ evolution.
  • The evolution from handcrafted algorithms to general-purpose cryptography represents a significant advancement.
  • Modern zero-knowledge systems are built using an instruction set architecture, simplifying cryptographic proof creation.
  • Ethereum clients can now be compiled to RISC-V, allowing for efficient zero-knowledge proofs.
  • “We are starting to achieve the target zone for proving full Ethereum blocks within five seconds.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • The last year has been pivotal for performance improvements in real-time proving.
  • zk proofs optimize bandwidth usage by allowing block verification without downloading the entire block.
  • zk proofs will become mandatory, significantly enhancing Ethereum’s network efficiency.
  • “Formal verification in blockchain technology will become increasingly important, especially with the rise of AI.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • The transition to mandatory proofs may take longer than planned if necessary.
  • The restructuring of internal expertise is crucial for adapting to new operations with zero-knowledge proofs.

The impact of zkEVM on Ethereum’s architecture

  • zkEVM enables significant scaling improvements for Ethereum by optimizing compute verification.
  • zkEVM might represent the biggest change ever for Ethereum.
  • zkVM improves Ethereum’s efficiency by reducing the need for disk I/O during transaction execution.
  • With zkVM, validators can confirm block validity before applying state updates, enhancing transaction throughput.
  • Partial statelessness allows Ethereum nodes to operate efficiently by maintaining only relevant state subsets.
  • zk proofs allow block verification without downloading the entire block, optimizing bandwidth usage.
  • The integration of zkEVM with Ethereum enhances scalability by addressing bandwidth, I/O, and compute constraints.
  • Ethereum’s layer one will achieve zk rollup performance once zkEVM is fully operational.
  • Ethereum’s design prioritizes verifiability and auditability, impacting its performance.
  • Ethereum validators follow community-set rules, emphasizing decentralized governance.
  • In Ethereum, validators cannot unilaterally change chain rules; the community dictates them.
  • Ethereum’s approach to scaling is shifting towards immediate solutions rather than waiting for long-term developments like zkVM.

The significance of zkEVM in Ethereum’s evolution

  • zkEVM technology reduces computational effort by allowing nodes to verify blocks without re-executing them.
  • “The zkEVM era has the potential to be Ethereum’s best era due to its significant impact on scaling.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • zkEVM arose from the need to address scaling issues in blockchain technology.
  • zkEVM enables significant scaling improvements for Ethereum by optimizing compute verification.
  • zkEVM might represent the biggest change ever for Ethereum.
  • zkVM improves Ethereum’s efficiency by reducing the need for disk I/O during transaction execution.
  • With zkVM, validators can confirm block validity before applying state updates, enhancing transaction throughput.
  • Partial statelessness allows Ethereum nodes to operate efficiently by maintaining only relevant state subsets.
  • zk proofs allow block verification without downloading the entire block, optimizing bandwidth usage.
  • The integration of zkEVM with Ethereum enhances scalability by addressing bandwidth, I/O, and compute constraints.
  • Ethereum’s layer one will achieve zk rollup performance once zkEVM is fully operational.
  • Ethereum’s design prioritizes verifiability and auditability, impacting its performance.

The challenges and opportunities in Ethereum’s scaling journey

  • Another Ethereum fork is on the horizon, though not imminent.
  • The transition from asynchronous to synchronous verification could lead to significant performance improvements.
  • Emerging markets are expected to generate substantial yields, potentially exceeding traditional DeFi.
  • Ethereum aims for a threefold increase in throughput each year.
  • Ethereum is pursuing both traditional scaling methods and zkVM technology in parallel.
  • zkEVM enhances throughput but introduces minor latency due to an additional proving step.
  • Ethereum’s finality time is expected to decrease significantly, potentially down to single slot finality.
  • Ethereum’s block times and transaction assurances are expected to improve significantly soon.
  • Ethereum will transition from optional to mandatory zk proofs, enhancing network efficiency.
  • Within the next twelve months, Ethereum will begin rolling out zk proofs in an early production-ready state.
  • The transition to zk nodes will require technical improvements, including block and blob integration.
  • The transition to a new format for the Ethereum state tree is crucial for mandatory proofs.

