The post Decoding why UNI didn’t flinch after Vitalik’s Uniswap token sale appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin’s Uniswap token sale drew attentionThe post Decoding why UNI didn’t flinch after Vitalik’s Uniswap token sale appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin’s Uniswap token sale drew attention

Decoding why UNI didn’t flinch after Vitalik’s Uniswap token sale

Vitalik Buterin’s Uniswap token sale drew attention as UNI traded inside a tight range under persistent liquidity pressure.

High-profile on-chain activity often triggers volatility, yet Uniswap [UNI] showed restraint despite visible sell-side pressure. Price action stayed compressed, with volatility continuing to contract, pointing to hesitation rather than panic.

UNI remained capped beneath resistance as downside attempts lost momentum. Each dip slowed quickly, while upside bounces stalled just as fast. That balance reflected compression, not trend continuation.

Vitalik flow adds context

According to Lookonchain, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin sold 1,400 UNI worth $7.48K, 10,000 KNC worth $2.47K, and 40 trillion DINU about five hours earlier. The transfers returned a combined 16,796 USDC.

The UNI sale occurred during a period of dominant short liquidity. However, the transaction aligned with a familiar pattern tied to unsolicited tokens sent to Buterin’s public address.

That context mattered. The disposals reflected routine wallet housekeeping rather than directional conviction. The UNI amount stayed small relative to market depth, even as timing coincided with a liquidity-heavy zone.

Source: CoinGlass

Liquidity clustered near the $5.6 level, acting as both a magnet and firm resistance. Sellers defended that zone, while the sale failed to trigger any liquidation cascade. Control stayed intact.

Compression tightens as momentum fades

UNI pressed deeper into the final phase of a falling wedge. Price compression intensified as downside attempts weakened, pointing to exhaustion rather than a clean breakdown.

RSI printed a bullish divergence, showing momentum no longer confirmed lower prices. On higher timeframes, RSI remained below 40, reflecting longer-term weakness instead of panic.

Source: TradingView

Losing the $4.7 ascending support on higher timeframes could raise downside risk. For now, the $4.81 area stood as immediate 4-hour support, where buyers previously stepped in.

UNI supply continued leaving exchanges rather than entering them. That shift pointed to reduced immediate sell pressure despite the price remaining capped below resistance.

Source: CoinGlass

Fewer UNI tokens sat on exchanges, yet the price struggled to push higher as sellers defended key levels.

What it means for UNI

This left traders focused on the $5.6 liquidity band. A reclaim could flip short-term control and open room toward $6 as shorts reacted. Failure to reclaim keeps downside risk active, with deeper supports back in play.

A break above $10 remained the level that would invalidate UNI’s multi-year downtrend and reset higher-timeframe bias.


Final Thoughts

  • UNI’s muted response highlighted how liquidity, not headlines, currently dictates price behavior.
  • As compression deepened, traders may watch whether absorption turns into resolution.

Next: An Ethereum whale raises its holdings to $1.7B: Will this move affect ETH?

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/decoding-why-uni-didnt-flinch-after-vitaliks-uniswap-token-sale/

Piyasa Fırsatı
WHY Logosu
WHY Fiyatı(WHY)
$0.00000001529
$0.00000001529$0.00000001529
0.00%
USD
WHY (WHY) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Wyoming-based crypto bank Custodia files rehearing petition against Fed

Wyoming-based crypto bank Custodia files rehearing petition against Fed

The post Wyoming-based crypto bank Custodia files rehearing petition against Fed appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A Wyoming-based crypto bank has filed another
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 22:06
US economy adds 64,000 jobs in November but unemployment rate climbs to 4.6%

US economy adds 64,000 jobs in November but unemployment rate climbs to 4.6%

The post US economy adds 64,000 jobs in November but unemployment rate climbs to 4.6% appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The economy moved in two directions at
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 22:18