As a star project of the Solana ecosystem, Jupiter once played a core role with its high liquidity share, but the Libra scandal and the overall ecological crisis have plunged it into a quagmire. Despite this, Jupiter is trying to send a signal to the outside world that it can break through the headwind through multiple strategies such as ecological expansion, token repurchase plan, and product iteration.As a star project of the Solana ecosystem, Jupiter once played a core role with its high liquidity share, but the Libra scandal and the overall ecological crisis have plunged it into a quagmire. Despite this, Jupiter is trying to send a signal to the outside world that it can break through the headwind through multiple strategies such as ecological expansion, token repurchase plan, and product iteration.

From the Libra scandal to Solana’s loss of money, can Jupiter’s multi-strategy layout restore market confidence?

2025/03/05 13:00
7 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Author: Nancy, PANews

At present, the Solana ecosystem is experiencing a "bleeding" crisis triggered by the Libra coin issuance scandal. The double blow of liquidity loss and market confidence has exacerbated the challenges within the ecosystem. As a star project in the Solana ecosystem, Jupiter once played a core role with its ultra-high liquidity share, but the involvement of the Libra scandal and the overall ecological crisis have plunged it into a quagmire. Despite this, Jupiter has recently been trying to send a signal to the outside world that it can break through the headwind through a number of strategies such as ecological expansion, token repurchase plans, and product iterations.

Trading engine slows down? Jupiter still has advantages in Solana ecosystem

Jupiter once drove the prosperity of the Solana ecosystem with its strong market appeal, but the Solana ecosystem confidence crisis has slowed down its trading engine and it is difficult to remain immune.

Artemis data shows that Jupiter's daily trading volume reached a historical peak of $2.9 billion in mid-January this year. However, trading activity has gradually declined since then. As of March 3, the daily trading volume fell back to $1.2 billion, a sharp drop of 58.6% from the peak.

The change in the number of daily active addresses also reveals the decline in community participation. On January 20 of this year, Jupiter's active addresses hit a new high of 1.2 million, highlighting its user participation boom at the time. However, as of March 3, this number has dropped sharply to 394,000, a drop of 67.2%. The sharp drop in active addresses not only points to a slowdown in trading activity, but also suggests that users' confidence in Jupiter and even the Solana ecosystem has been impacted. However, Solana's overall daily active addresses also fell by about 48.1% during the same period, which also shows that Jupiter's decline is synchronized with the overall ecological environment.

From the Libra scandal to Solana’s loss of money, can Jupiter’s multi-strategy layout restore market confidence?

The weakening of trading activity directly affected Jupiter's revenue performance. Artemis data showed that its aggregator's daily revenue fell 83.3% from a peak of $1.3 million to only $216,000 as of March 3. This weakness in revenue also reflects Jupiter's vulnerability in the current market environment.

Despite the pressure on trading activity and revenue, Jupiter's weight in the Solana ecosystem still shows a certain resilience. Artemis data shows that Jupiter's daily trading volume accounts for 11.6% of Solana's total, a slight increase from the peak of 10.4% in January. However, Jupiter's daily active address share has dropped by 36.5% from the peak, accounting for 9.4% of Solana as of March 3.

From the Libra scandal to Solana’s loss of money, can Jupiter’s multi-strategy layout restore market confidence?

From the perspective of ecological ranking, according to Artemis data, since 2025, Jupiter has been ranked second in the Solana ecosystem with a daily transaction volume of US$260 million, second only to Raydium; the number of daily active addresses is 572,000, ranking third; and the gas fee consumption contributed US$45.7 million, ranking second. These data also show that Jupiter still maintains the role of Solana's core liquidity pillar, but its influence has been reduced.

In addition, the official website shows that the total staked amount of JUP exceeds 580 million, accounting for more than 21.5% of the circulation, which also reflects the community's continued participation in JUP DAO governance, or providing a short-term selling pressure buffer for the token.

From trust crisis to long-termism, Jupiter's multi-line layout restores confidence

The Libra scandal was the trigger for Jupiter to fall into the quagmire. In the LIbra insider trading scandal in February this year, Libra created a liquidity pool on Meteora, and Jupiter was accused of colluding with Meteora due to Meow's dual identity (Meteora co-founder). Although Meteora co-founder Ben resigned afterwards, and Jupiter responded that it did not participate in the issuance of Libra in any form, saying that no team members were found to have rushed to buy shares, it did not save Jupiter from the reputation crisis, and its token JUP also fell for a time.

