The post Why Bitcoin ETFs started to bleed out as four-day outflows hit $1.34B appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Spot Bitcoin ETFs opened the week with -$186.5 million in net redemptions on Monday, Nov. 3, stretching a four-session drain to roughly -$1.34 billion since Oct. 29. This run shows how quickly flows can swing when a single mega-issuer turns into a seller. Data from Farside shows Monday’s outflows were effectively concentrated at IBIT, with peers essentially flat, following last week’s sequence of -$470.7 million (Oct. 29), -$488.4 million (Oct. 30), and -$191.6 million (Oct. 31). Table showing spot Bitcoin ETF flows from Oct. 16 to Nov. 2, 2025 (Source: Farside) The issuer split matters: on Friday, GBTC actually posted a small +$6.9 million inflow even as the group bled, highlighting dispersion beneath the aggregate headline. One of the main takeaways from this distribution of outflows isn’t their size, but their composition and pace, both of which help explain why the daily totals can look volatile without necessarily signaling a broad investor exit from spot BTC exposure. Weekly data from CoinShares shows digital asset ETPs saw net outflows of ~$360 million in the most recent week, with Bitcoin products bearing the brunt at -$946 million, while Solana funds drew ~$421 million of inflows, the second-largest on record, helped by the launch of new US SOL ETFs. In other words, it appears that investor appetite shifted to other ETPs. The same report links the week’s bias to the market’s hawkish read of Chair Powell’s comments following a recent rate cut, an interpretation that kept risk markets cautious and left flows skittish at the margin. Taken together, the cross-asset split (BTC out / SOL in) and the policy narrative suggest a repositioning, rather than a wholesale abandonment, of crypto ETPs. When analyzing ETF flows, it is essential to remember that flows don’t equal price, and daily prints don’t always reflect trends. Spot… The post Why Bitcoin ETFs started to bleed out as four-day outflows hit $1.34B appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Spot Bitcoin ETFs opened the week with -$186.5 million in net redemptions on Monday, Nov. 3, stretching a four-session drain to roughly -$1.34 billion since Oct. 29. This run shows how quickly flows can swing when a single mega-issuer turns into a seller. Data from Farside shows Monday’s outflows were effectively concentrated at IBIT, with peers essentially flat, following last week’s sequence of -$470.7 million (Oct. 29), -$488.4 million (Oct. 30), and -$191.6 million (Oct. 31). Table showing spot Bitcoin ETF flows from Oct. 16 to Nov. 2, 2025 (Source: Farside) The issuer split matters: on Friday, GBTC actually posted a small +$6.9 million inflow even as the group bled, highlighting dispersion beneath the aggregate headline. One of the main takeaways from this distribution of outflows isn’t their size, but their composition and pace, both of which help explain why the daily totals can look volatile without necessarily signaling a broad investor exit from spot BTC exposure. Weekly data from CoinShares shows digital asset ETPs saw net outflows of ~$360 million in the most recent week, with Bitcoin products bearing the brunt at -$946 million, while Solana funds drew ~$421 million of inflows, the second-largest on record, helped by the launch of new US SOL ETFs. In other words, it appears that investor appetite shifted to other ETPs. The same report links the week’s bias to the market’s hawkish read of Chair Powell’s comments following a recent rate cut, an interpretation that kept risk markets cautious and left flows skittish at the margin. Taken together, the cross-asset split (BTC out / SOL in) and the policy narrative suggest a repositioning, rather than a wholesale abandonment, of crypto ETPs. When analyzing ETF flows, it is essential to remember that flows don’t equal price, and daily prints don’t always reflect trends. Spot…

Why Bitcoin ETFs started to bleed out as four-day outflows hit $1.34B

2025/11/05 00:04

Spot Bitcoin ETFs opened the week with -$186.5 million in net redemptions on Monday, Nov. 3, stretching a four-session drain to roughly -$1.34 billion since Oct. 29. This run shows how quickly flows can swing when a single mega-issuer turns into a seller.

