The post Michael Saylor mixes up his ‘treasuries’ in misleading MSTR tweet appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) founder Michael Saylor has broadcasted many dubious claims over the years, but this week’s likening of MSTR to “digital treasuries” might take the cake. At first glance, Saylor’s tweet might mislead some into believing that he referred to MSTR as a type of treasury bond — as in a US Treasury. However, a careful review of the lengthy presentation attached to the tweet reveals that he merely meant to call Strategy — the business — a digital asset treasury (DAT). Still, the claim that MSTR is a company in the digital treasuries sector is still incredible just on the basis of dictionary definitions. Rather than an actual treasury that holds assets for a saver, Strategy holds bitcoin (BTC) that it repeatedly tells shareholders that they will never own. In numerous Security and Exchange Commission filings, including its most recent quarterly earnings report, the company emphatically tells MSTR shareholders that they don’t own Strategy’s BTC. “Ownership of our securities, including our class A common stock and preferred stock, does not represent an ownership interest in, or a redemption right with respect to, the bitcoin we hold,” it explains. This contrasts with the dictionary definition of treasury: a place in which stores of wealth are kept. No MSTR shareholder stores their BTC in Strategy’s treasury, and the BTC in Strategy’s treasury doesn’t store MSTR shareholders’ wealth. For months, the company has published variations of that disclaimer to clarify that MSTR isn’t a BTC treasury — by the company’s own admission — except in name only. MSTR: Not a treasury, not amplifying BTC recently During the same presentation, Saylor also called MSTR “amplified BTC.” That claim is equally incredible, albeit also vague enough to avoid the scrutiny of his first claim that MSTR is digital treasuries. Although it’s true that… The post Michael Saylor mixes up his ‘treasuries’ in misleading MSTR tweet appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) founder Michael Saylor has broadcasted many dubious claims over the years, but this week’s likening of MSTR to “digital treasuries” might take the cake. At first glance, Saylor’s tweet might mislead some into believing that he referred to MSTR as a type of treasury bond — as in a US Treasury. However, a careful review of the lengthy presentation attached to the tweet reveals that he merely meant to call Strategy — the business — a digital asset treasury (DAT). Still, the claim that MSTR is a company in the digital treasuries sector is still incredible just on the basis of dictionary definitions. Rather than an actual treasury that holds assets for a saver, Strategy holds bitcoin (BTC) that it repeatedly tells shareholders that they will never own. In numerous Security and Exchange Commission filings, including its most recent quarterly earnings report, the company emphatically tells MSTR shareholders that they don’t own Strategy’s BTC. “Ownership of our securities, including our class A common stock and preferred stock, does not represent an ownership interest in, or a redemption right with respect to, the bitcoin we hold,” it explains. This contrasts with the dictionary definition of treasury: a place in which stores of wealth are kept. No MSTR shareholder stores their BTC in Strategy’s treasury, and the BTC in Strategy’s treasury doesn’t store MSTR shareholders’ wealth. For months, the company has published variations of that disclaimer to clarify that MSTR isn’t a BTC treasury — by the company’s own admission — except in name only. MSTR: Not a treasury, not amplifying BTC recently During the same presentation, Saylor also called MSTR “amplified BTC.” That claim is equally incredible, albeit also vague enough to avoid the scrutiny of his first claim that MSTR is digital treasuries. Although it’s true that…

Michael Saylor mixes up his ‘treasuries’ in misleading MSTR tweet

Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) founder Michael Saylor has broadcasted many dubious claims over the years, but this week’s likening of MSTR to “digital treasuries” might take the cake.

At first glance, Saylor’s tweet might mislead some into believing that he referred to MSTR as a type of treasury bond — as in a US Treasury.

However, a careful review of the lengthy presentation attached to the tweet reveals that he merely meant to call Strategy — the business — a digital asset treasury (DAT).

Still, the claim that MSTR is a company in the digital treasuries sector is still incredible just on the basis of dictionary definitions.

