The post Why Messi’s 2025 MLS Season Is Better Than Vela’s Record 2019 Campaign appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Lionel Messi #10 of Inter Miami celebrates after a goal scored during the first half of the match against Nashville SC on Saturday. Getty Images While Lionel Messi ended up comfortably winning the MLS Golden Boot, completing a hat trick on Saturday night to finish on 29 goals, officially he fell five goals and one goal contribution shy of matching Carlos Vela’s historic 2019 campaign. Vela had an MLS record 34 goals and 49 goal contributions (goals plus assists) for LAFC that season, in what will still be officially recognized officially as the most productive season by an MLS attacker in the league’s 30-year history. But a closer look at the numbers suggests what Messi accomplished in 2025 was more impressive and should be considered the greatest attacking season in MLS history. Here are three reasons why: Padded With Penalties You’ll find varying opinions on how much credit players should receive for scoring penalty kicks. There’s no denying that converting penalties is a skill. That said, the statistics across that game show that penalties are converted about 77% of the time, a far greater rate than any other kind of regular chance. And often the player taking the penalty has little to do with earning it. And if you believe penalties artificially pad goal-scoring stats, then the only conclusion is that Messi had the better season, since only one of his 29 goals came from the spot. In fact, his 28 non-penalty goals are the most ever scored by an MLS player. Most non-penalty MLS goals, single season 1. Lionel Messi: 28 (2025)T2. Carlos Vela: 25 (2019)T2. Mamadou Diallo: 25 (2000)T2. Stern John: 25 (1998)T5. Zlatan Ibrahimovic: 24 (2019)T5. Bradley Wright-Phillips: 24 (2016)T5. Roy Lassiter: 24 (1996) Previously Vela’s 25 non-penalty goals in 2019 only put him in a three-way… The post Why Messi’s 2025 MLS Season Is Better Than Vela’s Record 2019 Campaign appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Lionel Messi #10 of Inter Miami celebrates after a goal scored during the first half of the match against Nashville SC on Saturday. Getty Images While Lionel Messi ended up comfortably winning the MLS Golden Boot, completing a hat trick on Saturday night to finish on 29 goals, officially he fell five goals and one goal contribution shy of matching Carlos Vela’s historic 2019 campaign. Vela had an MLS record 34 goals and 49 goal contributions (goals plus assists) for LAFC that season, in what will still be officially recognized officially as the most productive season by an MLS attacker in the league’s 30-year history. But a closer look at the numbers suggests what Messi accomplished in 2025 was more impressive and should be considered the greatest attacking season in MLS history. Here are three reasons why: Padded With Penalties You’ll find varying opinions on how much credit players should receive for scoring penalty kicks. There’s no denying that converting penalties is a skill. That said, the statistics across that game show that penalties are converted about 77% of the time, a far greater rate than any other kind of regular chance. And often the player taking the penalty has little to do with earning it. And if you believe penalties artificially pad goal-scoring stats, then the only conclusion is that Messi had the better season, since only one of his 29 goals came from the spot. In fact, his 28 non-penalty goals are the most ever scored by an MLS player. Most non-penalty MLS goals, single season 1. Lionel Messi: 28 (2025)T2. Carlos Vela: 25 (2019)T2. Mamadou Diallo: 25 (2000)T2. Stern John: 25 (1998)T5. Zlatan Ibrahimovic: 24 (2019)T5. Bradley Wright-Phillips: 24 (2016)T5. Roy Lassiter: 24 (1996) Previously Vela’s 25 non-penalty goals in 2019 only put him in a three-way…

Why Messi’s 2025 MLS Season Is Better Than Vela’s Record 2019 Campaign

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Lionel Messi #10 of Inter Miami celebrates after a goal scored during the first half of the match against Nashville SC on Saturday.

Getty Images

While Lionel Messi ended up comfortably winning the MLS Golden Boot, completing a hat trick on Saturday night to finish on 29 goals, officially he fell five goals and one goal contribution shy of matching Carlos Vela’s historic 2019 campaign.

Vela had an MLS record 34 goals and 49 goal contributions (goals plus assists) for LAFC that season, in what will still be officially recognized officially as the most productive season by an MLS attacker in the league’s 30-year history.

But a closer look at the numbers suggests what Messi accomplished in 2025 was more impressive and should be considered the greatest attacking season in MLS history.

