The post Solana news: Why VCI Global’s OOB Deal Didn’t Stop a 99.9% YTD Rout appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights Solana news: VCI Global stock is down 99.9% YTD, including a 31% drop in four weeks. OOB deal largely non-cash: 98.4% of tokens came from share transfers; Tether got 39.8% of PIPE shares. Regulatory and listing risks: Missing 13D concerns and reliance on Kraken keeping OOB listed. Solana news rarely moves the needle for traditional equities, but VCI Global’s high-profile plunge into the Oobit ecosystem, backed by Tether and Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko, made headlines when the company committed $100 million to OOB tokens on November 11, 2025. However, its Nasdaq-listed shares collapsed another 10.38% that week to $1.17, capping a staggering 99.9% year-to-date decline from an adjusted $1,440 opening price. The deal, detailed in an SEC filing the same day, handed Tether 39.8% of a PIPE issuance and named VCI Global treasury manager for the OOB Foundation, yet the market punished the stock relentlessly. The volume spiked to 5.7 million shares on December 4, triple the 30-day average, and market cap shrinking to just $7.66 million. Despite Solana’s blistering network growth, TVL up 20% to $10 billion in November per DefiLlama, and Oobit’s promise of tap-to-pay USDT at 100 million merchants, the marriage of Solana news and public-company exposure delivered a brutal reminder that crypto tailwinds don’t automatically lift every boat. The Deal That Sparked Solana News — And a Stock Rout VCI Global closed the first $50 million tranche on November 11, acquiring 250 million OOB tokens at $0.20 each via restricted shares. A second $50 million cash purchase followed Oobit’s November 12 listings on Kraken and KCEX. Tether, already the world’s largest stablecoin issuer with $183 billion in circulation, became VCI Global’s biggest shareholder overnight. Oobit itself had migrated to Solana weeks earlier for sub-second settlements, leveraging the chain’s 65,000 TPS capacity audited by OtterSec… The post Solana news: Why VCI Global’s OOB Deal Didn’t Stop a 99.9% YTD Rout appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights Solana news: VCI Global stock is down 99.9% YTD, including a 31% drop in four weeks. OOB deal largely non-cash: 98.4% of tokens came from share transfers; Tether got 39.8% of PIPE shares. Regulatory and listing risks: Missing 13D concerns and reliance on Kraken keeping OOB listed. Solana news rarely moves the needle for traditional equities, but VCI Global’s high-profile plunge into the Oobit ecosystem, backed by Tether and Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko, made headlines when the company committed $100 million to OOB tokens on November 11, 2025. However, its Nasdaq-listed shares collapsed another 10.38% that week to $1.17, capping a staggering 99.9% year-to-date decline from an adjusted $1,440 opening price. The deal, detailed in an SEC filing the same day, handed Tether 39.8% of a PIPE issuance and named VCI Global treasury manager for the OOB Foundation, yet the market punished the stock relentlessly. The volume spiked to 5.7 million shares on December 4, triple the 30-day average, and market cap shrinking to just $7.66 million. Despite Solana’s blistering network growth, TVL up 20% to $10 billion in November per DefiLlama, and Oobit’s promise of tap-to-pay USDT at 100 million merchants, the marriage of Solana news and public-company exposure delivered a brutal reminder that crypto tailwinds don’t automatically lift every boat. The Deal That Sparked Solana News — And a Stock Rout VCI Global closed the first $50 million tranche on November 11, acquiring 250 million OOB tokens at $0.20 each via restricted shares. A second $50 million cash purchase followed Oobit’s November 12 listings on Kraken and KCEX. Tether, already the world’s largest stablecoin issuer with $183 billion in circulation, became VCI Global’s biggest shareholder overnight. Oobit itself had migrated to Solana weeks earlier for sub-second settlements, leveraging the chain’s 65,000 TPS capacity audited by OtterSec…

Solana news: Why VCI Global’s OOB Deal Didn’t Stop a 99.9% YTD Rout

2025/12/06 07:30
Okuma süresi: 4 dk

Key Insights

  • Solana news: VCI Global stock is down 99.9% YTD, including a 31% drop in four weeks.
  • OOB deal largely non-cash: 98.4% of tokens came from share transfers; Tether got 39.8% of PIPE shares.
  • Regulatory and listing risks: Missing 13D concerns and reliance on Kraken keeping OOB listed.

Solana news rarely moves the needle for traditional equities, but VCI Global’s high-profile plunge into the Oobit ecosystem, backed by Tether and Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko, made headlines when the company committed $100 million to OOB tokens on November 11, 2025.