Rather than an actual treasury that holds assets for a saver, Strategy holds bitcoin (BTC) that it repeatedly tells shareholders that they will never own.

In numerous Security and Exchange Commission filings, including its most recent quarterly earnings report, the company emphatically tells MSTR shareholders that they don’t own Strategy’s BTC.

“Ownership of our securities, including our class A common stock and preferred stock, does not represent an ownership interest in, or a redemption right with respect to, the bitcoin we hold,” it explains.

This contrasts with the dictionary definition of treasury: a place in which stores of wealth are kept. No MSTR shareholder stores their BTC in Strategy’s treasury, and the BTC in Strategy’s treasury doesn’t store MSTR shareholders’ wealth.

For months, the company has published variations of that disclaimer to clarify that MSTR isn’t a BTC treasury — by the company’s own admission — except in name only.

MSTR: Not a treasury, not amplifying BTC recently

During the same presentation, Saylor also called MSTR “amplified BTC.”

That claim is equally incredible, albeit also vague enough to avoid the scrutiny of his first claim that MSTR is digital treasuries.

Although it’s true that the enterprise value of MSTR exceeds the value of the BTC that it holds by 21%, its multiple-to-Net Asset Value (mNAV) of 1.21x has been declining for over a year.

Read more: How Jim Chanos outplayed Michael Saylor: short MSTR, long BTC

Rather than amplifying the returns of BTC, any MSTR holder has lost money versus simply holding BTC since February 2024. Only over much longer timeframes has MSTR outperformed BTC.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/michael-saylor-mixes-up-his-treasuries-in-misleading-mstr-tweet/

Market Opportunity
Overtake Logo
Overtake Price(TAKE)
$0.02506
$0.02506$0.02506
+0.80%
USD
Overtake (TAKE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Missouri Considers Bitcoin Reserve Fund using Donations

Missouri Considers Bitcoin Reserve Fund using Donations

The post Missouri Considers Bitcoin Reserve Fund using Donations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Missouri legislators have taken a significant step by introducing
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/21 14:17
Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Metaplanet Inc., the Japanese public company known for its bitcoin treasury, is launching a Miami subsidiary to run a dedicated derivatives and income strategy aimed at turning holdings into steady, U.S.-based cash flow. Japanese Bitcoin Treasury Player Metaplanet Opens Miami Outpost The new entity, Metaplanet Income Corp., sits under Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. and is based […]
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:32
FCA, crackdown on crypto

FCA, crackdown on crypto

The post FCA, crackdown on crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United Kingdom enters a decisive phase. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated a consultation to set minimum standards on transparency, consumer protection, and digital custody, in order to strengthen market confidence and ensure safer operations for exchanges, wallets, and crypto service providers. The consultation was published on May 2, 2025, and opened a public discussion on operational responsibilities and safeguarding requirements for digital assets (CoinDesk). The goal is to make the rules clearer without hindering the sector’s evolution. According to the data collected by our regulatory monitoring team, in the first weeks following the publication, the feedback received from professionals and operators focused mainly on custody, incident reporting, and insurance requirements. Industry analysts note that many responses require technical clarifications on multi-sig, asset segregation, and recovery protocols, as well as proposals to scale obligations based on the size of the operator. FCA Consultation: What’s on the Table The consultation document clarifies how to apply rules inspired by traditional finance to the crypto perimeter, balancing innovation, market integrity, and user protection. In this context, the goal is to introduce minimum standards for all firms under the supervision of the FCA, an essential step for a more transparent and secure sector, with measurable benefits for users. The proposed pillars Obligations towards consumers: assessment on the extension of the Consumer Duty – a requirement that mandates companies to provide “good outcomes” – to crypto services, with outcomes for users that are traceable and verifiable. Operational resilience: introduction of continuity requirements, incident response plans, and periodic testing to ensure the operational stability of platforms even in adverse scenarios. Financial Crime Prevention: strengthening AML/CFT measures through more stringent transaction monitoring and structured counterpart checks. Custody and safeguarding: definition of operational methods for the segregation of client assets, secure…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:40