The post Are Trump’s Tariffs Still In Effect? Here’s What To Know. appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline An appellate court ruled most tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump are illegal, backing a lower court’s argument that the levies exceeded Trump’s authority, though the duties will remain in place for weeks as the Trump administration brings the case to the Supreme Court. Trump challenged the appellate court ruling and claimed the Supreme Court would likely keep his tariffs in place. Getty Images Key Facts The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled 7-4 late Friday that Trump overstepped his authority by issuing tariffs, as the court wrote the power to impose such tariffs is “vested exclusively in the legislative branch” and a “core Congressional power.” Dissenting judges argued Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)—a 1977 law allowing the president to regulate international trade—to justify his tariffs is not an “unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority.” The IEEPA neither mentions tariffs nor has “procedural safeguards” that set limits on the president’s power to impose tariffs and does not “give the president wide-ranging authority” to issue levies, the majority ruling said. The appellate court’s ruling does not take effect until Oct. 14, however, allowing the Trump administration time to appeal to the Supreme Court. “The president’s tariffs remain in effect, and we look forward to ultimate victory on this matter,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement. Chief Critic “ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT!” Trump wrote on Truth Social in criticism of the “Highly Partisan” appeals court. Trump claimed, “If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the country.” He suggested the Supreme Court would “help” keep the tariffs in place for the “benefit of our Nation,” adding if the appellate court’s ruling is “allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of… The post Are Trump’s Tariffs Still In Effect? Here’s What To Know. appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline An appellate court ruled most tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump are illegal, backing a lower court’s argument that the levies exceeded Trump’s authority, though the duties will remain in place for weeks as the Trump administration brings the case to the Supreme Court. Trump challenged the appellate court ruling and claimed the Supreme Court would likely keep his tariffs in place. Getty Images Key Facts The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled 7-4 late Friday that Trump overstepped his authority by issuing tariffs, as the court wrote the power to impose such tariffs is “vested exclusively in the legislative branch” and a “core Congressional power.” Dissenting judges argued Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)—a 1977 law allowing the president to regulate international trade—to justify his tariffs is not an “unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority.” The IEEPA neither mentions tariffs nor has “procedural safeguards” that set limits on the president’s power to impose tariffs and does not “give the president wide-ranging authority” to issue levies, the majority ruling said. The appellate court’s ruling does not take effect until Oct. 14, however, allowing the Trump administration time to appeal to the Supreme Court. “The president’s tariffs remain in effect, and we look forward to ultimate victory on this matter,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement. Chief Critic “ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT!” Trump wrote on Truth Social in criticism of the “Highly Partisan” appeals court. Trump claimed, “If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the country.” He suggested the Supreme Court would “help” keep the tariffs in place for the “benefit of our Nation,” adding if the appellate court’s ruling is “allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of…

Are Trump’s Tariffs Still In Effect? Here’s What To Know.

Topline

An appellate court ruled most tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump are illegal, backing a lower court’s argument that the levies exceeded Trump’s authority, though the duties will remain in place for weeks as the Trump administration brings the case to the Supreme Court.

Trump challenged the appellate court ruling and claimed the Supreme Court would likely keep his tariffs in place.

Getty Images

Key Facts

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled 7-4 late Friday that Trump overstepped his authority by issuing tariffs, as the court wrote the power to impose such tariffs is “vested exclusively in the legislative branch” and a “core Congressional power.”

Dissenting judges argued Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)—a 1977 law allowing the president to regulate international trade—to justify his tariffs is not an “unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority.”

The IEEPA neither mentions tariffs nor has “procedural safeguards” that set limits on the president’s power to impose tariffs and does not “give the president wide-ranging authority” to issue levies, the majority ruling said.

The appellate court’s ruling does not take effect until Oct. 14, however, allowing the Trump administration time to appeal to the Supreme Court.

“The president’s tariffs remain in effect, and we look forward to ultimate victory on this matter,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement.

Chief Critic

“ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT!” Trump wrote on Truth Social in criticism of the “Highly Partisan” appeals court. Trump claimed, “If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the country.” He suggested the Supreme Court would “help” keep the tariffs in place for the “benefit of our Nation,” adding if the appellate court’s ruling is “allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America.”

What Happens If Trump’s Tariffs Are Ruled Illegal?

The ruling covers Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs imposed on most U.S. trade partners, including additional rates on goods imported from China, Mexico and Canada. If upheld, the ruling would prevent the levies from being enforced, though other tariffs, including those imposed on steel, aluminum and copper, would remain in place because they were issued under a different presidential authority. It’s not immediately clear how the ruling would impact trade deals reached between the U.S. and countries like Japan, South Korea and others in response to the tariffs, or how the broader financial market would react.

Key Background

Trump unveiled wide-reaching tariffs on U.S. trade partners earlier this year, claiming authority to do as he argued an international trade imbalance was harming national security. Friday’s ruling upholds a decision from the Court of International Trade in May, which disputed Trump’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs under the IEEPA, ruling in favor of a consolidated lawsuit filed by a dozen states and five small businesses. The Trump administration has argued courts previously approved President Richard Nixon’s emergency use of tariffs in 1971 under earlier emergency powers legislation, though the Court of International Trade rejected the claim and said Trump’s tariffs “exceed any authority granted to the president” under the law.

Further Reading

ForbesTrump Says His Tariffs Collected ‘Trillions’ In Revenue So Far—Here’s The Real Figure

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2025/08/30/are-trumps-tariffs-still-in-effect-what-to-know-after-court-rules-most-levies-are-illegal/

Market Opportunity
Whiterock Logo
Whiterock Price(WHITE)
$0.0001318
$0.0001318$0.0001318
-5.85%
USD
Whiterock (WHITE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X, the most widely used app for crypto projects, is changing its API access policy. InfoFi projects, which proliferated non-organic bot content, will be cut off
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 02:50
X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

The post X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X has revoked API access for apps that reward users for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 03:42
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37