The future of Ethereum’s architecture with zkEVM

  • zkEVM enables significant scaling improvements for Ethereum by optimizing compute verification.
  • zkEVM might represent the biggest change ever for Ethereum.
  • zkVM improves Ethereum’s efficiency by reducing the need for disk I/O during transaction execution.
  • With zkVM, validators can confirm block validity before applying state updates, enhancing transaction throughput.
  • Partial statelessness allows Ethereum nodes to operate efficiently by maintaining only relevant state subsets.
  • zk proofs allow block verification without downloading the entire block, optimizing bandwidth usage.
  • The integration of zkEVM with Ethereum enhances scalability by addressing bandwidth, I/O, and compute constraints.
  • Ethereum’s layer one will achieve zk rollup performance once zkEVM is fully operational.
  • Ethereum’s design prioritizes verifiability and auditability, impacting its performance.
  • Ethereum validators follow community-set rules, emphasizing decentralized governance.
  • In Ethereum, validators cannot unilaterally change chain rules; the community dictates them.
  • Ethereum’s approach to scaling is shifting towards immediate solutions rather than waiting for long-term developments like zkVM.

The transformative potential of zkEVM in blockchain technology

  • zkEVM technology reduces computational effort by allowing nodes to verify blocks without re-executing them.
  • “The zkEVM era has the potential to be Ethereum’s best era due to its significant impact on scaling.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • zkEVM arose from the need to address scaling issues in blockchain technology.
  • zkEVM enables significant scaling improvements for Ethereum by optimizing compute verification.
  • zkEVM might represent the biggest change ever for Ethereum.
  • zkVM improves Ethereum’s efficiency by reducing the need for disk I/O during transaction execution.
  • With zkVM, validators can confirm block validity before applying state updates, enhancing transaction throughput.
  • Partial statelessness allows Ethereum nodes to operate efficiently by maintaining only relevant state subsets.
  • zk proofs allow block verification without downloading the entire block, optimizing bandwidth usage.
  • The integration of zkEVM with Ethereum enhances scalability by addressing bandwidth, I/O, and compute constraints.
  • Ethereum’s layer one will achieve zk rollup performance once zkEVM is fully operational.
  • Ethereum’s design prioritizes verifiability and auditability, impacting its performance.

Zero-knowledge proofs could revolutionize Ethereum’s efficiency and scalability in the upcoming zkEVM era

Key takeaways

  • zkEVM technology reduces computational effort by allowing nodes to verify blocks without re-executing them.
  • An upcoming Ethereum fork is on the horizon, though not imminent.
  • The zkEVM era could be Ethereum’s most impactful era due to its scaling benefits.
  • zkEVM addresses blockchain scaling issues by optimizing verification processes.
  • Transitioning to synchronous verification could lead to significant performance improvements.
  • Galaxy is a leading platform offering diverse financial products in the digital asset space.
  • Emerging markets may offer higher yields than traditional DeFi.
  • Bitcoin’s decentralized verification leads to computational redundancy across blockchains.
  • Zero-knowledge proofs could reduce redundant computations in blockchain systems.
  • Cryptographic proofs streamline blockchain transaction verification, enhancing efficiency.
  • Modern zero-knowledge systems simplify cryptographic proof creation using instruction set architecture.
  • Ethereum’s layer one aims to achieve zk rollup performance with zkEVM.
  • Ethereum’s design prioritizes verifiability and auditability, impacting its performance.
  • Ethereum validators follow community-set rules, emphasizing decentralized governance.
  • Ethereum’s scaling strategy includes both traditional methods and zkVM technology.

