Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder of the failed exchange platform FTX, is making headlines again with explosive statements.Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder of the failed exchange platform FTX, is making headlines again with explosive statements.

SBF accuses: “political arrest to block my testimony on crypto”

sam bankman fried sec

Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder of the failed exchange platform FTX, is back in the spotlight with explosive statements that cast new shadows on his legal saga and the political dynamics that have involved the cryptocurrency sector in recent years. 

In a post published on the GETTR platform, Bankman-Fried argued that his arrest in 2022 was orchestrated for political reasons, particularly after he changed his political donation strategy in favor of the Republicans and lost the favor of the Biden administration.

From Left to Center: The Political Shift of Sam Bankman-Fried

In his message, Sam Bankman-Fried recounted his political journey, explaining how in 2020 he positioned himself on center-left stances, only to shift towards a more centrist line in 2022. 

This change would have been driven by the observation of a growing hostility towards the crypto world by the SEC led by Gary Gensler and the Department of Justice under the Biden presidency. 

wrote Bankman-Fried.

The arrest on the eve of a key vote on crypto

According to the statements of the young Sam Bankman-Fried, his legal case allegedly experienced a suspicious acceleration precisely in conjunction with crucial events for the cryptocurrency sector. 

The former CEO of FTX claims that his arrest was planned to occur just before the vote on a crypto law that he himself supported, and even the day before his scheduled testimony before Congress. A timing that, according to Bankman-Fried, would not have been coincidental.

These accusations echo the concerns expressed at the time by some Republican members of the House, who had speculated that the arrest was orchestrated precisely to prevent him from testifying. The same lawmakers had requested Gary Gensler to hand over all internal communications related to the matter.

Key Messages “Conveniently Lost” by the SEC

Reigniting suspicions, Bankman-Fried highlighted how Gensler had “conveniently lost” key messages related to his case. An accusation that finds confirmation in recent developments: the SEC’s Office of the Inspector General has indeed admitted that Gensler’s government phone underwent a “corporate deletion” that erased all messages exchanged between October 2022 and September 2023.

This period coincides not only with the collapse of FTX and the arrest of SBF, but also with other significant enforcement actions by the SEC against companies in the crypto sector. According to the SEC, Gensler’s phone stopped syncing with the agency’s systems in July 2023, later being reported as “inactive” for 62 days, despite functioning normally.

Coinbase and the Case of “Evidence Destruction”

The deletion of Gensler’s messages did not go unnoticed even among industry operators. Coinbase, one of the leading cryptocurrency exchanges, accused the SEC of deliberately eliminating nearly a year of communications from its former Chairman, openly speaking of “destruction of evidence” and calling for sanctions against the agency.

Congress Investigates SEC’s Data Management

Concerns about transparency and data management by the SEC have led House Republicans to initiate a formal investigation. The subject of the inquiry is precisely the deletion of Gensler’s messages, with doubts ranging from transparency, to IT management, up to compliance with federal document retention laws.

Bankman-Fried, from crypto prodigy to symbol of the crisis

Today, Sam Bankman-Fried is detained at FCI Terminal Island, after being convicted for one of the largest financial fraud cases in recent history. According to prosecutors, he allegedly diverted billions of customer funds to his investment firm, Alameda Research, using them for risky trades, real estate purchases, and political donations.

Once considered a prodigy of the crypto world and one of the major political donors, Bankman-Fried now faces a long prison sentence. Despite the conviction, he continues to claim that his downfall was driven as much by political motivations as by management errors.

A sector under pressure between politics and regulation

Bankman-Fried’s revelations reignite the debate on the intertwining of politics, regulation, and the future of cryptocurrencies in the United States. Accusations of political manipulation, the suspicious deletion of key communications, and ongoing investigations into the SEC contribute to fueling a climate of uncertainty and distrust towards the institutions responsible for overseeing the sector.

In a context where Bitcoin and other digital assets continue to gain centrality in global financial markets, the transparency and fairness of regulatory authorities become essential elements for the credibility and stability of the entire crypto ecosystem.

The future of crypto regulation in the United States

The case of Sam Bankman-Fried and the investigations into the SEC’s practices represent a crucial testing ground for cryptocurrency regulation in the United States. The demand for clarity on the motivations and methods that led to the arrest of one of the industry’s key figures, along with the need to ensure the proper preservation of institutional communications, will be central themes in the coming months.

While the sector awaits answers, attention remains high on how American politics and institutions will manage the challenge posed by digital innovation, balancing the needs for security, transparency, and economic development.

Market Opportunity
Blockstreet Logo
Blockstreet Price(BLOCK)
$0.013953
$0.013953$0.013953
+5.72%
USD
Blockstreet (BLOCK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30