The post If selling $2 billion crashes the BTC price, why doesn’t buying $83B send it to space? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In the spirit of no stupid questions, Bitcoin influencer Crypto Tea released a post on X that many people are wondering but haven’t said out loud. If previously dormant whales can crash the BTC price by selling $2 billion in BTC, why doesn’t a year of relentless buying pressure to the tune of over $80 billion from Saylor and ETFs send it to the moon? The Bitcoin Therapist picked it up: “Explain how this is possible,” he pondered. Sudden trades vs algo buying Creator of The Bitcoin Quantile Model, Plan C, quickly came to the rescue to explain the phenomenon. A big fat-finger sale of $2 billion in BTC can send the market down faster than a piano from a 10-storey building. Yet the $83 billion gobbled up in 2025 by Michael Saylor and the ETF brigade? Well, that seems to leave the BTC price making slow, steady tracks rather than moonshots. What gives? The logic is almost boringly simple, Plan C explains: “Easy. To compare the impact of trades, you need to consider the rate of trading by dividing the total dollars by the time over which they occurred.” In other words: price moves at the edges, not the averages. Sudden, massive sell orders, especially in thin liquidity, can wipe out order books and cause sharp price drops. Algobot buying, on the other hand, is precisely designed to blend in, spread out, and avoid crashing the party. Buy $83 billion in a year, and you build a floor, not a rocket, unless the pace picks up. The Crypto Investor Blueprint: A 5-Day Course On Bagholding, Insider Front-Runs, and Missing Alpha Nice 😎 Your first lesson is on the way. Please add [email protected] to your email whitelist. ‘Paper’ Bitcoin: The X Factor But wait. What about paper Bitcoin? The Bitcoin… The post If selling $2 billion crashes the BTC price, why doesn’t buying $83B send it to space? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In the spirit of no stupid questions, Bitcoin influencer Crypto Tea released a post on X that many people are wondering but haven’t said out loud. If previously dormant whales can crash the BTC price by selling $2 billion in BTC, why doesn’t a year of relentless buying pressure to the tune of over $80 billion from Saylor and ETFs send it to the moon? The Bitcoin Therapist picked it up: “Explain how this is possible,” he pondered. Sudden trades vs algo buying Creator of The Bitcoin Quantile Model, Plan C, quickly came to the rescue to explain the phenomenon. A big fat-finger sale of $2 billion in BTC can send the market down faster than a piano from a 10-storey building. Yet the $83 billion gobbled up in 2025 by Michael Saylor and the ETF brigade? Well, that seems to leave the BTC price making slow, steady tracks rather than moonshots. What gives? The logic is almost boringly simple, Plan C explains: “Easy. To compare the impact of trades, you need to consider the rate of trading by dividing the total dollars by the time over which they occurred.” In other words: price moves at the edges, not the averages. Sudden, massive sell orders, especially in thin liquidity, can wipe out order books and cause sharp price drops. Algobot buying, on the other hand, is precisely designed to blend in, spread out, and avoid crashing the party. Buy $83 billion in a year, and you build a floor, not a rocket, unless the pace picks up. The Crypto Investor Blueprint: A 5-Day Course On Bagholding, Insider Front-Runs, and Missing Alpha Nice 😎 Your first lesson is on the way. Please add [email protected] to your email whitelist. ‘Paper’ Bitcoin: The X Factor But wait. What about paper Bitcoin? The Bitcoin…

If selling $2 billion crashes the BTC price, why doesn’t buying $83B send it to space?

2025/09/08 04:03

In the spirit of no stupid questions, Bitcoin influencer Crypto Tea released a post on X that many people are wondering but haven’t said out loud. If previously dormant whales can crash the BTC price by selling $2 billion in BTC, why doesn’t a year of relentless buying pressure to the tune of over $80 billion from Saylor and ETFs send it to the moon?

The Bitcoin Therapist picked it up:

Sudden trades vs algo buying

Creator of The Bitcoin Quantile Model, Plan C, quickly came to the rescue to explain the phenomenon. A big fat-finger sale of $2 billion in BTC can send the market down faster than a piano from a 10-storey building.

Yet the $83 billion gobbled up in 2025 by Michael Saylor and the ETF brigade? Well, that seems to leave the BTC price making slow, steady tracks rather than moonshots. What gives?

The logic is almost boringly simple, Plan C explains:

In other words: price moves at the edges, not the averages.

Sudden, massive sell orders, especially in thin liquidity, can wipe out order books and cause sharp price drops. Algobot buying, on the other hand, is precisely designed to blend in, spread out, and avoid crashing the party. Buy $83 billion in a year, and you build a floor, not a rocket, unless the pace picks up.