Guest intro

Ansgar Dietrichs is a Researcher at the Ethereum Foundation leading the Scale track, which consolidates efforts to improve Ethereum’s base-layer execution capacity, networking, and consensus mechanisms. He co-leads the zkEVM attester client initiative, which aims to replace the current model of re-executing every block with zero-knowledge proof verification to significantly reduce computational overhead. Dietrichs has been instrumental in directing benchmarking and engineering interventions to identify and resolve compute-heavy bottlenecks across Ethereum’s protocol.

The potential of zkEVM for Ethereum

  • “The zkEVM allows nodes to verify blocks without re-executing them, significantly reducing computational effort.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • zkEVM technology enhances blockchain efficiency by optimizing compute verification.
  • “The zkEVM era has the potential to be Ethereum’s best era due to its significant impact on scaling.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • zkEVM arose from the need to address scaling issues in blockchain technology.
  • zkEVM enables significant scaling improvements for Ethereum by optimizing compute verification.
  • “zkEVM might represent the biggest change ever for Ethereum.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • zkEVM improves Ethereum’s efficiency by reducing the need for disk I/O during transaction execution.
  • With zkVM, validators can confirm block validity before applying state updates, enhancing transaction throughput.
  • Partial statelessness allows Ethereum nodes to operate efficiently by maintaining only relevant state subsets.
  • zk proofs allow block verification without downloading the entire block, optimizing bandwidth usage.
  • The integration of zkEVM with Ethereum enhances scalability by addressing bandwidth, I/O, and compute constraints.
  • Ethereum’s layer one will achieve zk rollup performance once zkEVM is fully operational.

The future of Ethereum’s scaling strategy

  • Another Ethereum fork is on the horizon, though not imminent.
  • “The transition from asynchronous to synchronous verification will lead to significant performance improvements in blockchain operations.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • Emerging markets are expected to generate substantial yields, potentially exceeding traditional DeFi.
  • Ethereum aims for a threefold increase in throughput each year.
  • Ethereum is pursuing both traditional scaling methods and zkVM technology in parallel.
  • zkEVM enhances throughput but introduces minor latency due to an additional proving step.
  • Ethereum’s finality time is expected to decrease significantly, potentially down to single slot finality.
  • Ethereum’s block times and transaction assurances are expected to improve significantly soon.
  • Ethereum will transition from optional to mandatory zk proofs, enhancing network efficiency.
  • Within the next twelve months, Ethereum will begin rolling out zk proofs in an early production-ready state.
  • The transition to zk nodes will require technical improvements, including block and blob integration.
  • The transition to a new format for the Ethereum state tree is crucial for mandatory proofs.

The role of cryptographic proofs in blockchain efficiency

  • Cryptographic proofs allow for blockchain transaction verification without re-execution, streamlining the process.
  • Technological progress in cryptographic hashes is necessary for blockchain systems’ evolution.
  • The evolution from handcrafted algorithms to general-purpose cryptography represents a significant advancement.
  • Modern zero-knowledge systems are built using an instruction set architecture, simplifying cryptographic proof creation.
  • Ethereum clients can now be compiled to RISC-V, allowing for efficient zero-knowledge proofs.
  • “We are starting to achieve the target zone for proving full Ethereum blocks within five seconds.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • The last year has been pivotal for performance improvements in real-time proving.
  • zk proofs optimize bandwidth usage by allowing block verification without downloading the entire block.
  • zk proofs will become mandatory, significantly enhancing Ethereum’s network efficiency.
  • “Formal verification in blockchain technology will become increasingly important, especially with the rise of AI.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • The transition to mandatory proofs may take longer than planned if necessary.
  • The restructuring of internal expertise is crucial for adapting to new operations with zero-knowledge proofs.

