The post Putin Claims US Russia Talks on Zaporizhzhia Mining appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Russia and the United States have discussed the possibility ofThe post Putin Claims US Russia Talks on Zaporizhzhia Mining appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Russia and the United States have discussed the possibility of

Putin Claims US Russia Talks on Zaporizhzhia Mining

Russia and the United States have discussed the possibility of jointly managing the Russian-controlled Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, including using its electricity for Bitcoin mining, Russian President Vladimir Putin said, according to remarks cited by Kommersant and reposted by KyivPost. The talks did not include Ukraine, Putin added, even though the plant remains on Ukrainian territory under international law.

Putin said U.S. representatives showed interest in directing excess electricity from the facility toward cryptocurrency mining operations. At the same time, he claimed Washington also raised the idea of supplying electricity from the plant to Ukraine. Kyiv has not confirmed any such discussions and has repeatedly opposed arrangements that bypass Ukrainian authorities.

The Zaporizhzhia facility, Europe’s largest nuclear power plant, has been under Russian control since March 2022. Its status remains one of the most sensitive issues in the war, touching on energy security, nuclear safety, and sovereignty.

Control Talks Sideline Ukraine

According to Putin, discussions with the United States focused on “joint management” of the plant without Ukraine’s involvement. He said Ukrainian technical staff continue to work at the facility but now hold Russian passports, a claim Ukrainian officials have previously rejected as illegitimate.

Ukrainian authorities have instead promoted alternative frameworks. In recent comments reported by RBC Ukraine, Kyiv proposed a model of joint operation that would involve Ukraine and international partners, not bilateral talks between Moscow and Washington. Ukrainian officials argue that any governance arrangement must restore Ukrainian control and ensure demilitarization of the site.

The International Atomic Energy Agency has maintained a presence at Zaporizhzhia and continues to warn about safety risks linked to military activity near the plant. Power disruptions and reliance on backup systems have kept the facility in a fragile operating state.

Energy Crisis and Crypto Angle

The comments come as Ukraine enters winter with a strained power grid. A recent report by The Wall Street Journal described ongoing attacks on energy infrastructure that have forced rolling outages across the country, increasing pressure to secure stable electricity supplies.

Against that backdrop, the idea of using nuclear-generated power for crypto mining adds a new dimension to the dispute. Bitcoin mining requires large, steady energy inputs, and nuclear plants provide consistent baseload power. However, critics argue that raising crypto mining in talks about a war-zone nuclear facility highlights how far negotiations have drifted from Ukraine’s priorities.

Kyiv has said it will not recognize any agreements over Zaporizhzhia made without its consent. For now, claims of U.S. interest in crypto mining remain unconfirmed by Washington, while the plant’s future stays tied to broader negotiations over territory and security.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/13398/russia-us-discuss-crypto-mining-at-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-plant-without-kyiv-putin-says

Market Opportunity
Talus Logo
Talus Price(US)
$0.00352
$0.00352$0.00352
+0.28%
USD
Talus (US) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Surge With Stocks, But Analyst Warns This Might Just Be A 'Relief Rally'

Leading cryptocurrencies jumped on Wednesday, though analysts view the uptick as a relief bounce rather than a momentum shift.read more
Share
Coinstats2026/02/26 10:04
The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

The Chen Zhi case and the Zhao Changpeng case: The United States profited nearly $20 billion from them.

Author: Yuan Hong , Global Times On February 26, a new report jointly released by the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center of China and other departments
Share
PANews2026/02/26 11:18