"We talk about crypto being the future, but in reality, there is often a lack of commitment to long-termism and accountability for results. One thing is certain: we believe in what we are doing, we believe in being responsible for long-term results, and we believe that the crypto industry will truly change the world in the future, no matter how volatile the short-term situation is," Meow said in a recent post.

Faced with the slowdown of the Solana ecosystem and the Libra turmoil, Jupiter has responded with a variety of strategies. In recent times, it has announced a multi-pronged layout including acquisition expansion, token economic adjustment and transparent governance, in an effort to regain market trust.

In terms of ecological expansion, Jupiter has made a number of recruitments and acquisitions in the past year, including the acquisition of majority stakes in Sonarwatch and Moonshot in recent months, and is currently conducting two unannounced acquisitions to enhance the team and the capabilities of the three pillar platforms Jup.ag, Jupiverse and Jupnet. The acquisition funds will be paid by the treasury.

In terms of token value empowerment, Jupiter recently announced that an independent third party will conduct a comprehensive audit of the founders, Jupiter Treasury, Meteora Treasury and JUP tokens; at the same time, Jupiter established the Litterbox Trust, which is managed by an independent third party and has begun operations. In the next two years, it will receive 50% of the protocol's income for strategic accumulation of JUP, aiming to enhance the long-term stability of tokens. Officials said that this move does not involve short-term gains, but is a layout for the long-term development of the ecosystem and community. Artemis data shows that as of March 3, Jupiter has repurchased $10.8 million worth of JUP since February 17.

From the Libra scandal to Solana’s loss of money, can Jupiter’s multi-strategy layout restore market confidence?

Moreover, Meow recently proposed the "2030 Proposal", planning to use its 280 million personal JUP tokens for team incentives and receive 500 million JUP as compensation in 2030. The proposal still needs to be decided by the community vote. Jupiter also recently announced the launch of the "GOAT Framework", which aims to make JUP the best token in the crypto industry and establish its position as a long-term token through four core dimensions: governance (including 30% supply destruction, "Jupuary" activities and working group budget adjustments and other key decisions), organicity (emphasizing the rejection of backroom deals, KOL promotion or market manipulation), consistency (cooperation with holders, community and team interests) and transparency (three token audits, multi-signature wallet disclosure and large-amount flow records).

In addition, Jupiter has also recently announced its 2030 team strategy, which will focus on decentralized liquidity platforms, global community expansion and Jupnet ecology in the next five years. It also plans to allocate 280 million JUP to new team members in the next three years (the startup team currently holds 1.4 billion JUP), but the source of funds requires community decision-making. There are two main options: one is to use strategic reserve funding, which will be unlocked from July 2025 without community voting; the other is to pay from Meow's personal holdings, which will be recovered from the strategic reserve in 2030, and apply for an additional 220 million JUP as an incentive (DAO adjustable).

In terms of product iteration, Jupiter merged with ApePro and changed its name to Jup Trenches, which can provide functions including dual account types, private key export, real-time data, etc. Jupiter Mobile launched last year will also undergo major updates.

In general, although the slowdown of the trading engine has put Jupiter under pressure in the short term, its position as the core pillar of the Solana ecosystem has not been lost. Whether it can stop the bleeding of the ecosystem or even achieve positive growth in the future by relying on the diversified strategic layout and the recovery of Solana still needs time to verify.

Market Opportunity
TokenFi Logo
TokenFi Price(TOKEN)
$0.002946
$0.002946$0.002946
+3.36%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

PANews reported on June 18 that according to Jinshi, a US White House adviser said that the cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage, which will create demand for the
Share
PANews2025/06/18 23:52
SEC approves Grayscale’s multi-crypto fund with XRP, SOL and ADA

SEC approves Grayscale’s multi-crypto fund with XRP, SOL and ADA

GDLC's approval coincides with SEC adopting generic listing standards for crypto ETFs, which would expedite the launch process.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 10:26