The impact of zkEVM on Ethereum’s architecture

  • zkEVM enables significant scaling improvements for Ethereum by optimizing compute verification.
  • zkEVM might represent the biggest change ever for Ethereum.
  • zkVM improves Ethereum’s efficiency by reducing the need for disk I/O during transaction execution.
  • With zkVM, validators can confirm block validity before applying state updates, enhancing transaction throughput.
  • Partial statelessness allows Ethereum nodes to operate efficiently by maintaining only relevant state subsets.
  • zk proofs allow block verification without downloading the entire block, optimizing bandwidth usage.
  • The integration of zkEVM with Ethereum enhances scalability by addressing bandwidth, I/O, and compute constraints.
  • Ethereum’s layer one will achieve zk rollup performance once zkEVM is fully operational.
  • Ethereum’s design prioritizes verifiability and auditability, impacting its performance.
  • Ethereum validators follow community-set rules, emphasizing decentralized governance.
  • In Ethereum, validators cannot unilaterally change chain rules; the community dictates them.
  • Ethereum’s approach to scaling is shifting towards immediate solutions rather than waiting for long-term developments like zkVM.

The significance of zkEVM in Ethereum’s evolution

  • zkEVM technology reduces computational effort by allowing nodes to verify blocks without re-executing them.
  • “The zkEVM era has the potential to be Ethereum’s best era due to its significant impact on scaling.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • zkEVM arose from the need to address scaling issues in blockchain technology.
  • zkEVM enables significant scaling improvements for Ethereum by optimizing compute verification.
  • zkEVM might represent the biggest change ever for Ethereum.
  • zkVM improves Ethereum’s efficiency by reducing the need for disk I/O during transaction execution.
  • With zkVM, validators can confirm block validity before applying state updates, enhancing transaction throughput.
  • Partial statelessness allows Ethereum nodes to operate efficiently by maintaining only relevant state subsets.
  • zk proofs allow block verification without downloading the entire block, optimizing bandwidth usage.
  • The integration of zkEVM with Ethereum enhances scalability by addressing bandwidth, I/O, and compute constraints.
  • Ethereum’s layer one will achieve zk rollup performance once zkEVM is fully operational.
  • Ethereum’s design prioritizes verifiability and auditability, impacting its performance.

The challenges and opportunities in Ethereum’s scaling journey

  • Another Ethereum fork is on the horizon, though not imminent.
  • The transition from asynchronous to synchronous verification could lead to significant performance improvements.
  • Emerging markets are expected to generate substantial yields, potentially exceeding traditional DeFi.
  • Ethereum aims for a threefold increase in throughput each year.
  • Ethereum is pursuing both traditional scaling methods and zkVM technology in parallel.
  • zkEVM enhances throughput but introduces minor latency due to an additional proving step.
  • Ethereum’s finality time is expected to decrease significantly, potentially down to single slot finality.
  • Ethereum’s block times and transaction assurances are expected to improve significantly soon.
  • Ethereum will transition from optional to mandatory zk proofs, enhancing network efficiency.
  • Within the next twelve months, Ethereum will begin rolling out zk proofs in an early production-ready state.
  • The transition to zk nodes will require technical improvements, including block and blob integration.
  • The transition to a new format for the Ethereum state tree is crucial for mandatory proofs.

The future of Ethereum’s architecture with zkEVM

  • zkEVM enables significant scaling improvements for Ethereum by optimizing compute verification.
  • zkEVM might represent the biggest change ever for Ethereum.
  • zkVM improves Ethereum’s efficiency by reducing the need for disk I/O during transaction execution.
  • With zkVM, validators can confirm block validity before applying state updates, enhancing transaction throughput.
  • Partial statelessness allows Ethereum nodes to operate efficiently by maintaining only relevant state subsets.
  • zk proofs allow block verification without downloading the entire block, optimizing bandwidth usage.
  • The integration of zkEVM with Ethereum enhances scalability by addressing bandwidth, I/O, and compute constraints.
  • Ethereum’s layer one will achieve zk rollup performance once zkEVM is fully operational.
  • Ethereum’s design prioritizes verifiability and auditability, impacting its performance.
  • Ethereum validators follow community-set rules, emphasizing decentralized governance.
  • In Ethereum, validators cannot unilaterally change chain rules; the community dictates them.
  • Ethereum’s approach to scaling is shifting towards immediate solutions rather than waiting for long-term developments like zkVM.

