Switzerland is offering to pour money into U.S. gold-refining plants in a push to get President Donald Trump to drop the 39% import tax slammed on its goods last month, according to reporting from Bloomberg. That tax, the steepest seen in any developed country, is already cutting into Swiss export numbers and dragging growth predictions […]Switzerland is offering to pour money into U.S. gold-refining plants in a push to get President Donald Trump to drop the 39% import tax slammed on its goods last month, according to reporting from Bloomberg. That tax, the steepest seen in any developed country, is already cutting into Swiss export numbers and dragging growth predictions […]

Switzerland is offering to invest in U.S. gold-refining operations

2025/09/30 01:42
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Switzerland is offering to pour money into U.S. gold-refining plants in a push to get President Donald Trump to drop the 39% import tax slammed on its goods last month, according to reporting from Bloomberg.

That tax, the steepest seen in any developed country, is already cutting into Swiss export numbers and dragging growth predictions down. After an earlier attempt by Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter to push back on Trump blew up in her face, officials are now switching tactics. They’re dangling sweeteners across energy, farming, and now gold.

The offer made to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer includes sending Switzerland’s lowest-profit refining work to U.S. soil. That means moving the job of melting down large London gold bars and turning them into smaller ones preferred in New York—work that earns refiners just a few bucks per bar even when prices top $3,800 an ounce. The Swiss government didn’t want to talk specifics, but said it had “optimized its offer to the U.S. in order to reach a swift agreement.” It added that talks would continue with the goal of slashing the new tariffs as quickly as possible.

Swiss bullion exports flood U.S., trigger political backlash

This all kicked off when Trump’s tariff threat created a window for gold traders. They moved quickly to dump gold into America before any official action landed. That short-term play turned into a problem when bullion made up more than two-thirds of Switzerland’s trade surplus with the U.S. in the first quarter alone. The canton of Ticino, home to the world’s biggest gold refineries, became the center of it all. With Swiss refineries running nonstop to melt and recast bars, a surplus exploded. That imbalance brought backlash from across the Swiss political map.

Nick Hayek, CEO of Swatch Group, and Lisa Mazzone, President of the Green Party, both called for a tax on gold exports. Hayek even said Switzerland should slap a 39% tax on gold bars headed to the U.S. to mirror what Trump had done. That came after Trump said U.S. gold imports were safe from his tariffs—further stirring the pot. Mazzone argued that gold refining carries serious reputational risks for the country and doesn’t give back enough economically. “The industry carries a reputational risk but doesn’t bring a large net benefit to the economy,” she said. “If this sector costs so much to Switzerland, particularly right now because of the tariff dispute, then it should contribute more.”

Mazzone’s concerns trace back decades. During World War II, Swiss banks took in looted Nazi gold. In 1968, three of those banks built the Zurich Gold Pool, launching Switzerland into bullion dominance by refining massive amounts of gold, including from apartheid-era South Africa. Professor Mark Pieth, who wrote the book Gold Laundering, has detailed this murky past. Ownership in the industry has changed since then, but the thin profits haven’t. Even now, refiners only pull a couple dollars per bar despite record gold prices.

Refiners push back as industry questions U.S. expansion

Refiners aren’t exactly rushing to set up shop in the U.S. Christoph Wild, president of the Swiss Association of Precious Metals Producers and Traders, said the current system—where gold from the U.K. flows through Switzerland before hitting U.S. markets—is inefficient. He said that could be fixed by building up refining capacity in the U.S., though that only makes sense if there’s enough local demand. “All our refinery members have mid-term to long-term plans to further invest in the U.S.,” Wild said. But he added he didn’t know “if it’s possible to run that business in an economical way without having some subsidies from the Swiss government or the U.S. government.”

Someone close to the talks confirmed that at least one Swiss refiner is already looking to speed up investment in the U.S. Meanwhile, others are warning that forcing this industry to pay taxes or relocate could destroy it. Wild said, “Nobody would pay a premium of even 1% for gold when you could buy it at the market price.” A levy would wipe out profits and kill the trade overnight.

For Simone Knobloch, Chief Operating Officer at Valcambi SA, the numbers don’t add up. The company, which refines up to 2,000 tons of metals annually in Balerna, right next to Italy, has no footprint in the U.S. and no plans to build one. “If I look at the business case, it doesn’t make sense,” Knobloch said. The U.S. market is already crowded, and the margins are too low to justify expansion. Still, with Trump sitting in the White House again and pressure rising on Swiss politicians, the gold industry might not get to choose what makes sense anymore.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.001039
$0.001039$0.001039
-4.94%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin

SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin

The post SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SoFi Technologies has selected BitGo Bank & Trust
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/06 01:50
The reality of today

The reality of today

It may take a long time to process and to reach the point of awakening. Then we discover what is important in life — the value of creating, giving, and contributing
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/06 00:02
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00