In the past month, the old public chain Injective has returned to the public eye again with the second-highest net inflow of funds. According to Artemis data, Injective has a net inflow of about 142 million US dollars in the past 30 days, only lower than Ethereum.In the past month, the old public chain Injective has returned to the public eye again with the second-highest net inflow of funds. According to Artemis data, Injective has a net inflow of about 142 million US dollars in the past 30 days, only lower than Ethereum.

Behind Injective’s soaring data, is it a flash in the pan or a comeback?

2025/06/04 16:18

Author: Frank, PANews

In the past month, the old public chain Injective has returned to the public eye again with the second-highest net inflow of funds. According to Artemis data, Injective has a net inflow of about 142 million US dollars in the past 30 days, only lower than Ethereum.

PANews also observed other data of Injective and found that this phenomenon of net capital inflow is not a single case. There have been significant increases in on-chain fees, active users, token trading volume, etc. After a long period of silence, will this former public chain rising star Injective usher in another ecological explosion? Or is it just a short-lived flash in the pan?

With a monthly inflow of US$142 million, are high returns "honey" or "flares"?

Data as of June 4 shows that Injective has achieved a net inflow of $142 million in the past month. Although the amount is not high, it still ranks second among all public chains in recent data. A closer look at the data shows that the obvious reason for this net inflow is that Injective has indeed ushered in a wave of rapid and large capital inflows on the one hand, and on the other hand, the net outflow of funds is very small, only $11 million. Therefore, if we look into the reasons, Injective's high ranking in net inflow this time is not because its overall capital flow is abnormally active (that is, there are large-scale capital inflows and outflows at the same time). In fact, its pure capital inflow is only ranked around tenth in a horizontal comparison with other public chains. The key to its outstanding performance in the "net inflow" indicator is that the capital outflow during the same period is negligible.

Behind Injective’s soaring data, is it a flash in the pan or a comeback?

However, this kind of abnormal movement of funds on the chain is also rare for the Injective network. Of the 142 million inflows, 140 million was completed through the peggy cross-chain bridge, accounting for 98.5% of the share. Market analysis agency Keyrock pointed out in its report "Key Insights, Bond Appetit" released on May 26 that this large-scale inflow of funds was mainly attributed to the launch of the institutional-level yield platform Upshift on Injective. It is understood that Upshift's vault APY on Injective has reached 30%, and this high yield may indeed be an important reason for attracting funds to transfer assets to Injective.

Behind Injective’s soaring data, is it a flash in the pan or a comeback?

However, PANews found through investigation that the hard cap of the vault established by Upshift at Injective is US$5 million, which cannot fully accommodate the inflow of this part of funds. Those funds that failed to participate in this vault investment may be lost again in the short term.

From the failure of derivatives to the hope of RWA, can Injective create a new situation?

In addition to the inflow of funds, Injective has also recently ushered in some important changes in the ecosystem. On April 22, the Lyora mainnet was officially launched. This upgrade is an important milestone in the development of Injective. After this mainnet upgrade, technical optimizations such as dynamic fee structure and smart memory pool were introduced. According to official information, after the upgrade, Injective is described as "faster" and claims to have lower latency and higher throughput.

In addition, Injective has also launched iAssets, an oracle framework specifically for RWA. Upshift’s vault is an RWA DeFi vault. On May 29, Injective officially announced the launch of the on-chain foreign exchange market for the euro and the pound, using the iAsset framework. From this perspective, Injective’s new narrative seems inseparable from RWA.

As an old public chain, the original core narrative of Injective was a decentralized derivatives exchange. The original Injective also evolved from a decentralized derivatives exchange to a public chain, and this route seems to be exactly the same as that of Hyperliquid, which is in the limelight today.