The transformative potential of zkEVM in blockchain technology

  • zkEVM technology reduces computational effort by allowing nodes to verify blocks without re-executing them.
  • “The zkEVM era has the potential to be Ethereum’s best era due to its significant impact on scaling.” – Ansgar Dietrichs
  • zkEVM arose from the need to address scaling issues in blockchain technology.
  • zkEVM enables significant scaling improvements for Ethereum by optimizing compute verification.
  • zkEVM might represent the biggest change ever for Ethereum.
  • zkVM improves Ethereum’s efficiency by reducing the need for disk I/O during transaction execution.
  • With zkVM, validators can confirm block validity before applying state updates, enhancing transaction throughput.
  • Partial statelessness allows Ethereum nodes to operate efficiently by maintaining only relevant state subsets.
  • zk proofs allow block verification without downloading the entire block, optimizing bandwidth usage.
  • The integration of zkEVM with Ethereum enhances scalability by addressing bandwidth, I/O, and compute constraints.
  • Ethereum’s layer one will achieve zk rollup performance once zkEVM is fully operational.
  • Ethereum’s design prioritizes verifiability and auditability, impacting its performance.

Loading more articles…

You’ve reached the end


Add us on Google

`;
}

function createMobileArticle(article) {
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const authorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `


${captionHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${createSocialShare()}

${authorHtml}
${displayDate}

${article.content}

`;
}

function createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml) {
const editorSlug = article.editor ? article.editor.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, ‘-‘) : ”;
const displayDate = getDisplayDate(article);
const captionHtml = article.imageCaption ? `

${article.imageCaption}

` : ”;
const categoriesHtml = article.categories.map((cat, i) => {
const separator = i < article.categories.length – 1 ? ‘|‘ : ”;
return `${cat}${separator}`;
}).join(”);
const desktopAuthorHtml = article.isPressRelease ? ” : `
`;

return `

${categoriesHtml}

${article.subheadline ? `

${article.subheadline}

` : ”}

${desktopAuthorHtml}
${displayDate}
${createSocialShare()}

${captionHtml}

`;
}

function loadMoreArticles() {
if (isLoading || !hasMore) return;

isLoading = true;
loadingText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);

// Build form data for AJAX request
const formData = new FormData();
formData.append(‘action’, ‘cb_lovable_load_more’);
formData.append(‘current_post_id’, lastLoadedPostId);
formData.append(‘primary_cat_id’, primaryCatId);
formData.append(‘before_date’, lastLoadedDate);
formData.append(‘loaded_ids’, loadedPostIds.join(‘,’));

fetch(ajaxUrl, {
method: ‘POST’,
body: formData
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);

if (data.success && data.has_more && data.article) {
const article = data.article;
const sidebarAdHtml = data.sidebar_ad_html || ”;

// Check for duplicates
if (loadedPostIds.includes(article.id)) {
console.log(‘Duplicate article detected, skipping:’, article.id);
// Update pagination vars and try again
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;
loadMoreArticles();
return;
}

// Add to mobile container
mobileContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createMobileArticle(article));

// Add to desktop container with fresh ad HTML
desktopContainer.insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’, createDesktopArticle(article, sidebarAdHtml));

// Update tracking variables
loadedPostIds.push(article.id);
lastLoadedPostId = article.id;
lastLoadedDate = article.publishDate;

// Execute any inline scripts in the new content (for ads)
const newArticle = desktopContainer.querySelector(`article[data-article-id=”${article.id}”]`);
if (newArticle) {
const scripts = newArticle.querySelectorAll(‘script’);
scripts.forEach(script => {
const newScript = document.createElement(‘script’);
if (script.src) {
newScript.src = script.src;
} else {
newScript.textContent = script.textContent;
}
document.body.appendChild(newScript);
});
}

