TLDR GESPA claims FIFA Collect’s NFT rewards involve chance-based gambling elements. FIFA’s NFT platform faces scrutiny for offering rewards with monetary stakes. FIFA Collect launched in 2022 but is now under legal investigation in Switzerland. Swiss law only permits two regulated nationwide sports gambling providers. Switzerland’s Gambling Supervisory Authority (GESPA) has filed a formal complaint [...] The post Swiss Regulator Takes Action Against FIFA’s NFT Platform Over Gambling Concerns appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR GESPA claims FIFA Collect’s NFT rewards involve chance-based gambling elements. FIFA’s NFT platform faces scrutiny for offering rewards with monetary stakes. FIFA Collect launched in 2022 but is now under legal investigation in Switzerland. Swiss law only permits two regulated nationwide sports gambling providers. Switzerland’s Gambling Supervisory Authority (GESPA) has filed a formal complaint [...] The post Swiss Regulator Takes Action Against FIFA’s NFT Platform Over Gambling Concerns appeared first on CoinCentral.

Swiss Regulator Takes Action Against FIFA’s NFT Platform Over Gambling Concerns

TLDR

  • GESPA claims FIFA Collect’s NFT rewards involve chance-based gambling elements.
  • FIFA’s NFT platform faces scrutiny for offering rewards with monetary stakes.
  • FIFA Collect launched in 2022 but is now under legal investigation in Switzerland.
  • Swiss law only permits two regulated nationwide sports gambling providers.

Switzerland’s Gambling Supervisory Authority (GESPA) has filed a formal complaint against FIFA’s NFT platform, FIFA Collect, accusing it of operating as an unlicensed gambling service. GESPA’s complaint centers on the platform’s competitions, which involve users participating in challenges and airdrops to earn rewards, alleging that these activities contain elements of chance and require monetary investment, which could classify them as gambling under Swiss law.

GESPA’s Complaint and Regulatory Concerns

GESPA’s complaint asserts that FIFA Collect’s operations involve competitions that feature rewards based on chance, which aligns with the definition of gambling under Swiss regulations.

According to the authority, the rewards are linked to monetary stakes, with the chance of winning being dependent on random draws or similar methods. The regulator noted that, in order to participate in these competitions, users must make a financial investment. If they succeed, they receive monetary rewards, placing these activities into the categories of lotteries or sports betting.

Switzerland’s gambling regulations are strict, with only two licensed providers for nationwide sports betting: Sporttip and Jouez Sport. As a result, GESPA has raised concerns about the legal status of FIFA Collect’s operations, given that the platform offers opportunities for users to earn prizes based on chance. The authority’s complaint stems from these potential breaches of the Swiss gambling law.

FIFA Collect’s Web3 Model and NFTs

Launched in 2022, FIFA Collect operates on the Algorand blockchain, allowing users to buy, trade, and collect digital assets such as NFTs related to the FIFA World Cup. The platform enables users to participate in challenges and other activities, which can lead to rewards such as airdrops or special access to FIFA events.

FIFA’s decision to incorporate Web3 technologies into its platform has introduced new legal challenges, particularly as the regulatory landscape struggles to adapt to these evolving technologies.

In addition to its NFT offerings, FIFA Collect has sold NFTs related to the upcoming 2026 FIFA World Cup. These “Right to Buy” NFTs give holders the option to purchase World Cup tickets at face value, potentially circumventing inflated prices in secondary markets. However, FIFA Collect’s use of NFTs and blockchain technology is increasingly under scrutiny as authorities attempt to define the legal boundaries of such platforms.

FIFA’s Response and Future Plans

While FIFA and Modex, the Web3 service provider supporting FIFA Collect, have not yet provided a response to the formal complaint, the issue raises important questions about the regulation of Web3 platforms. FIFA has continued to push forward with its blockchain ambitions, with plans to migrate the FIFA Collect platform to its own blockchain. This layer-1 subnet, based on the Avalanche network, is designed to provide a more secure and scalable platform for users.

Despite the regulatory concerns raised by GESPA, FIFA remains committed to its digital initiatives. The platform’s transition to a new blockchain is expected to offer better services for users while addressing some of the challenges associated with its current operations.

The complaint filed by GESPA underscores the challenges regulators face when addressing emerging technologies like NFTs and blockchain-based platforms. As these technologies continue to evolve, regulators must navigate the complexities of applying traditional laws to new models of engagement and business. GESPA’s actions against FIFA Collect may set a precedent for how similar platforms will be treated under Swiss law in the future.

The case also highlights the broader issue of whether existing regulatory frameworks are adequate to address the unique characteristics of Web3 platforms. As more companies adopt blockchain technologies, the need for clear, comprehensive regulations will become increasingly important in ensuring legal compliance across different sectors.

The post Swiss Regulator Takes Action Against FIFA’s NFT Platform Over Gambling Concerns appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Horror Thriller ‘Bring Her Back’ Gets HBO Max Premiere Date

Horror Thriller ‘Bring Her Back’ Gets HBO Max Premiere Date

The post Horror Thriller ‘Bring Her Back’ Gets HBO Max Premiere Date appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jonah Wren Phillips in “Bring Her Back.” A24 Bring Her Back, a new A24 horror movie from the filmmakers of the smash hit Talk to Me, is coming soon to HBO Max. Bring Her Back opened in theaters on May 30 before debuting on digital streaming via premium video on demand on July 1. The official logline for Bring Her Back reads, “A brother and sister uncover a terrifying ritual at the secluded home of their new foster mother.” Forbes‘South Park’ Season 27 Updated Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out?By Tim Lammers Directed by twin brothers Danny Philippou and Michael Philippou, Bring Her Back stars Billy Barratt, Sora Wong, Jonah Wren Philips, Sally–Anne Upton, Stephen Philips, Mischa Heywood and Sally Hawkins. Warner Bros. Discovery announced on Wednesday that Bring Her Back will arrive on streaming on HBO Max on Friday, Oct. 3, and on HBO linear on Saturday, Oct. 4, at 8 p.m. ET. Prior to the debut of Bring Her Back on HBO on Oct. 4, the cable outlet will air the Philippou brothers’ 2022 horror hit Talk to Me. ForbesHit Horror Thriller ’28 Years Later’ Is New On Netflix This WeekBy Tim Lammers For viewers who don’t have HBO Max, the streaming platform offers three tiers: The ad-based tier costs $9.99 per month, while an ad-free tier is $16.99 per month. Additionally, an ad-free tier with 4K Ultra HD programming costs $20.99 per month. The Success Of ‘Talk To Me’ Weighed On The Minds Of Philippou Brothers While Making ‘Bring Her Back’ During the film’s theatrical run, Bring Her Back earned $19.3 million domestically and nearly $19.8 million internationally for a worldwide box office tally of $39.1 million. Bring Her Back had a production budget of $17 million before prints and advertising, according to The Numbers.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:23
XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

Ripple’s native token XRP is still battling out with the bears at the $1.90 territory on Friday afternoon. The support-turned-resistance at $1.90 is particularly
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 03:25
Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13