However, Injective's current derivatives trading seems to have failed to achieve the expected goals. Data from June 4 showed that the BTC contract pair with the highest trading volume on Injective within 24 hours had a trading volume of approximately US$39.75 million, and the total derivatives trading volume of the entire chain was approximately US$90 million. In comparison, Hyperliquid's data for the same day was approximately US$7 billion, a difference of approximately 77 times.

Perhaps because it was difficult to open up the market in crypto derivatives, Injective chose to turn to the direction of RWA integration. From the perspective of the development of the ecosystem itself, this transformation seems to have a certain effect. On May 22, Injective's derivatives transactions reached a peak of US$1.97 billion, significantly higher than other times, and have shown an overall upward trend in the near future.

Behind Injective’s soaring data, is it a flash in the pan or a comeback?

In addition, in terms of daily active users, the number of addresses has surged from the lowest of 6,300 in February to 47,900 recently, an increase of about 7.6 times. Although this data ranks only 12th among all public chains, considering the rapid growth in the short term and surpassing public chains such as Avalanche and Berachain, it is also a relatively obvious breakthrough.

Behind Injective’s soaring data, is it a flash in the pan or a comeback?

Behind Injective’s soaring data, is it a flash in the pan or a comeback?

However, even though the daily activity has increased significantly, the TVL of Injective has not changed significantly. It has been declining since March 2024, and the current TVL is only 26.33 million US dollars. At least for now, the DeFi projects on Injective are still not very attractive to funds.

The token's performance rebounded significantly in the short term, but it is still 4 times away from its historical high

In terms of economy, the market value of its governance token INJ is currently about $1.26 billion, ranking 82nd. Compared with the highest market value of $5.3 billion, it has fallen by 76%. However, it has rebounded from the lowest point of $6.34 in April to $15.48, an increase of 144%. This data is also relatively impressive among the old public chains. However, it is still unknown how long this performance can be sustained. Behind Injective’s soaring data, is it a flash in the pan or a comeback?

Of course, Injective's recent actions are not limited to the above. For example, it has recently attracted many well-known institutions such as Republic, Google Cloud, and Deutsche Telekom MMS to join the ranks of validators, and launched some AI-related products and dynamics. Overall, Injective has been actively seizing new narratives such as AI and RWA to transform in the past year. According to the data as of June, it has indeed achieved some growth in recent months. However, in terms of order of magnitude, it is still far behind the current mainstream public chains.

Injective is not the only one catching up. Several star public chains in the last round are now facing similar dilemmas. Many of them have returned to the public eye by changing their names and upgrading their brands. However, can this model of putting old wine in new bottles really give the market a new taste, or can it only stay in a brand new packaging?

At present, Injective's ecological transformation and revival are still in their infancy. The capital inflow triggered by Upshift is more like an important market sentiment test and ecological potential demonstration, rather than a fundamental reversal of the pattern. Whether its strategic inclination towards RWA can truly open up a differentiated competitive advantage and transform into sustained ecological prosperity and value capture still needs to overcome many challenges and be subject to long-term market testing.

Only time will tell whether the short-term data rebound is a flash in the pan or a positive signal in the long journey of recovery. For Injective, the real test has just begun.

Piyasa Fırsatı
MetaDOS Logosu
MetaDOS Fiyatı(SECOND)
$0.0000038
$0.0000038$0.0000038
0.00%
USD
MetaDOS (SECOND) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative

South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative

The post South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea has witnessed a pivotal development in its cryptocurrency landscape with BDACS introducing the nation’s first won-backed stablecoin, KRW1, built on the Avalanche network. This stablecoin is anchored by won assets stored at Woori Bank in a 1:1 ratio, ensuring high security. Continue Reading:South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/south-korea-launches-innovative-stablecoin-initiative
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 17:54
Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

The US pauses a $41B UK tech and AI deal as trade talks stall, with disputes over food standards, market access, and rules abroad.   The US has frozen a major tech
Paylaş
LiveBitcoinNews2025/12/17 01:00
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Paylaş
Medium2025/09/18 14:40