The post DeFi Hacks Top $137M in Early 2026 as Security Failures Mount appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Over $137 million was stolen across 15 DeFi protocolsThe post DeFi Hacks Top $137M in Early 2026 as Security Failures Mount appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Over $137 million was stolen across 15 DeFi protocols

DeFi Hacks Top $137M in Early 2026 as Security Failures Mount

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
  • Over $137 million was stolen across 15 DeFi protocols, with only $9 million recovered.
  • Step Finance, Truebit, and Resolv are among the biggest victims of hacks and exploits.
  • Most attacks are linked to preventable issues like private key leaks and smart contract bugs.

The decentralized finance industry is barely three months into 2026, and it has already suffered one of its worst security starts on record. Across 15 protocols, hackers have drained over $137 million in funds since January. 

Since then, only $9 million has been recovered.

Biggest DeFi Hacks in 2026

The largest single loss belongs to Step Finance, which saw $27.3 million drained through a compromised private key. Truebit followed closely at $26.2 million, lost to a smart contract bug.

Resolv (USR) lost more than $25 million through a minting vulnerability, while SwapNet hemorrhaged $13.4 million via an arbitrary call exploit. 

Source: CipherResearchx

YieldBlox DAO lost nearly $11 million to oracle manipulation but managed to recover $7.2 million, making it the only protocol to claw back a meaningful portion of stolen funds.

Rounding out the top ten are SagaEVM at $7 million, Makina at $5 million, IoTeX at $4.4 million, and both Aperture Finance and Venus Protocol at $3.7 million each.

Common Vulnerabilities Behind Attacks

What makes these losses particularly damning is not their scale. It is how preventable most of them were.

Compromised private keys, the attack vector behind the Step Finance and IoTeX exploits, are not protocol flaws. They are operational security failures. Oracle manipulation and reentrancy attacks, responsible for millions more in losses, have well-documented defences that have existed for years. Yet they keep working.

Smart contract bugs, validation failures, logic flaws, and supply cap manipulation round out an attack surface that security researchers have been flagging since DeFi’s earliest days.

Recovery Rate Remains Low

At $137 million in under three months, 2026 is on track to become one of the worst years in DeFi security history if the pace holds. New protocols continue launching without proper audits, expanding the attack surface faster than the industry can defend it.

Of the $137 million stolen across 15 protocols, the recovery rate sits at just 6.5 cents on the dollar.

For an industry built on the promise of trustless security, that number is very hard to defend.

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/defi-hacks-top-137m-in-early-2026-as-security-failures-mount/

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000356
$0.000356$0.000356
+13.37%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.