Court dismissed Anti-Terrorism Act lawsuits against Binance, citing weak claims and no evidence linking the exchange to terrorism. Binance has secured another legalCourt dismissed Anti-Terrorism Act lawsuits against Binance, citing weak claims and no evidence linking the exchange to terrorism. Binance has secured another legal

U.S. Court Dismisses Anti-Terrorism Claims Against Binance in Alabama

2026/03/13 03:15
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Court dismissed Anti-Terrorism Act lawsuits against Binance, citing weak claims and no evidence linking the exchange to terrorism.

Binance has secured another legal victory in the United States. A federal court in Alabama dismissed all claims against the crypto exchange under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA). The ruling comes shortly after a similar decision in New York that also rejected accusations against the company. 

Alabama Court Finds Lawsuit Against Binance Legally Deficient

Binance secured another legal victory after a U.S. federal court in Alabama dismissed a lawsuit accusing the exchange of violating the Anti-Terrorism Act. This marks Binance’s second major legal win in the United States within two weeks.

In a 19-page ruling, the court found the complaint lacked enough facts to support the claims. The judge said the lawsuit did not meet basic legal requirements. Court documents described the filing as a “shotgun pleading,” meaning the lawsuit grouped several defendants together without clearly explaining what each allegedly did.

According to the judge, the complaint also failed to clearly set out the allegations against Binance. It did not provide a clear explanation of the alleged wrongdoing.

U.S. legal rules require plaintiffs to present a short and clear statement of their claims. The court ruled that the lawsuit did not meet that standard.

However, the plaintiffs were allowed to amend the complaint. The court gave them until April 10, 2026, to correct the problems identified in the ruling. Failure to do so could lead to the dismissal of the entire case.

Second Federal Court Finds No Evidence in Anti-Terrorism Case Against Binance

At the same time, legal observers point to a wider pattern in recent rulings involving Binance. Another U.S. federal court recently dismissed a similar lawsuit against the exchange.

Earlier this month, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected Anti-Terrorism Act claims filed against Binance. The case involved 535 plaintiffs who alleged links between the exchange and 64 terrorist attacks.

In a 62-page ruling, the court dismissed those accusations. Judges said there was no evidence that Binance supported terrorist groups or assisted their activities.

The court also rejected claims that the company took part in conspiracies tied to the attacks. Similar to the recent case, the plaintiffs failed to prove that Binance had any connection to terrorist operations.

Binance officials also stressed ongoing efforts related to compliance and governance. The company has invested heavily in compliance systems and regulatory engagement over the past few years. Legal teams say these measures aim to strengthen oversight across the exchange’s global operations.

The post U.S. Court Dismisses Anti-Terrorism Claims Against Binance in Alabama appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.000861
$0.000861$0.000861
+1.94%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.