Here are three reasons why:

Padded With Penalties

You’ll find varying opinions on how much credit players should receive for scoring penalty kicks. There’s no denying that converting penalties is a skill. That said, the statistics across that game show that penalties are converted about 77% of the time, a far greater rate than any other kind of regular chance. And often the player taking the penalty has little to do with earning it.

And if you believe penalties artificially pad goal-scoring stats, then the only conclusion is that Messi had the better season, since only one of his 29 goals came from the spot. In fact, his 28 non-penalty goals are the most ever scored by an MLS player.


Most non-penalty MLS goals, single season

1. Lionel Messi: 28 (2025)
T2. Carlos Vela: 25 (2019)
T2. Mamadou Diallo: 25 (2000)
T2. Stern John: 25 (1998)
T5. Zlatan Ibrahimovic: 24 (2019)
T5. Bradley Wright-Phillips: 24 (2016)
T5. Roy Lassiter: 24 (1996)


Previously Vela’s 25 non-penalty goals in 2019 only put him in a three-way tie for league record in that category.

In terms of total non-penalty goals contributions, Messi’s 47 this season put him well clear of Vela’s 39 for the MLS record in that metric.

Secondary Assist Saga

Additionally, Messi would’ve already overtaken Vela’s goal contributions record were any league other than MLS keeping the statistics.

Both Vela’s tally of 49 goal contributions in 2019 and Messi’s total of 48 in 2025 are based on the league’s practice of crediting players with a secondary assist for the second-to-last pass leading to a goal.


Goal contributions, primary assists only

Lionel Messi, 2025: 45 (29 g, 16a)
Carlos Vela, 2019: 44 (34g, 10a)


It’s a common practice in ice hockey, including in the National Hockey League. But the overwhelming majority of other soccer leagues only count primary assists – i.e. the final pass before a goal – as an official stat.

And if you only look at stats from Messi and Vela’s historic seasons via sites like FBref.com, who record only primary assists in keeping with the global standard, then it’s Messi whose 45 goal contributions in 2025 lead Vela’s 44 goal contributions in 2018.

Difficulty, Efficiency Considerations

A third consideration is that the quality of MLS is not static, as the league continues to grow in comparison to global norms.

Exact league-to-league comparisons are impossible. But the financial data makes it clear the overall quality of MLS has risen significantly in the last six years. According to Transfermarkt, the average MLS squad value has jumped 81.3% over the past six years, a rate well above inflation over the same span.


MLS average squad values

2019: $29.36 million
2025: $53.21 million


Additionally, Messi’s MLS schedule has come against mostly Eastern Conference opponents in what statistically was one of the most difficult conferences to navigate in MLS history.

Chicago and Orlando will meet in the Eastern Conference wild card match despite earning 53 points. That haul would have been good enough for third and fourth place in the 2019 Western Conference table.

And while Messi played in nine more MLS matches in 2025 than in 2024, he still played more than 300 minutes fewer than Vela in 2019, meaning he was more efficient in his production in terms of overall contributions.


Goal contributions per 90 minutes

Messi, 2025: 1.78
Vela, 2019: 1.62


None of that will change the official record books. But it’s all strong reasons to rank Messi’s 2025 campaign as qualitatively the greatest MLS season in history.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianquillen/2025/10/19/why-messis-2025-mls-season-is-better-than-velas-record-2019-campaign/

Market Opportunity
InterMilanFanToken Logo
InterMilanFanToken Price(INTER)
$0.5172
$0.5172$0.5172
-0.76%
USD
InterMilanFanToken (INTER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment?

Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment?