Data from Farside shows Monday’s outflows were effectively concentrated at IBIT, with peers essentially flat, following last week’s sequence of -$470.7 million (Oct. 29), -$488.4 million (Oct. 30), and -$191.6 million (Oct. 31).

Table showing spot Bitcoin ETF flows from Oct. 16 to Nov. 2, 2025 (Source: Farside)

The issuer split matters: on Friday, GBTC actually posted a small +$6.9 million inflow even as the group bled, highlighting dispersion beneath the aggregate headline. One of the main takeaways from this distribution of outflows isn’t their size, but their composition and pace, both of which help explain why the daily totals can look volatile without necessarily signaling a broad investor exit from spot BTC exposure.

Weekly data from CoinShares shows digital asset ETPs saw net outflows of ~$360 million in the most recent week, with Bitcoin products bearing the brunt at -$946 million, while Solana funds drew ~$421 million of inflows, the second-largest on record, helped by the launch of new US SOL ETFs. In other words, it appears that investor appetite shifted to other ETPs.

The same report links the week’s bias to the market’s hawkish read of Chair Powell’s comments following a recent rate cut, an interpretation that kept risk markets cautious and left flows skittish at the margin. Taken together, the cross-asset split (BTC out / SOL in) and the policy narrative suggest a repositioning, rather than a wholesale abandonment, of crypto ETPs.

When analyzing ETF flows, it is essential to remember that flows don’t equal price, and daily prints don’t always reflect trends. Spot Bitcoin ETF flows are comprised of net creations and redemptions reported by issuers and compiled by independent trackers, such as Farside. They’re certainly among the cleanest real-time signals of US demand for wrapped BTC exposure, but they can also be distorted by issuer-specific activities like AP inventory management, creation basket timing, or even a single fund’s model-driven rebalancing.

That’s why Monday’s IBIT outflows can move the total even when others are flat. And because updates are typically released in the evenings US time, the flow data can lag or bunch, creating streaks that could be a result of reporting cadence rather than sentiment change.

That’s why looking at multi-day sums and issuer dispersion is the more reliable tell of trends in the ETF market.

The approximately $1.34 billion outflow we’ve seen over the past four trading days is undoubtedly substantial. However, it follows months of historically large two-way prints and sits alongside large inflows into non-BTC segments, such as Solana ETFs. Looking through the macro lens, this pattern resembles tactical de-risking into policy and price uncertainty rather than large structural outflows.

In the coming days and weeks, the market will be watching to see whether IBIT’s selling pressure persists or shifts to other issuers. An important development will also be whether the SOL inflow streak fades as the new product settles. Any break in the daily outflow streak will also signal stabilization.

If flows stabilize or turn green while Bitcoin maintains support at $110,000, we can safely say that last week’s outflow streak was positioning noise rather than a turn in demand. However, another week of $1 billion or more in outflows, concentrated in one or two issuers, would indicate that large allocators are actively reducing risk in their flagship funds. Either way, the current story is dispersion and rotation, with no certain capitulation yet.

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/btc-etfs-start-to-bleed-out-as-four-day-outflows-hit-1-34b/

Piyasa Fırsatı
WHY Logosu
WHY Fiyatı(WHY)
$0,00000001529
$0,00000001529$0,00000001529
-%11,46
USD
WHY (WHY) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
PA Daily | Moonshot launches New XAI gork ($gork); analysis shows that Trump’s crypto assets account for about 40% of his total assets

PA Daily | Moonshot launches New XAI gork ($gork); analysis shows that Trump’s crypto assets account for about 40% of his total assets

CryptoQuant predicts three future trend scenarios for Bitcoin: in an optimistic scenario, it will rise to $150,000 to $175,000; Binance Alpha will launch Anon, BEETS and SHADOW; Moonshot announced the launch of New XAI gork ($gork).
Paylaş
PANews2025/05/01 17:30
XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

De markt voor crypto-exchange-traded funds (ETF’s) heeft opnieuw een belangrijke mijlpaal bereikt. XRP ETF’s hebben gezamenlijk meer dan 1 miljard dollar aan netto
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/12/16 21:01