‘Paper’ Bitcoin: The X Factor

But wait. What about paper Bitcoin? The Bitcoin Therapist asks. You know, the supply we think we see on exchanges? Plan C’s take:

Reported purchases might be diluted if significant volumes of “paper” Bitcoin (IOUs or synthetics) are traded instead of real coins, creating the illusion of buy pressure without actually moving real coins off the market.

What really moves the BTC price?

Ultimately, the difference comes down to pace, execution, and market structure. ETF and institutional buying in 2025 was deliberate, steady, and highly fragmented across exchanges and OTC desks, sometimes even facilitated by algorithmic order books designed to minimize price impact.

Crashes, by contrast, tend to be abrupt, concentrated, and, yes, panic-inducing, particularly when carried out over thin liquidity weekends.

So, the next time a headline screams market meltdown over a quick $2 billion dump, remember it’s not just the size, it’s the speed and the source. Slow burns build floors. Sudden shocks bring flames. And somewhere in between, paper Bitcoin lurks as the market’s ultimate wildcard.

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/if-selling-2-billion-crashes-the-btc-price-why-doesnt-buying-83b-send-it-to-space/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FinanceWire partners with TipRanks to expand financial news distribution

FinanceWire partners with TipRanks to expand financial news distribution

The post FinanceWire partners with TipRanks to expand financial news distribution appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. FinanceWire, the financial press release distribution platform owned by MediaFuse, has partnered with investment research provider TipRanks to bring company announcements directly onto investor-facing platforms, as per the information shared with Finbold on September 19. The integration allows public companies and financial firms to place press releases on stock symbol pages within TipRanks, a platform widely used by individual investors and institutions. The service is already being utilized by firms listed on major exchanges including NASDAQ and NYSE. “This partnership reflects where the industry is headed,” said Nadav Dakner, founder and CEO of MediaFuse and FinanceWire. “Companies want visibility that reaches real investors — not vanity distribution buried in press release feeds. With TipRanks, we’re helping define a new category of press release distribution: targeted, guaranteed, and embedded inside the investor experience.” Uri Gruenbaum, CEO of TipRanks, added:  “FinanceWire is helping reshape how financial news reaches the market. We’re proud to support their mission to deliver verified information to investors more effectively, and to enhance visibility for public companies in a targeted, credible way.” Expanding visibility  According to FinanceWire, its model is designed to differ from traditional wire services by securing placements in high-visibility sections of investor-focused outlets, including TipRanks, Yahoo Finance, MarketWatch, Business Insider, Investing.com, Benzinga, TheStreet, and TradingView.  Rather than being archived in secondary feeds, company announcements appear directly on platforms where investors monitor markets and research stocks. The platform has already been used by multiple companies across global exchanges to distribute press releases within these channels. Featured image via Shutterstock. Source: https://finbold.com/financewire-partners-with-tipranks-to-expand-financial-news-distribution/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 17:19
‘Already seen the low?’ – Inside Cathie Wood’s bet on a new Bitcoin cycle

‘Already seen the low?’ – Inside Cathie Wood’s bet on a new Bitcoin cycle

The post ‘Already seen the low?’ – Inside Cathie Wood’s bet on a new Bitcoin cycle appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin has rarely looked more fragile, and many analysts are already referring to this as the worst fourth quarter on record, marked by a massive leverage wipeout and a steep drop from its all-time highs. For over a decade, Bitcoin [BTC] has followed a harsh, predictable pattern: a Halving event, a commendable rally to new highs, and then a brutal 75–90% crash that resets the entire market. This cycle shaped the crypto world and created the “crypto winter” mentality that traders have come to expect. Cathie Wood challenges the four-year cycle But according to Cathie Wood, CEO and CIO of ARK Invest, those old rules no longer apply. Speaking with Fox Business, Wood made a profound declaration: institutional adoption is actively “disrupting” the traditional Bitcoin cycle. Wood noted that growing participation in U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs had started to change how BTC absorbed volatility. She pointed to a steady decline in its two-year volatility trend over the past five years, adding fuel to the idea of a maturing asset. Why Bitcoin’s old pattern may be fading Wood’s view challenges over a decade of beliefs built around Bitcoin’s strict, predictable four-year cycle. The evidence for this cycle is compelling.  For instance, the 2012 Halving saw Bitcoin surge from under $10 to a peak of roughly $1,100; the 2016 Halving fueled a climb from $400 to nearly $20,000; and the 2020 Halving propelled the asset from $8,500 to a record high of around $69,000. Each of these explosive rallies was followed by a painful, defining drawdown of 70% to 85%, resetting the stage for the next run. This predictable pattern, last triggered by the 20th April 2024, Halving, has historically been the sole script for investors. Yet, this time, the narrative feels disjointed and disruptive. What is Wood so concerned about? Wood…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 19:15