Rust ranged patterns can now use exclusive endpoints, written a..b or ..b similar to the Range and RangeTo expression types.Rust ranged patterns can now use exclusive endpoints, written a..b or ..b similar to the Range and RangeTo expression types.

Rust 1.80.0: Exclusive Ranges in Patterns, Stabilized APIs, and More

The Rust team is happy to announce a new version of Rust, 1.80.0. Rust is a programming language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.

\ If you have a previous version of Rust installed via rustup, you can get 1.80.0 with:

$ rustup update stable 

\ If you don't have it already, you can get rustup from the appropriate page on our website, and check out the detailed release notes for 1.80.0.

\ If you'd like to help us out by testing future releases, you might consider updating locally to use the beta channel (rustup default beta) or the nightly channel (rustup default nightly). Please report any bugs you might come across!

What's in 1.80.0 stable

LazyCell and LazyLock

These "lazy" types delay the initialization of their data until first access. They are similar to the OnceCell and OnceLock types stabilized in 1.70, but with the initialization function included in the cell. This completes the stabilization of functionality adopted into the standard library from the popular lazy_static and once_cell crates.

\ LazyLock is the thread-safe option, making it suitable for places like static values. For example, both the spawn thread and the main scope will see the exact same duration below, since LAZY_TIME will be initialized once, by whichever ends up accessing the static first. Neither use has to know how to initialize it, unlike they would with OnceLock::get_or_init().

use std::sync::LazyLock; use std::time::Instant;  static LAZY_TIME: LazyLock<Instant> = LazyLock::new(Instant::now);  fn main() {     let start = Instant::now();     std::thread::scope(|s| {         s.spawn(|| {             println!("Thread lazy time is {:?}", LAZY_TIME.duration_since(start));         });         println!("Main lazy time is {:?}", LAZY_TIME.duration_since(start));     }); } 

LazyCell does the same thing without thread synchronization, so it doesn't implement Sync, which is needed for static, but it can still be used in thread_local! statics (with distinct initialization per thread). Either type can also be used in other data structures as well, depending on thread-safety needs, so lazy initialization is available everywhere!

Checked cfg names and values

In 1.79, rustc stabilized a --check-cfg flag, and now Cargo 1.80 is enabling those checks for all cfg names and values that it knows (in addition to the well known names and values from rustc). This includes feature names from Cargo.toml as well as new cargo::rustc-check-cfg output from build scripts.

\ Unexpected cfgs are reported by the warn-by-default unexpected_cfgs lint, which is meant to catch typos or other misconfiguration. For example, in a project with an optional rayon dependency, this code is configured for the wrong feature value:

fn main() {     println!("Hello, world!");      #[cfg(feature = "crayon")]     rayon::join(         || println!("Hello, Thing One!"),         || println!("Hello, Thing Two!"),     ); }   warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `crayon`  --> src/main.rs:4:11   | 4 |     #[cfg(feature = "crayon")]   |           ^^^^^^^^^^--------   |                     |   |                     help: there is a expected value with a similar name: `"rayon"`   |   = note: expected values for `feature` are: `rayon`   = help: consider adding `crayon` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`   = note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration   = note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default 

The same warning is reported regardless of whether the actual rayon feature is enabled or not.

\ The [lints] table in the Cargo.toml manifest can also be used to extend the list of known names and values for custom cfg. rustc automatically provides the syntax to use in the warning.

[lints.rust] unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(foo, values("bar"))'] } 

\ You can read more about this feature in a previous blog post announcing the availability of the feature on nightly.

Exclusive ranges in patterns

Rust ranged patterns can now use exclusive endpoints, written a..b or ..b similar to the Range and RangeTo expression types. For example, the following patterns can now use the same constants for the end of one pattern and the start of the next:

pub fn size_prefix(n: u32) -> &'static str {     const K: u32 = 10u32.pow(3);     const M: u32 = 10u32.pow(6);     const G: u32 = 10u32.pow(9);     match n {         ..K => "",         K..M => "k",         M..G => "M",         G.. => "G",     } } 

\ Previously, only inclusive (a..=b or ..=b) or open (a..) ranges were allowed in patterns, so code like this would require separate constants for inclusive endpoints like K - 1.

