TLDR Sam Bankman-Fried claims FTX was “never insolvent.” He blames bankruptcy lawyers and CEO John J. Ray III for its downfall. The document argues FTX could have repaid customers in 2022. His family is lobbying for a Trump pardon as part of a PR campaign. Most experts dismiss the claims as an attempt to rewrite [...] The post Sam Bankman-Fried Publishes Document Claiming FTX Was Solvent appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Sam Bankman-Fried claims FTX was “never insolvent.” He blames bankruptcy lawyers and CEO John J. Ray III for its downfall. The document argues FTX could have repaid customers in 2022. His family is lobbying for a Trump pardon as part of a PR campaign. Most experts dismiss the claims as an attempt to rewrite [...] The post Sam Bankman-Fried Publishes Document Claiming FTX Was Solvent appeared first on CoinCentral.

Sam Bankman-Fried Publishes Document Claiming FTX Was Solvent

TLDR

  • Sam Bankman-Fried claims FTX was “never insolvent.”

  • He blames bankruptcy lawyers and CEO John J. Ray III for its downfall.

  • The document argues FTX could have repaid customers in 2022.

  • His family is lobbying for a Trump pardon as part of a PR campaign.

  • Most experts dismiss the claims as an attempt to rewrite history.


Sam Bankman-Fried, the imprisoned founder of the collapsed crypto exchange FTX, has resurfaced online with a lengthy defense document. He claims the company “was never insolvent” and could have repaid customers in full.

The 15-page statement, posted on X, argues that bankruptcy lawyers—not bad management—were responsible for destroying what he describes as a solvent but illiquid company. He accuses them of “decimating” FTX’s assets through unnecessary filings and mismanagement.

FTX “Could Have Been Worth $136 Billion”

The document, dated September 30, includes detailed tables of hypothetical valuations. It claims that FTX and its trading arm Alameda Research held $25 billion in assets and $16 billion in equity when the company collapsed in November 2022.

According to Bankman-Fried, the company’s liquidity crisis could have been resolved within weeks if outside counsel hadn’t taken control. He alleges that bankruptcy teams sold assets below market value and discarded billions in native FTT tokens, reducing overall recoveries.

The post marks the latest phase in a broader public relations effort by the former crypto mogul. His parents and legal allies are reportedly lobbying for a presidential pardon from Donald Trump. They have enlisted attorney Kory Langhofer, known for ties to the Republican Party, and even arranged media outreach through conservative channels.

Prediction market traders on Kalshi currently give Bankman-Fried about a 10% chance of receiving a pardon. Still, his renewed push on social media appears designed to shift public opinion and portray himself as a victim of legal overreach.

During his trial, Bankman-Fried was barred from presenting financial evidence supporting his solvency claims. Prosecutors argued that he illegally used customer deposits to cover losses at Alameda, violating basic trust and risk controls.

FTX’s Real Financial Picture

Court filings tell a very different story. Evidence showed that Alameda had a secret exemption from FTX’s risk engine, allowing it to borrow billions in customer funds without collateral. When this was exposed, customers rushed to withdraw their money, leaving an $8 billion hole in the balance sheet.

FTX’s 2022 collapse wiped out around $200 billion in crypto market value and triggered a regulatory crackdown worldwide. Bankman-Fried was convicted in 2023 on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy and is now serving a 25-year sentence.

The new claims, while detailed, have yet to be verified by the bankruptcy estate or independent analysts. For now, Bankman-Fried’s defense appears more like an effort to rewrite the FTX narrative than a credible financial audit.


Summary: Sam Bankman-Fried claims FTX was solvent, blaming lawyers for its downfall, but evidence suggests otherwise.

The post Sam Bankman-Fried Publishes Document Claiming FTX Was Solvent appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
John Tsubasa Rivals Logo
John Tsubasa Rivals Price(JOHN)
$0.008
$0.008$0.008
+1.39%
USD
John Tsubasa Rivals (JOHN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Superstate Raises Over $82 Million to Develop Onchain Capital Markets

Superstate Raises Over $82 Million to Develop Onchain Capital Markets

Superstate announced that it has raised $82.5 million in a Series B funding round. The capital will be used to develop infrastructure for issuing and trading shares
Share
Incrypted2026/01/23 00:13
Valicor Brings Financial Education to Second High School in Underserved Community

Valicor Brings Financial Education to Second High School in Underserved Community

Partnership with Ramsey Education expands from Cincinnati to Michigan, equipping students with essential money management skills. MONROE, Ohio., Jan. 22, 2026 /
Share
AI Journal2026/01/22 23:50