President Donald Trump’s proposed AI bill, known as the TRUMP AMERICA AI Act, was denounced by a right-leaning think tank on Friday for a number of reasons — includingPresident Donald Trump’s proposed AI bill, known as the TRUMP AMERICA AI Act, was denounced by a right-leaning think tank on Friday for a number of reasons — including

'Make users numb': Trump bill slammed as dangerous by right-wing think tank

2026/03/20 08:33
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

President Donald Trump’s proposed AI bill, known as the TRUMP AMERICA AI Act, was denounced by a right-leaning think tank on Friday for a number of reasons — including how it will potentially infringe on free speech.

“The proposal isn’t the light-touch, pro-innovation approach that seeks to make America’s tech sector the leader in this global market but a kitchen sink of internet and AI regulation that could create more problems than it solves at a critical moment,” wrote The Cato Institute on Friday. Authors Kevin T. Frazier and Jennifer Huddleston described the 291 page draft bill as put forward by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) as a “poor path forward if the United States is going to lead on AI. While a few specific elements of the Trump administration’s AI Action Plan raise their own concerns, Senator Blackburn’s proposal would significantly shift the US away from the light-touch regulatory approach that has traditionally allowed it to flourish as a global leader in new technologies.”

The authors proceeded to list several issues with the bill. For one thing, it would allegedly enact “burdensome requirements under the guise of protecting children that could instead censor speech and limit access to information,” raising the specter of precisely the type of state-pressured censorship that libertarians traditionally denounce. Second, they argued it places an “onerous ‘duty of care’ on AI developers that could unnecessarily slow design, development, and operation of AI.”

They also claim the bill “weaponizes the Copyright Act of 1976” in ways that will impede AI development and “harms competition by enabling the US attorney general, state attorneys general, and private actors to file suit to hold AI system developers liable for harms caused by the AI system for defective design, failure to warn, express warranty, and unreasonably dangerous or defective product claims.” Even a provision one might expect conservatives to support, requiring AI systems to not include ideologically biased language, alarms The Cato Institute because it “would not only compel labs to train their models in certain ways but also create an AI-audit industrial complex.”

Trump has used his power as president to pressure AI companies or penalize them for crossing him. When the AI firm Anthropic pushed back against Trump for demanding policies that they claimed crossed ethical guidelines, Trump fired Anthropic from its defense contracts and is now attempting to harm their business further by branding them a security risk. Yet Trump’s critics worry his actions toward Anthropic may actually put America at risk.

“President Trump on Friday banned Anthropic and its AI products from all government contracts, and the Communists must be cheering in Beijing,” The Wall Street Journal’s Editorial Board wrote in February. “The Administration is making what is a modest dispute over the military uses of AI into a self-destructive show of brute political force that will hurt the U.S. military and the rest of the government.”

By contrast the AI firm OpenAI has continued to work with the Trump administration, much to the consternation of many supporters of CEO Sam Altman.

“This process is messy,” Altman told critics in March. “This process has some deep flaws, but it is better than all other systems. If we start abandoning that process and our commitment to it because, you know, some people don’t like the person or people currently in charge, that is challenged no matter what. I think it’s bad for society no matter what.”

He also insisted that OpenAI has not violated Americans’ civil liberties.

“I think one of the civil liberties of this country that’s most important is the government does not spy without, you know, warrants and good legal process on its own citizens,” Altman said. “The definition of what that is going to mean needs to change with technology.”

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.387
$3.387$3.387
+0.53%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Payroll giant Gusto adds USDC as a payment option for international contractors for the same day.

Payroll giant Gusto adds USDC as a payment option for international contractors for the same day.

PANews reported on March 20th that, according to SolanaFloor, payroll services giant Gusto has added a same-day payment option for international contractors, supporting
Share
PANews2026/03/20 10:55
US charges 3 tied to Super Micro Computer with helping smuggle AI chips to China

US charges 3 tied to Super Micro Computer with helping smuggle AI chips to China

The scheme sees US-made servers being sent through Taiwan to other countries in Southeast Asia, where they are swapped into unmarked boxes and sent onward to China
Share
Rappler2026/03/20 11:36