The post Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 17:39 Is dogecoin really fading? As traders hunt the best crypto to buy now and weigh 2025 picks, Dogecoin (DOGE) still owns the meme coin spotlight, yet upside looks capped, today’s Dogecoin price prediction says as much. Attention is shifting to projects that blend culture with real on-chain tools. Buyers searching “best crypto to buy now” want shipped products, audits, and transparent tokenomics. That frames the true matchup: dogecoin vs. Pepeto. Enter Pepeto (PEPETO), an Ethereum-based memecoin with working rails: PepetoSwap, a zero-fee DEX, plus Pepeto Bridge for smooth cross-chain moves. By fusing story with tools people can use now, and speaking directly to crypto presale 2025 demand, Pepeto puts utility, clarity, and distribution in front. In a market where legacy meme coin leaders risk drifting on sentiment, Pepeto’s execution gives it a real seat in the “best crypto to buy now” debate. First, a quick look at why dogecoin may be losing altitude. Dogecoin Price Prediction: Is Doge Really Fading? Remember when dogecoin made crypto feel simple? In 2013, DOGE turned a meme into money and a loose forum into a movement. A decade on, the nonstop momentum has cooled; the backdrop is different, and the market is far more selective. With DOGE circling ~$0.268, the tape reads bearish-to-neutral for the next few weeks: hold the $0.26 shelf on daily closes and expect choppy range-trading toward $0.29–$0.30 where rallies keep stalling; lose $0.26 decisively and momentum often bleeds into $0.245 with risk of a deeper probe toward $0.22–$0.21; reclaim $0.30 on a clean daily close and the downside bias is likely neutralized, opening room for a squeeze into the low-$0.30s. Source: CoinMarketcap / TradingView Beyond the dogecoin price prediction, DOGE still centers on payments and lacks native smart contracts; ZK-proof verification is proposed,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:14
Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token

Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token

The post Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wormhole is changing how its W token works by creating a new reserve designed to hold value for the long term. Announced on Wednesday, the Wormhole Reserve will collect onchain and offchain revenues and other value generated across the protocol and its applications (including Portal) and accumulate them into W, locking the tokens within the reserve. The reserve is part of a broader update called W 2.0. Other changes include a 4% targeted base yield for tokenholders who stake and take part in governance. While staking rewards will vary, Wormhole said active users of ecosystem apps can earn boosted yields through features like Portal Earn. The team stressed that no new tokens are being minted; rewards come from existing supply and protocol revenues, keeping the cap fixed at 10 billion. Wormhole is also overhauling its token release schedule. Instead of releasing large amounts of W at once under the old “cliff” model, the network will shift to steady, bi-weekly unlocks starting October 3, 2025. The aim is to avoid sharp periods of selling pressure and create a more predictable environment for investors. Lockups for some groups, including validators and investors, will extend an additional six months, until October 2028. Core contributor tokens remain under longer contractual time locks. Wormhole launched in 2020 as a cross-chain bridge and now connects more than 40 blockchains. The W token powers governance and staking, with a capped supply of 10 billion. By redirecting fees and revenues into the new reserve, Wormhole is betting that its token can maintain value as demand for moving assets and data between chains grows. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/wormhole-launches-reserve
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:55
Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

The post Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto assets send conflicting signals ahead of the Federal Reserve’s September rate decision. On-chain data reveals a clear decrease in Bitcoin and Ethereum flowing into centralized exchanges, but a sharp increase in altcoin inflows. The findings come from a Tuesday report by CryptoQuant, an on-chain data platform. The firm’s data shows a stark divergence in coin volume, which has been observed in movements onto centralized exchanges over the past few weeks. Bitcoin and Ethereum Inflows Drop to Multi-Month Lows Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin has seen a dramatic drop in exchange inflows, with the 7-day moving average plummeting to 25,000 BTC, its lowest level in over a year. The average deposit per transaction has fallen to 0.57 BTC as of September. This suggests that smaller retail investors, rather than large-scale whales, are responsible for the recent cash-outs. Ethereum is showing a similar trend, with its daily exchange inflows decreasing to a two-month low. CryptoQuant reported that the 7-day moving average for ETH deposits on exchanges is around 783,000 ETH, the lowest in two months. Other Altcoins See Renewed Selling Pressure In contrast, other altcoin deposit activity on exchanges has surged. The number of altcoin deposit transactions on centralized exchanges was quite steady in May and June of this year, maintaining a 7-day moving average of about 20,000 to 30,000. Recently, however, that figure has jumped to 55,000 transactions. Altcoins: Exchange Inflow Transaction Count. Source: CryptoQuant CryptoQuant projects that altcoins, given their increased inflow activity, could face relatively higher selling pressure compared to BTC and ETH. Meanwhile, the balance of stablecoins on exchanges—a key indicator of potential buying pressure—has increased significantly. The report notes that the exchange USDT balance, around $273 million in April, grew to $379 million by August 31, marking a new yearly high. CryptoQuant interprets this surge as a reflection of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:01