\ Exclusive ranges have been implemented as an unstable feature for a long time, but the blocking concern was that they might add confusion and increase the chance of off-by-one errors in patterns. To that end, exhaustiveness checking has been enhanced to better detect gaps in pattern matching, and new lints non_contiguous_range_endpoints and overlapping_range_endpoints will help detect cases where you might want to switch exclusive patterns to inclusive, or vice versa.

Stabilized APIs

  • impl Default for Rc<CStr>
  • impl Default for Rc<str>
  • impl Default for Rc<[T]>
  • impl Default for Arc<str>
  • impl Default for Arc<CStr>
  • impl Default for Arc<[T]>
  • impl IntoIterator for Box<[T]>
  • impl FromIterator<String> for Box<str>
  • impl FromIterator<char> for Box<str>
  • LazyCell
  • LazyLock
  • Duration::div_duration_f32
  • Duration::div_duration_f64
  • Option::take_if
  • Seek::seek_relative
  • BinaryHeap::as_slice
  • NonNull::offset
  • NonNull::byte_offset
  • NonNull::add
  • NonNull::byte_add
  • NonNull::sub
  • NonNull::byte_sub
  • NonNull::offset_from
  • NonNull::byte_offset_from
  • NonNull::read
  • NonNull::read_volatile
  • NonNull::read_unaligned
  • NonNull::write
  • NonNull::write_volatile
  • NonNull::write_unaligned
  • NonNull::write_bytes
  • NonNull::copy_to
  • NonNull::copy_to_nonoverlapping
  • NonNull::copy_from
  • NonNull::copy_from_nonoverlapping
  • NonNull::replace
  • NonNull::swap
  • NonNull::drop_in_place
  • NonNull::align_offset
  • <[T]>::split_at_checked
  • <[T]>::split_at_mut_checked
  • str::split_at_checked
  • str::split_at_mut_checked
  • str::trim_ascii
  • str::trim_ascii_start
  • str::trim_ascii_end
  • <[u8]>::trim_ascii
  • <[u8]>::trim_ascii_start
  • <[u8]>::trim_ascii_end
  • Ipv4Addr::BITS
  • Ipv4Addr::to_bits
  • Ipv4Addr::from_bits
  • Ipv6Addr::BITS
  • Ipv6Addr::to_bits
  • Ipv6Addr::from_bits
  • Vec::<[T; N]>::into_flattened
  • <[[T; N]]>::as_flattened
  • <[[T; N]]>::as_flattened_mut

These APIs are now stable in const contexts:

  • <[T]>::last_chunk
  • BinaryHeap::new

Other changes

Check out everything that changed in Rust, Cargo, and Clippy.

Contributors to 1.80.0

Many people came together to create Rust 1.80.0. We couldn't have done it without all of you. Thanks!


The Rust Release Team

\ Also published here

\ Photo by Lay Naik on Unsplash

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.000913
$0.000913$0.000913
-9.24%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Husky Inu (HINU) Completes Move To $0.00020688

Husky Inu (HINU) Completes Move To $0.00020688

Husky Inu (HINU) has completed its latest price jump, rising from $0.00020628 to $0.00020688. The price jump is part of the project’s pre-launch phase, which began on April 1, 2025.
Share
Cryptodaily2025/09/18 01:10
How to Pair Pearl Necklaces with Your Bridal Neckline

How to Pair Pearl Necklaces with Your Bridal Neckline

Your wedding day is a tapestry of moments, emotions, and style choices that culminate in a lifelong memory. Among the myriad of decisions a bride faces, selecting
Share
Techbullion2026/02/02 16:54
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36