// Trigger Ad Inserter if available
if (typeof ai_check_and_insert_block === ‘function’) {
ai_check_and_insert_block();
}

// Trigger Google Publisher Tag refresh if available
if (typeof googletag !== ‘undefined’ && googletag.pubads) {
googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.pubads().refresh();
});
}

} else if (data.success && !data.has_more) {
hasMore = false;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
} else if (!data.success) {
console.error(‘AJAX error:’, data.error);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
}
})
.catch(error => {
console.error(‘Fetch error:’, error);
isLoading = false;
loadingText.classList.add(‘hidden’);
hasMore = false;
endText.textContent=”Error loading more articles”;
endText.classList.remove(‘hidden’);
});
}

// Set up IntersectionObserver
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(function(entries) {
if (entries[0].isIntersecting) {
loadMoreArticles();
}
}, { threshold: 0.1 });

observer.observe(loadingTrigger);
})();

© Decentral Media and Crypto Briefing® 2026.

Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/ansgar-dietrichs-zkevm-could-be-ethereums-biggest-transformation-enhancing-scaling-by-optimizing-verification-and-the-shift-to-mandatory-zk-proofs-will-boost-network-efficiency-bankless/

Market Opportunity
ZKsync Logo
ZKsync Price(ZK)
$0.0196
$0.0196$0.0196
-0.91%
USD
ZKsync (ZK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crypto News: Donald Trump-Aligned Fed Governor To Speed Up Fed Rate Cuts?

Crypto News: Donald Trump-Aligned Fed Governor To Speed Up Fed Rate Cuts?

The post Crypto News: Donald Trump-Aligned Fed Governor To Speed Up Fed Rate Cuts? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In recent crypto news, Stephen Miran swore in as the latest Federal Reserve governor on September 16, 2025, slipping into the board’s last open spot right before the Federal Open Market Committee kicks off its two-day rate discussion. Traders are betting heavily on a 25-basis-point trim, which would bring the federal funds rate down to 4.00%-4.25%, based on CME FedWatch Tool figures from September 15, 2025. Miran, who’s been Trump’s top economic advisor and a supporter of his trade ideas, joins a seven-member board where just three governors come from Democratic picks, according to the Fed’s records updated that same day. Crypto News: Miran’s Background and Quick Path to Confirmation The Senate greenlit Miran on September 15, 2025, with a tight 48-47 vote, following his nomination on September 2, 2025, as per a recent crypto news update. His stint runs only until January 31, 2026, stepping in for Adriana D. Kugler, who stepped down in August 2025 for reasons not made public. Miran earned his economics Ph.D. from Harvard and worked at the Treasury back in Trump’s first go-around. Afterward, he moved to Hudson Bay Capital Management as an economist, then looped back to the White House in December 2024 to head the Council of Economic Advisers. There, he helped craft Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs” approach, aimed at fixing trade gaps with China and the EU. He wouldn’t quit his White House gig, which irked Senator Elizabeth Warren at the September 7, 2025, confirmation hearings. That limited time frame means Miran gets to cast a vote straight away at the FOMC session starting September 16, 2025. The full board now features Chair Jerome H. Powell (Trump pick, term ends 2026), Vice Chair Philip N. Jefferson (Biden, to 2036), and folks like Lisa D. Cook (Biden, to 2028) and Michael S. Barr…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:14
Trump crypto company says ‘coordinated attack‘ on stablecoin failed

Trump crypto company says ‘coordinated attack‘ on stablecoin failed

The price of World Liberty Financial's token dipped about 7% early on Monday, later reported to be the result of a social media and short-seller attack.World Liberty
Share
Coinstats2026/02/24 01:56
Tron crypto Analysis: 3 Scenarios for TRXUSDT

Tron crypto Analysis: 3 Scenarios for TRXUSDT

The post Tron crypto Analysis: 3 Scenarios for TRXUSDT appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. While the broader crypto market leans risk‑off, Tron crypto (TRXUSDT
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/24 02:33