The post Italy’s AGCM hits Apple with $115M fine over antitrust violations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) has saddledThe post Italy’s AGCM hits Apple with $115M fine over antitrust violations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) has saddled

Italy’s AGCM hits Apple with $115M fine over antitrust violations

The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) has saddled Apple with a €98.6 million fine for misusing its privacy policies to interfere with third-party developers. 

Italy’s competition authority has imposed a fine of €98.6 million on Apple for allegedly abusing its dominant market position through its App Store practices. Regulators claim Apple created unfair competition in the App Store by imposing stricter privacy rules on third-party developers than on itself. 

Has Apple been fined by Italian authorities? 

The Italian Competition Authority, known as AGCM, recently concluded an investigation into the unfair application of Apple’s privacy policies that began in May 2023. A fine of €98.6 million ($115 million) has been imposed on the company. 

Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) feature was introduced in iOS 14.5 back in April 2021 in order to ensure that apps get permission before tracking user activities across other companies’ apps and websites. When users download or update apps, they see a prompt asking if they want to allow tracking. 

Italian regulators found that Apple requires its developers to comply with ATT, while Apple itself does not. Additionally, Apple’s consent screen does not meet privacy legislation requirements, which forces developers to ask users for permission twice. 

The AGCM said that its investigation was highly complex and conducted in coordination with the European Commission and other international antitrust regulators. The regulator’s 199-page ruling requires Apple to immediately cease these practices and refrain from similar conduct that would violate Italian antitrust law in the future.

Will Apple appeal Italy’s decision?

Apple says it will appeal the decision, but it is not known how long that process may take. The company is likely not required to pay the fine until the appeal concludes. However, Apple has 90 days to report how it will comply with the AGCM’s requirements.

Apple has so far defended its strong privacy protections for users. According to the company, the ATT is a user privacy feature that gives people control over their data, not an anti-competitive tool. 

In July, the company appealed against a €500 million fine imposed by the European Union over alleged anti-competitive practices on its App Store. That case focused on Apple restricting app developers from informing customers about alternative offers outside the App Store.

In 2021, AGCM fined Apple and Google €10 million each for aggressive data practices that did not clearly explain how personal data would be used. The authority also previously imposed a €173.3 million fine on Apple and Amazon over alleged limits on selling Apple products on Amazon’s Italian marketplace.

In November, Apple confirmed that its Apple Ads and Apple Maps are in compliance with the Digital Markets Act, leading to a decision on which of the services would receive the gatekeeper label. This designation would impose strict pro-competition obligations and additional regulatory oversight.

French antitrust authorities earlier this year handed Apple a €150 million fine over its app tracking privacy feature, and a similar antitrust investigation into App Tracking Transparency is currently ongoing in Poland.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/italy-agcm-apple-fine-antitrust-violations/

Piyasa Fırsatı
RWAX Logosu
RWAX Fiyatı(APP)
$0.0002561
$0.0002561$0.0002561
+6.04%
USD
RWAX (APP) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Successful Medical Writing from Protocol to CTD Training Course: Understand International Guidelines and Standards (Mar 23rd – Mar 24th, 2026) – ResearchAndMarkets.com

Successful Medical Writing from Protocol to CTD Training Course: Understand International Guidelines and Standards (Mar 23rd – Mar 24th, 2026) – ResearchAndMarkets.com

DUBLIN–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The “Successful Medical Writing – from Protocol to CTD Training Course (Mar 23rd – Mar 24th, 2026)” training has been added to ResearchAndMarkets
Paylaş
AI Journal2026/01/03 01:15
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41