Solana validators are voting on SIMD-0326 , a major protocol overhaul that would replace the current TowerBFT consensus mechanism with Alpenglow, a new system promising to reduce block finality from 12.8 seconds to as low as 100-150 milliseconds. The proposal introduces direct voting, signature aggregation, and a 1.6 SOL per epoch Validator Admission Ticket fee to maintain economic barriers while eliminating on-chain vote transactions. 🚨BREAKING: @Anza_xyz has started the Solana community governance process for SIMD 326, Alpenglow, the most significant consensus upgrade proposal in the network’s history. Alpenglow is a new consensus algorithm designed to achieve 150ms block finality. The timeline includes a… pic.twitter.com/rgJ8anu1b0 — SolanaFloor (@SolanaFloor) August 14, 2025 The Alpenglow upgrade centers on Votor, a lightweight voting protocol that finalizes blocks through single or dual-round voting processes depending on network conditions. Validators would exchange votes directly using cryptographic aggregates to prove consensus, dramatically reducing bandwidth overhead from heavy gossip traffic. The system introduces robust certification mechanisms with different certificate types for notarizing, skipping, or finalizing blocks based on validator votes. Revolutionary Consensus Overhaul Targets Web2-Level Performance Alpenglow implementation will be a fundamental departure from Solana’s Proof-of-History and TowerBFT mechanisms. Source: Solana White Paper It will address performance and security limitations that impose long finality delays without formal safety guarantees. The new architecture operates on a “20+20” resilience model, allowing the protocol to remain live even if 20% of validators are adversarial and another 20% are unresponsive. The protocol divides time into discrete slots with assigned leaders chosen through a randomized, verifiable process. Each leader manages consecutive slots during their window, collecting transactions to create blocks split into intermediate slices and smaller shreds. These shreds are initially distributed across the network using Turbine, with plans to replace it with the more efficient Rotor system in a later update, which will require separate SIMD approval. Off-chain voting replaces the current system where validators submit on-chain vote transactions for each slot, eliminating significant bandwidth, transaction fees, and processing overhead. Source: B2BInPay Validators cast exactly one vote per slot, with conflicting votes being detectable and participation failures resulting in exclusion from rewards and potential removal from the active validator set. The Validator Admission Ticket mechanism requires each validator to pay 1.6 SOL per epoch before participation, with the fee burned to offset inflation while preserving current economic dynamics. This upfront cost replaces direct transaction fees for voting, maintaining an equivalent economic barrier during the transition period. Community Debate Centers on Economic Impact and Implementation Risks Validator responses reveal mixed sentiment about the upgrade’s economic implications and implementation strategy. One validator, Firedancer, expressed strong support, noting the simplifications would save months of work addressing TowerBFT edge cases. However, other community members raised concerns about the 1.6 SOL fee creating high entry barriers for new validators while protecting the current active set. Source: Solana Forum Alternative VAT models emerged in discussions, including pro-rata distribution based on active stake or segmentation by stake size with tiered fees ranging from 0.5 to 5 SOL per epoch. Supporters argue the current 1.6 SOL fee represents only 80% of existing on-chain voting costs, making participation slightly more affordable while maintaining network security. Technical concerns focus on transaction expiration policies without Proof-of-History, validator performance tracking with off-chain voting, and the absence of detailed testing and deployment plans. Community members questioned how blockhash replacement would prevent double-spend attacks and whether timeout mechanisms would affect block building time and Jito auction processes. The voting process spans epochs 833-842, with discussion periods followed by stake weight collection, token distribution through the adapted Jito Merkle Distributor tool, and final voting across Yes, No, and Abstain addresses. The proposal requires a two-thirds majority of Yes versus No votes to pass, with a 33% quorum threshold including abstentions. The upgrade comes as Solana continues governance evolution following previous contentious votes, including the rejected SIMD-0228 dynamic inflation proposal that failed to achieve supermajority approval despite initial institutional support. Looking forward, the Alpenglow upgrade aims to achieve consensus latency at Web2-level performance, while also strengthening security posture and economic fairness. However, critics call for comprehensive testing plans and clearer implementation strategies before approving such fundamental protocol changes during the current bull market cycle.Solana validators are voting on SIMD-0326 , a major protocol overhaul that would replace the current TowerBFT consensus mechanism with Alpenglow, a new system promising to reduce block finality from 12.8 seconds to as low as 100-150 milliseconds. The proposal introduces direct voting, signature aggregation, and a 1.6 SOL per epoch Validator Admission Ticket fee to maintain economic barriers while eliminating on-chain vote transactions. 