However, its Nasdaq-listed shares collapsed another 10.38% that week to $1.17, capping a staggering 99.9% year-to-date decline from an adjusted $1,440 opening price.

The deal, detailed in an SEC filing the same day, handed Tether 39.8% of a PIPE issuance and named VCI Global treasury manager for the OOB Foundation, yet the market punished the stock relentlessly.

The volume spiked to 5.7 million shares on December 4, triple the 30-day average, and market cap shrinking to just $7.66 million.

Despite Solana’s blistering network growth, TVL up 20% to $10 billion in November per DefiLlama, and Oobit’s promise of tap-to-pay USDT at 100 million merchants, the marriage of Solana news and public-company exposure delivered a brutal reminder that crypto tailwinds don’t automatically lift every boat.

The Deal That Sparked Solana News — And a Stock Rout

VCI Global closed the first $50 million tranche on November 11, acquiring 250 million OOB tokens at $0.20 each via restricted shares.

A second $50 million cash purchase followed Oobit’s November 12 listings on Kraken and KCEX.

Tether, already the world’s largest stablecoin issuer with $183 billion in circulation, became VCI Global’s biggest shareholder overnight.

Oobit itself had migrated to Solana weeks earlier for sub-second settlements, leveraging the chain’s 65,000 TPS capacity audited by OtterSec in November 2025.

The pitch: instant fiat conversion for USDT, BTC, and ETH at Visa/Mastercard terminals worldwide, a use case Tether first funded with a $25 million Series A in February 2024 alongside Yakovenko and CMCC Global.

Reality hit fast. OOB opened at $0.7153 but cratered 86.8% to $0.094 by December 4, slashing the value of VCI Global’s initial stake from $50 million to roughly $23.5 million in under a month.

A follow-on purchase of 4.17 million tokens on November 26 at $0.24 average barely moved the needle.

From $9 Billion Valuation to $7.66 Million — The Numbers Behind the Fall

VCIG began 2025 trading near $1,440 (split-adjusted). By December 4 it closed at $1.17, a 99.9% wipeout that erased over $9 billion in market value.

Revenue actually grew 37% to $18.7 million in H1 2025, with Q3 guidance calling for 70% full-year growth to $47.3 million at 80% gross margins from AI and fintech consulting.

VCIG Stock YTD Chart| Source: Yahoo Finance

Yet dilution from a $5 million direct offering in October and the PIPE issuance overwhelmed fundamentals. Short interest sits at 11.7% of float (Finviz, December 4), amplifying downside pressure.

Solana itself thrived in November: daily active addresses topped 100 million, stablecoin transfers hit record volume, and TVL climbed to $10 billion.

Oobit’s integration promised real-world utility, yet the token’s 87% plunge underscores execution risk in payments verticals still dominated by Visa and Mastercard rails.

For public companies chasing Solana news headlines, VCI Global’s experience is cautionary. High-profile crypto exposure can ignite retail interest, volume exploded post-announcement, but without sustained token performance or clear revenue synergy, traditional investors treat it as pure speculation.

CEO Victor Hoo’s personal share purchases on November 21 and a new $200 million RWA mandate announced December 2 hint at recovery efforts, but the market remains unforgiving.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/12/05/solana-news-why-vci-globals-oob-deal-didnt-stop-a-99-9-ytd-rout/

Piyasa Fırsatı
OOB Logosu
OOB Fiyatı(OOB)
$0.0138
$0.0138$0.0138
+8.66%
USD
OOB (OOB) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Paylaş
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’

Knocking Bitcoin's lack of yield shows your ‘Western financial privilege’

                                                                               Macro analyst Luke Gromen’s comments come amid an ongoing debate over whether Bitcoin or Ether is the more attractive long-term option for traditional investors.                     Macro analyst Luke Gromen says the fact that Bitcoin doesn’t natively earn yield isn’t a weakness; it’s what makes it a safer store of value.“If you’re earning a yield, you are taking a risk,” Gromen told Natalie Brunell on the Coin Stories podcast on Wednesday, responding to a question about critics who dismiss Bitcoin (BTC) because they prefer yield-earning assets.“Anyone who says that is showing their Western financial privilege,” he added.Read more
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 14:22
Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how

Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how

The post Vitalik Buterin wants to build ‘the next generation of finance’ – Here’s how appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Journalist Posted: February 16, 2026
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/16 11:01