The post Why banks still won’t touch XRP appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Insufficient privacy is the reason why most banks choose not to use XRP, according to Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse. Garlinghouse made the claim this week during a conversation with one of the XRP Ledger’s (XRPL) 35 most senior validators, a default unique node list (dUNL) operator known as “Vet.” During the talk, Garlinghouse admitted that privacy features are still insufficiently compelling for certain types of financial giants that the XRP community has been courting for over a decade. “I asked Brad here what’s the path to get more institutional adoption on the XRP Ledger, so that institutions are comfortable with sharing transaction hashes with us,” Vet summarized. “He said privacy.” Now that fans of Ripple have had time to absorb the decisions made by SWIFT and Stripe to opt for XRP competitors, Garlinghouse is reflecting on the XRPL’s insufficient privacy offering as a clear obstacle to institutional adoption. I asked Brad here what’s the path to get more institutional adoption on the XRP Ledger, so that institutions are comfortable with sharing tx hashes with us. >He said privacy. Fast forward it all makes sense and fits nicely together. We passed many compliance amendments like… pic.twitter.com/OfTSBvATEH — Vet 🏴‍☠️ (@Vet_X0) October 5, 2025 No reason to publish everything on-chain For reasons of compliance, risk, regulation, or even basic respect for clients’ privacy, financial institutions don’t want to broadcast all transactions — nor even hashed transactions — publicly. For example, imagine an entity with a steady cadence of transactions suddenly dumping millions of hashes onto the blockchain. This unexpected flurry might move markets or prompt regulatory probes, needlessly burdening the institution with costly labor simply because it chose to broadcast hashes into the XRPL. Even pseudonymizing transactions might fail to sufficiently obscure the institution’s identity. Blockchain forensics can often deanonymize transactions through… The post Why banks still won’t touch XRP appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Insufficient privacy is the reason why most banks choose not to use XRP, according to Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse. Garlinghouse made the claim this week during a conversation with one of the XRP Ledger’s (XRPL) 35 most senior validators, a default unique node list (dUNL) operator known as “Vet.” During the talk, Garlinghouse admitted that privacy features are still insufficiently compelling for certain types of financial giants that the XRP community has been courting for over a decade. “I asked Brad here what’s the path to get more institutional adoption on the XRP Ledger, so that institutions are comfortable with sharing transaction hashes with us,” Vet summarized. “He said privacy.” Now that fans of Ripple have had time to absorb the decisions made by SWIFT and Stripe to opt for XRP competitors, Garlinghouse is reflecting on the XRPL’s insufficient privacy offering as a clear obstacle to institutional adoption. I asked Brad here what’s the path to get more institutional adoption on the XRP Ledger, so that institutions are comfortable with sharing tx hashes with us. >He said privacy. Fast forward it all makes sense and fits nicely together. We passed many compliance amendments like… pic.twitter.com/OfTSBvATEH — Vet 🏴‍☠️ (@Vet_X0) October 5, 2025 No reason to publish everything on-chain For reasons of compliance, risk, regulation, or even basic respect for clients’ privacy, financial institutions don’t want to broadcast all transactions — nor even hashed transactions — publicly. For example, imagine an entity with a steady cadence of transactions suddenly dumping millions of hashes onto the blockchain. This unexpected flurry might move markets or prompt regulatory probes, needlessly burdening the institution with costly labor simply because it chose to broadcast hashes into the XRPL. Even pseudonymizing transactions might fail to sufficiently obscure the institution’s identity. Blockchain forensics can often deanonymize transactions through…

Why banks still won’t touch XRP

Insufficient privacy is the reason why most banks choose not to use XRP, according to Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse.

Garlinghouse made the claim this week during a conversation with one of the XRP Ledger’s (XRPL) 35 most senior validators, a default unique node list (dUNL) operator known as “Vet.”

During the talk, Garlinghouse admitted that privacy features are still insufficiently compelling for certain types of financial giants that the XRP community has been courting for over a decade.

“I asked Brad here what’s the path to get more institutional adoption on the XRP Ledger, so that institutions are comfortable with sharing transaction hashes with us,” Vet summarized. “He said privacy.”

Now that fans of Ripple have had time to absorb the decisions made by SWIFT and Stripe to opt for XRP competitors, Garlinghouse is reflecting on the XRPL’s insufficient privacy offering as a clear obstacle to institutional adoption.

No reason to publish everything on-chain

For reasons of compliance, risk, regulation, or even basic respect for clients’ privacy, financial institutions don’t want to broadcast all transactions — nor even hashed transactions — publicly.

For example, imagine an entity with a steady cadence of transactions suddenly dumping millions of hashes onto the blockchain.

This unexpected flurry might move markets or prompt regulatory probes, needlessly burdening the institution with costly labor simply because it chose to broadcast hashes into the XRPL.

Even pseudonymizing transactions might fail to sufficiently obscure the institution’s identity. Blockchain forensics can often deanonymize transactions through machine learning, big data, probabilistic inferences, or AI.

Read more: Ripple played Trump to pump XRP — now he’s cutting ties

Ripple still working on features the biggest institutions want

To its credit, Ripple is already pursuing an expanded suite of privacy features and adding support for financial institutions.

Indeed, it’s already implemented a know your customer control protocol called Credentials, making it possible to verify identity directly on the XRPL without relying on a third-party service.

XRPL also supports decentralized identifiers, or DIDs, as a way for institutions to manage their digital identities. Vet was also optimistic about multi purpose tokens, DEXs, and XLS-101 smart contracts as additional selling points for financial institutions.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/ripples-privacy-problem-why-banks-still-wont-touch-xrp/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.009402
$0.009402$0.009402
+0.94%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP Price Prediction: Ripple CEO at Davos Predicts Crypto ATHs This Year – $5 XRP Next?

XRP Price Prediction: Ripple CEO at Davos Predicts Crypto ATHs This Year – $5 XRP Next?

XRP has traded near $1.90 as Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has predicted from Davos that the crypto market will reach new highs this year. Analysts have pointed
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 04:49
Supreme Court rejected Trump’s attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook

Supreme Court rejected Trump’s attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook

The Supreme Court has refused to support President Donald Trump in his attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, after justices raised serious doubts
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/22 05:30