🚨BREAKING: @Anza_xyz has started the Solana community governance process for SIMD 326, Alpenglow, the most significant consensus upgrade proposal in the network’s history. Alpenglow is a new consensus algorithm designed to achieve 150ms block finality. The timeline includes a… pic.twitter.com/rgJ8anu1b0 — SolanaFloor (@SolanaFloor) August 14, 2025 The Alpenglow upgrade centers on Votor, a lightweight voting protocol that finalizes blocks through single or dual-round voting processes depending on network conditions. Validators would exchange votes directly using cryptographic aggregates to prove consensus, dramatically reducing bandwidth overhead from heavy gossip traffic. The system introduces robust certification mechanisms with different certificate types for notarizing, skipping, or finalizing blocks based on validator votes. Revolutionary Consensus Overhaul Targets Web2-Level Performance Alpenglow implementation will be a fundamental departure from Solana’s Proof-of-History and TowerBFT mechanisms. Source: Solana White Paper It will address performance and security limitations that impose long finality delays without formal safety guarantees. The new architecture operates on a “20+20” resilience model, allowing the protocol to remain live even if 20% of validators are adversarial and another 20% are unresponsive. The protocol divides time into discrete slots with assigned leaders chosen through a randomized, verifiable process. Each leader manages consecutive slots during their window, collecting transactions to create blocks split into intermediate slices and smaller shreds. These shreds are initially distributed across the network using Turbine, with plans to replace it with the more efficient Rotor system in a later update, which will require separate SIMD approval. Off-chain voting replaces the current system where validators submit on-chain vote transactions for each slot, eliminating significant bandwidth, transaction fees, and processing overhead. Source: B2BInPay Validators cast exactly one vote per slot, with conflicting votes being detectable and participation failures resulting in exclusion from rewards and potential removal from the active validator set. The Validator Admission Ticket mechanism requires each validator to pay 1.6 SOL per epoch before participation, with the fee burned to offset inflation while preserving current economic dynamics. This upfront cost replaces direct transaction fees for voting, maintaining an equivalent economic barrier during the transition period. Community Debate Centers on Economic Impact and Implementation Risks Validator responses reveal mixed sentiment about the upgrade’s economic implications and implementation strategy. One validator, Firedancer, expressed strong support, noting the simplifications would save months of work addressing TowerBFT edge cases. However, other community members raised concerns about the 1.6 SOL fee creating high entry barriers for new validators while protecting the current active set. Source: Solana Forum Alternative VAT models emerged in discussions, including pro-rata distribution based on active stake or segmentation by stake size with tiered fees ranging from 0.5 to 5 SOL per epoch. Supporters argue the current 1.6 SOL fee represents only 80% of existing on-chain voting costs, making participation slightly more affordable while maintaining network security. Technical concerns focus on transaction expiration policies without Proof-of-History, validator performance tracking with off-chain voting, and the absence of detailed testing and deployment plans. Community members questioned how blockhash replacement would prevent double-spend attacks and whether timeout mechanisms would affect block building time and Jito auction processes. The voting process spans epochs 833-842, with discussion periods followed by stake weight collection, token distribution through the adapted Jito Merkle Distributor tool, and final voting across Yes, No, and Abstain addresses. The proposal requires a two-thirds majority of Yes versus No votes to pass, with a 33% quorum threshold including abstentions. The upgrade comes as Solana continues governance evolution following previous contentious votes, including the rejected SIMD-0228 dynamic inflation proposal that failed to achieve supermajority approval despite initial institutional support. Looking forward, the Alpenglow upgrade aims to achieve consensus latency at Web2-level performance, while also strengthening security posture and economic fairness. However, critics call for comprehensive testing plans and clearer implementation strategies before approving such fundamental protocol changes during the current bull market cycle.

