Crypto VC funding slips to $864M in Feb 2026, down 19.3%

February 2026 crypto fundraising: $864M claim vs $883M

A widely circulated claim puts February 2026 crypto fundraising at $864 million with a 19.3% month‑on‑month decline. That exact combination is not corroborated by major public datasets.

As reported by Phemex News, crypto startups raised $883 million in February 2026, with funding down roughly 13% year‑on‑year (https://phemex.com/news/article/crypto-startups-secure-883-million-in-february-2026-down-13-yoy-63240). The $864 million figure may reflect a narrower scope, different deal cut‑offs, or a subset of rounds.

Why crypto venture capital funding totals differ by source

Crypto funding tallies vary because providers bucket deals differently. Some track only equity rounds; others include token sales, grants, or undisclosed bridge financings.

Geographic coverage and stage labeling also diverge. A late‑announced January round can slip into February for one dataset, and seed extensions may be counted as separate deals elsewhere.

Sector mix matters for comparability. As reported by Incrypted, capital concentrated in real‑world assets, stablecoin infrastructure, and centralized finance rails, with Tether appearing among notable participants (https://incrypted.com/en/follow-the-money-over-460m-in-ventures-tether-s-participation-and-cefi-in-focus/). That tilt can influence month‑to‑month optics if mega‑rounds bunch in a theme.

Institutional flows can tighten or loosen venture conditions by affecting liquidity and risk appetite. When ETF inflows soften, private market pacing often follows with smaller, more selective rounds.

At the time of this writing, Ethereum (ETH) traded near $1,871 with very high short‑term volatility, based on provided metrics. This market backdrop is context, not a funding driver by itself.

Methodology and dataset reconciliation for fundraising totals

Coverage definitions: equity vs token sales, regions, and stages

Reconciling $864 million versus $883 million requires aligning inclusion rules. Confirm whether token issuances, grants, and secondary token purchases are counted alongside equity.

Check regional treatment and whether venture debt, SAFEs, and undisclosed rounds are included. Align the closing date convention and verify if mega‑rounds were revised post‑announcement.

Signals from Coinbase Institutional, DWF Labs, and Tether

Two concurrent signals frame February’s environment: more selective underwriting and cautious institutional liquidity. These conditions help explain smaller round sizes and dispersion across infrastructure and RWA.

“VCs are being more selective, focusing on revenue, sustainability, and infrastructure,” said a partner at DWF Labs. This stance aligns with a shift toward quality over momentum.

“Spot ETF flows saw net outflows and market depth weakened in February,” according to Coinbase Institutional research (https://www.coinbase.com/institutional). Such dynamics can translate into slower deployment and stricter round terms.

FAQ about February 2026 crypto fundraising

Is the reported $864M figure accurate, and how does it compare with the $883M figure from other sources?

The $864M number lacks clear sourcing. Phemex News reports $883M for February 2026. Differences likely reflect coverage scope, timing cut‑offs, and treatment of token sales.

How did February 2026 funding change month-on-month and year-on-year?

MoM change depends on dataset; the 19.3% drop is tied to the $864M claim. YoY decline is about 13% based on the $883M dataset.