The post Scott Purcell’s Fortress Trust fails like Prime Trust before it appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Prime Trust and Fortress Trust, Scott Purcell’s two crypto custodians that previously boasted clients BinanceUS, Swan Bitcoin, Abra, and TrueUSD, have both collapsed after disturbing allegations of financial misconduct. On October 22, Nevada’s Financial Institutions Division revealed that several third-party businesses declined to follow through on acquisition offers or provide sufficient bridge financing for Fortress Trust, the successor to Purcell’s first failed attempt at crypto custody, Prime Trust. This month’s collapse of Fortress Trust is eerily similar to Purcell’s 2023 failure.  Prime Trust filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2023 after its Banq subsidiary collapsed and Nevada’s Financial Institutions Division revealed that it had improperly utilized customers’ funds to cover others’ withdrawals. The former president of the Bank of Nevada had to step in as receiver. Regulators revealed Prime Trust’s staggering obligations as of June 26, 2023: $85.6 million in cash obligations against just $2.9 million in cash. They also revealed Prime Trust’s alleged loss of crypto wallet keys in December 2021 that it had hidden from public view for years. A couple of months later, the company filed for bankruptcy. By that point, it had switched CEOs from Tom Pageler to Jor Law but none of their turnaround efforts succeeded. BTW The Prime Trust insolvency was shady asf They didn’t fat finger a transaction. They didn’t get hacked. They merely “lost” their private key. Don’t be surprised if one day this wallet randomly awakens and Scott Purcell is no where to be foundhttps://t.co/tphI5SsENn — Pledditor (@Pledditor) October 25, 2025 Scott Purcell creates Fortress Trust As Purcell faded away from Prime Trust in 2021, he began creating the similar Fortress Trust. Somehow, he convinced Nevada financial regulators to grant Fortress Trust a trust company license by May 2022.  They would soon come to regret that decision. By September 2023,… The post Scott Purcell’s Fortress Trust fails like Prime Trust before it appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Prime Trust and Fortress Trust, Scott Purcell’s two crypto custodians that previously boasted clients BinanceUS, Swan Bitcoin, Abra, and TrueUSD, have both collapsed after disturbing allegations of financial misconduct. On October 22, Nevada’s Financial Institutions Division revealed that several third-party businesses declined to follow through on acquisition offers or provide sufficient bridge financing for Fortress Trust, the successor to Purcell’s first failed attempt at crypto custody, Prime Trust. This month’s collapse of Fortress Trust is eerily similar to Purcell’s 2023 failure.  Prime Trust filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2023 after its Banq subsidiary collapsed and Nevada’s Financial Institutions Division revealed that it had improperly utilized customers’ funds to cover others’ withdrawals. The former president of the Bank of Nevada had to step in as receiver. Regulators revealed Prime Trust’s staggering obligations as of June 26, 2023: $85.6 million in cash obligations against just $2.9 million in cash. They also revealed Prime Trust’s alleged loss of crypto wallet keys in December 2021 that it had hidden from public view for years. A couple of months later, the company filed for bankruptcy. By that point, it had switched CEOs from Tom Pageler to Jor Law but none of their turnaround efforts succeeded. BTW The Prime Trust insolvency was shady asf They didn’t fat finger a transaction. They didn’t get hacked. They merely “lost” their private key. Don’t be surprised if one day this wallet randomly awakens and Scott Purcell is no where to be foundhttps://t.co/tphI5SsENn — Pledditor (@Pledditor) October 25, 2025 Scott Purcell creates Fortress Trust As Purcell faded away from Prime Trust in 2021, he began creating the similar Fortress Trust. Somehow, he convinced Nevada financial regulators to grant Fortress Trust a trust company license by May 2022.  They would soon come to regret that decision. By September 2023,…

Scott Purcell’s Fortress Trust fails like Prime Trust before it

Prime Trust and Fortress Trust, Scott Purcell’s two crypto custodians that previously boasted clients BinanceUS, Swan Bitcoin, Abra, and TrueUSD, have both collapsed after disturbing allegations of financial misconduct.

On October 22, Nevada’s Financial Institutions Division revealed that several third-party businesses declined to follow through on acquisition offers or provide sufficient bridge financing for Fortress Trust, the successor to Purcell’s first failed attempt at crypto custody, Prime Trust.

This month’s collapse of Fortress Trust is eerily similar to Purcell’s 2023 failure. 

Prime Trust filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2023 after its Banq subsidiary collapsed and Nevada’s Financial Institutions Division revealed that it had improperly utilized customers’ funds to cover others’ withdrawals.

The former president of the Bank of Nevada had to step in as receiver.

Regulators revealed Prime Trust’s staggering obligations as of June 26, 2023: $85.6 million in cash obligations against just $2.9 million in cash.

They also revealed Prime Trust’s alleged loss of crypto wallet keys in December 2021 that it had hidden from public view for years.

A couple of months later, the company filed for bankruptcy. By that point, it had switched CEOs from Tom Pageler to Jor Law but none of their turnaround efforts succeeded.

Scott Purcell creates Fortress Trust

As Purcell faded away from Prime Trust in 2021, he began creating the similar Fortress Trust. Somehow, he convinced Nevada financial regulators to grant Fortress Trust a trust company license by May 2022. 

They would soon come to regret that decision.

By September 2023, Fortress Trust claimed a “hack” had resulted in approximately $15 million in customer losses.

In early September 2023, Fortress initially stated there was “no loss of funds,” although subsequent reporting revealed a different truth.

On September 8, 2023, Ripple announced it had agreed to acquire Fortress Trust and cover those customer losses. However, by September 28, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse announced the company would not proceed with the acquisition, though Ripple would remain an investor.​

Read more: Fortress Trust says ‘no loss of funds’ as its customers’ crypto was stolen

In 2023 — similar to his departure from the collapsing Prime Trust in 2021 — Purcell stopped serving as CEO of Fortress Trust. The company would go through a couple of new CEOs, Rich Hauschild and Anthony Botticella.

Unfortunately, just like Prime Trust’s executive carousel, they would fail to prevent insolvency.

Finally, on October 22 this year, the Nevada Financial Institutions Division issued a cease-and-desist order against Fortress Trust, finding the company “on the verge of insolvency” with assets “wholly inadequate to meet customer obligations.”

The order prevents Fortress Trust from accepting fiat currency, crypto assets, or commodities from existing or new clients for custodial purposes.​

A pattern of behavior from Prime Trust to Fortress Trust

In a declaration filed alongside Fortress Trust’s cease and desist order, Botticella stated, “I learned after assuming the position of chief executive officer that the trust was experiencing severe financial difficulties and challenges related to events that occurred prior to assuming my role.”

Both Prime Trust and Fortress Trust collapsed under similar circumstances: Failure to properly safeguard customer assets, inability to meet customer withdrawals, and critical shortfalls between liabilities and funds that are hidden from public view for months or more.

Both companies were Nevada-chartered companies that served the crypto industry, and both failures resulted in Nevada regulatory intervention citing unsound business practices.

The two failures, sharing the same founder, reiterate the risks of centralized custodians generally and Purcell in particular.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/scott-purcells-fortress-trust-fails-like-prime-trust-before-it/

Market Opportunity
Wink Logo
Wink Price(LIKE)
$0,002764
$0,002764$0,002764
+0,47%
USD
Wink (LIKE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

Exploring how the costs of a pandemic can lead to a self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy, analyzing the resulting changes in network structure and the existence of stable equilibria.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:00