Solana Votes on Alpenglow Upgrade to Cut Block Finality from 12.8s to 150ms

Solana validators are voting on SIMD-0326, a major protocol overhaul that would replace the current TowerBFT consensus mechanism with Alpenglow, a new system promising to reduce block finality from 12.8 seconds to as low as 100-150 milliseconds.

The proposal introduces direct voting, signature aggregation, and a 1.6 SOL per epoch Validator Admission Ticket fee to maintain economic barriers while eliminating on-chain vote transactions.

The Alpenglow upgrade centers on Votor, a lightweight voting protocol that finalizes blocks through single or dual-round voting processes depending on network conditions.

Validators would exchange votes directly using cryptographic aggregates to prove consensus, dramatically reducing bandwidth overhead from heavy gossip traffic.

The system introduces robust certification mechanisms with different certificate types for notarizing, skipping, or finalizing blocks based on validator votes.

Revolutionary Consensus Overhaul Targets Web2-Level Performance

Alpenglow implementation will be a fundamental departure from Solana’s Proof-of-History and TowerBFT mechanisms.

Solana Votes on Alpenglow Upgrade to Cut Block Finality from 12.8s to 150msSource: Solana White Paper

It will address performance and security limitations that impose long finality delays without formal safety guarantees.

The new architecture operates on a “20+20” resilience model, allowing the protocol to remain live even if 20% of validators are adversarial and another 20% are unresponsive.

The protocol divides time into discrete slots with assigned leaders chosen through a randomized, verifiable process.

Each leader manages consecutive slots during their window, collecting transactions to create blocks split into intermediate slices and smaller shreds.

These shreds are initially distributed across the network using Turbine, with plans to replace it with the more efficient Rotor system in a later update, which will require separate SIMD approval.

Off-chain voting replaces the current system where validators submit on-chain vote transactions for each slot, eliminating significant bandwidth, transaction fees, and processing overhead.

Solana Votes on Alpenglow Upgrade to Cut Block Finality from 12.8s to 150msSource: B2BInPay

Validators cast exactly one vote per slot, with conflicting votes being detectable and participation failures resulting in exclusion from rewards and potential removal from the active validator set.

The Validator Admission Ticket mechanism requires each validator to pay 1.6 SOL per epoch before participation, with the fee burned to offset inflation while preserving current economic dynamics.

This upfront cost replaces direct transaction fees for voting, maintaining an equivalent economic barrier during the transition period.

Community Debate Centers on Economic Impact and Implementation Risks

Validator responses reveal mixed sentiment about the upgrade’s economic implications and implementation strategy.

One validator, Firedancer, expressed strong support, noting the simplifications would save months of work addressing TowerBFT edge cases.

However, other community members raised concerns about the 1.6 SOL fee creating high entry barriers for new validators while protecting the current active set.

Solana Votes on Alpenglow Upgrade to Cut Block Finality from 12.8s to 150msSource: Solana Forum

Alternative VAT models emerged in discussions, including pro-rata distribution based on active stake or segmentation by stake size with tiered fees ranging from 0.5 to 5 SOL per epoch.

Supporters argue the current 1.6 SOL fee represents only 80% of existing on-chain voting costs, making participation slightly more affordable while maintaining network security.

Technical concerns focus on transaction expiration policies without Proof-of-History, validator performance tracking with off-chain voting, and the absence of detailed testing and deployment plans.

Community members questioned how blockhash replacement would prevent double-spend attacks and whether timeout mechanisms would affect block building time and Jito auction processes.

The voting process spans epochs 833-842, with discussion periods followed by stake weight collection, token distribution through the adapted Jito Merkle Distributor tool, and final voting across Yes, No, and Abstain addresses.

The proposal requires a two-thirds majority of Yes versus No votes to pass, with a 33% quorum threshold including abstentions.

The upgrade comes as Solana continues governance evolution following previous contentious votes, including the rejected SIMD-0228 dynamic inflation proposal that failed to achieve supermajority approval despite initial institutional support.

Looking forward, the Alpenglow upgrade aims to achieve consensus latency at Web2-level performance, while also strengthening security posture and economic fairness.

However, critics call for comprehensive testing plans and clearer implementation strategies before approving such fundamental protocol changes during the current bull market cycle.

Piyasa Fırsatı
Whiterock Logosu
Whiterock Fiyatı(WHITE)
$0.0001208
$0.0001208$0.0001208
-1.62%
USD
Whiterock (WHITE) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative

South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative

The post South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea has witnessed a pivotal development in its cryptocurrency landscape with BDACS introducing the nation’s first won-backed stablecoin, KRW1, built on the Avalanche network. This stablecoin is anchored by won assets stored at Woori Bank in a 1:1 ratio, ensuring high security. Continue Reading:South Korea Launches Innovative Stablecoin Initiative Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/south-korea-launches-innovative-stablecoin-initiative
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 17:54
Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

Trump Cancels Tech, AI Trade Negotiations With The UK

The US pauses a $41B UK tech and AI deal as trade talks stall, with disputes over food standards, market access, and rules abroad.   The US has frozen a major tech
Paylaş
LiveBitcoinNews2025/12/17 01:00
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Paylaş
Medium2025/09/18 14:40